RSPM - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM)
RSPM’s rating suggests it is a solid but not top-tier materials ETF, with its quality driven by several strong, but not flawless, holdings. Leaders like Vulcan Materials and Packaging Corporation of America support the fund with strong financial performance and positive growth outlooks, while names like Dow and Ball Corporation weigh on the rating due to weaker profitability, bearish price trends, and ongoing cash flow and economic pressures; investors should also note the fund’s focus on the materials sector, which concentrates risk in one cyclical area of the market.
RSPM vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 176.80M
- Region
- North America
- Expense Ratio
- 0.40%
- Beta
- 0.73
- Issuer
- Invesco
- Inception Date
- Nov 01, 2006
- Dividend Yield
- 1.77%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Materials -SEC
RSPM Summary
RSPM is the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF, which follows a materials-focused version of the S&P 500 index. It invests in U.S. companies that make chemicals, packaging, construction materials, and paper products. Well-known holdings include Sherwin-Williams and International Paper. Because each company is given roughly the same weight, you’re not overly dependent on a few giants, which can help with diversification and give smaller firms a chance to contribute to returns. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to the materials sector, so its value can rise or fall sharply with economic cycles and commodity prices.
How much will it cost me?
The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an equal-weight strategy, which requires more active management compared to passively managed funds. It’s a reasonable cost for investors seeking targeted exposure to the materials sector with balanced diversification.
What would affect this ETF?
The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) could benefit from increased demand for materials driven by infrastructure spending, construction growth, or advancements in green technologies, which often rely on metals and chemicals. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for companies in the sector, or economic slowdowns that reduce demand for raw materials. Its focus on U.S.-based companies and equal weighting provides diversification but may limit exposure to faster-growing international markets.
RSPM Top 10 Holdings
RSPM is a U.S.-focused play on the materials world, with packaging, chemicals, and coatings companies setting the tone. International Flavors & Fragrances has been a bright spot lately, giving the fund a lift as its turnaround story gains traction, while names like Linde and Sherwin-Williams look a bit tired, with recent trading momentum losing steam. Vulcan Materials has been notably lagging, acting as a brake on performance. Overall, the ETF spreads its bets across industrial materials rather than crowding into a single giant, keeping sector risk focused but stock-specific risk diversified.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 IFF | International Flavors & Fragrances | 4.58% | $8.14M | $23.21B | 41.10% | 61Neutral |
 LIN | Linde | 4.55% | $8.09M | $231.36B | 11.15% | 66Neutral |
 BALL | Ball | 4.50% | $8.01M | $16.90B | 31.72% | 59Neutral |
 ECL | Ecolab | 4.48% | $7.97M | $80.78B | 2.85% | 66Neutral |
 PKG | Packaging | 4.45% | $7.91M | $21.06B | 16.05% | 76Outperform |
 AVY | Avery Dennison | 4.44% | $7.90M | $13.31B | 11.15% | 73Outperform |
 SHW | Sherwin-Williams Company | 4.43% | $7.89M | $80.50B | 1.44% | 66Neutral |
 VMC | Vulcan Materials | 4.43% | $7.89M | $33.36B | -11.35% | 77Outperform |
 DOW | Dow Inc | 4.42% | $7.86M | $22.17B | 41.89% | 49Neutral |
 AMCR | Amcor | 4.39% | $7.81M | $20.32B | 9.77% | 73Outperform |
RSPM Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPM, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of 38.89 is above the 20-day moving average (MA) of 37.82, below the 50-day MA of 39.04, and above the 200-day MA of 38.57, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.10 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 59.06 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 80.91 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RSPM.
RSPM Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSPM | $38.89 | $42.00(8.00% Upside) | $176.80M | 0.40% | 66Neutral |
 RSPH | $39.37 | $41.86(6.32% Upside) | $939.75M | 0.40% | 71Outperform |
 REZ | $90.60 | $102.52(13.15% Upside) | $781.93M | 0.48% | 70Neutral |
 FXU | $46.73 | $52.72(12.81% Upside) | $727.57M | 0.61% | 67Neutral |
 FMAT | $57.77 | $69.61(20.49% Upside) | $590.08M | 0.08% | 67Neutral |
 FXZ | $76.82 | $93.19(21.30% Upside) | $370.19M | 0.64% | 69Neutral |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSPM | Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF | 38.89 | 6.39 | 19.65% | |
| RSPH | Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF | 39.37 | 8.78 | 28.71% | |
| REZ | iShares Residential and Multisector Real Estate ETF | 90.60 | 7.90 | 9.56% | |
| FXU | First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund | 46.73 | 1.14 | 2.50% | |
| FMAT | Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF | 57.77 | 6.44 | 12.54% | |
| FXZ | First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund | 76.82 | 15.11 | 24.48% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.