KBWP - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP)
Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong short-term gains over the past month and quarter, indicating positive recent momentum.
Strong Core Insurance Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Travelers and Allstate, have delivered strong year-to-date results that support the fund’s overall performance.
Focused Industry Exposure
By concentrating on property and casualty insurance companies, the ETF gives investors targeted access to a specific area of the financial sector that can benefit from steady premium income.
Negative Factors
High Industry Concentration
Almost all of the fund’s assets are in financial-sector insurance stocks, so it is heavily exposed to downturns in that single industry.
Several Lagging Top Holdings
A number of major positions, including Progressive, Brown & Brown, and Willis Towers Watson, have shown weak year-to-date performance, which can drag on the fund’s returns.
Limited Geographic Diversification
With nearly all holdings in U.S. companies, the ETF offers little international exposure, making it more sensitive to U.S.-specific economic and regulatory risks.
KBWP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM275.55M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.35%
Beta0.39
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateDec 02, 2010
Dividend Yield1.98%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedKBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty Total Return Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume17,749
30 Day Avg. Volume19,262
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
144.51Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering24
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
KBWP Summary
KBWP is the Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF, which follows the KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty Total Return Index. It invests mainly in U.S. insurance companies that cover homes, cars, businesses, and liability risks. Well-known holdings include Travelers Companies and Chubb. Investors might consider KBWP for diversification and exposure to a steady, insurance-focused slice of the financial sector, which can offer both growth and dividend income over time. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in insurance stocks, so its value can rise or fall with changes in the financial sector and insurance industry conditions.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is a sector-specific fund that requires more active management to track the niche property and casualty insurance industry.
What would affect this ETF?The KBWP ETF, focused on U.S. property and casualty insurance companies, could benefit from stable premium income and increased demand for insurance due to rising risks like natural disasters or legal liabilities. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes, economic downturns that impact underwriting profitability, or interest rate hikes that affect investment returns for insurers. Its reliance on the financial sector and top holdings like Travelers and Chubb makes it sensitive to broader sector trends and economic conditions.
KBWP Top 10 Holdings
KBWP is essentially a pure play on U.S. property and casualty insurance, with performance driven by a tight cluster of heavyweight names. Travelers and Chubb have been steady engines over the past few months, even if they’ve lost a bit of short-term steam. Marsh & McLennan and Willis Towers Watson are rising nicely, giving the fund a lift from the brokerage and consulting side of insurance. Progressive and Brown & Brown are more mixed, occasionally dragging on returns, but the overall story is a concentrated, North America–focused bet on traditional insurers’ resilience.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Travelers Companies | 8.47% | $23.27M | $75.51B | 32.15% | 78 Outperform | |
| Chubb | 8.46% | $23.24M | $129.54B | 20.32% | 80 Outperform | |
| Progressive | 7.93% | $21.79M | $120.25B | -16.52% | 78 Outperform | |
| Marsh & McLennan Companies | 7.66% | $21.04M | $81.13B | -14.16% | 71 Outperform | |
| Aon | 7.35% | $20.18M | $60.69B | -21.48% | 66 Neutral | |
| W. R. Berkley Corporation | 4.26% | $11.71M | $25.31B | -9.75% | 73 Outperform | |
| American International Group | 4.19% | $11.52M | $39.31B | -2.96% | 60 Neutral | |
| Arch Capital Group | 4.15% | $11.39M | $32.40B | 6.08% | 79 Outperform | |
| Cincinnati Financial | 4.09% | $11.23M | $25.45B | 5.12% | 76 Outperform | |
| Everest Group | 4.03% | $11.07M | $14.22B | 7.75% | 64 Neutral |
KBWP Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
132.38
Negative
127.22
Negative
124.32
Negative
Market Momentum
-2.21
Positive
30.15
Neutral
2.67
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For KBWP, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 129.63, equal to the 50-day MA of 132.38, and equal to the 200-day MA of 124.32, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -2.21 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 30.15 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 2.67 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for KBWP.
KBWP Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF
123.84
4.00
3.34%
IAT
iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF
―
―
―
KIE
SPDR S&P Insurance ETF
―
―
―
KCE
SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF
―
―
―
REM
iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF
―
―
―
IAK
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents