tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

GVLU - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

GVLU

Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU)

Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:
GVLU’s rating suggests it is a solid but not top-tier value-focused ETF, supported by strong contributors like Kinross Gold, which benefits from robust cash flow and positive earnings, and Lululemon, which combines strong financial performance with growth in international and digital channels. However, holdings such as DuPont, Middleby, and BrightSpring face profitability, leverage, or valuation challenges that temper the fund’s overall appeal. A key risk is that several major holdings show signs of overvaluation or mixed technical signals, which could increase volatility for investors.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year and in recent months, showing solid momentum.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors, including consumer, technology, financials, industrials, health care, and energy, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single area.
Multiple Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as BrightSpring Health Services, Crocs, TFI International, TD SYNNEX, and Occidental Petroleum, have shown strong performance, supporting the fund’s overall results.
Negative Factors
Higher Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the returns go toward fees instead of staying in investors’ pockets.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With the vast majority of assets in U.S. companies and only small exposure to Canada and Switzerland, the fund offers limited geographic diversification.
Some Weak Top Holdings
A few key positions, such as PayPal and Kinross Gold, have shown weak or negative performance, which can drag on the ETF’s overall returns.

GVLU vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

GVLU Summary

The Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) is an exchange-traded fund that focuses on value stocks across the total U.S. market, meaning it looks for companies the managers believe are trading for less than they’re really worth. It doesn’t track a traditional index, but instead follows a value-investing strategy across many sectors like consumer, technology, and financials. Well-known holdings include PayPal and Occidental Petroleum. Someone might invest in GVLU to seek long-term growth from undervalued companies while staying diversified across industries. A key risk is that value stocks can stay out of favor for long periods, so the share price can go up and down with market swings.
How much will it cost me?The Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) has an expense ratio of 0.5%, meaning you’ll pay $5 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, which involves more research and decision-making compared to passively managed funds that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) could benefit from a strong U.S. economy, as its focus on undervalued stocks across sectors like Consumer Cyclical, Health Care, and Industrials may see growth if consumer spending and industrial activity rise. However, higher interest rates or economic uncertainty could negatively impact value stocks, particularly in sectors like Financials and Consumer Defensive, as borrowing costs increase and consumer demand weakens. Regulatory changes or sector-specific challenges, such as stricter environmental policies affecting Energy holdings, may also influence performance.

GVLU Top 10 Holdings

GVLU’s story is less about one star and more about a deep bench of U.S. value names. Gold miners like SSR Mining and Kinross are rising and quietly giving the fund a lift, while industrial stalwart Stanley Black & Decker has turned into a steady helper after a stronger stretch. On the flip side, consumer names such as Lululemon and Celsius are losing steam, and auto-tech player Aptiv is dragging performance with weaker recent trading. Sector exposure is spread across cyclicals, industrials, and materials rather than being dominated by Big Tech.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Kinross Gold0.54%$1.40M$37.09B49.62%
81
Outperform
DuPont de Nemours0.49%$1.27M$18.50B-40.64%
62
Neutral
SSR Mining0.48%$1.26M$7.60B93.11%
The Middleby0.47%$1.23M$5.10B-17.61%
61
Neutral
Lululemon Athletica0.47%$1.23M$14.34B-40.25%
75
Outperform
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.0.47%$1.23M$11.70B149.60%
67
Neutral
Stanley Black & Decker0.47%$1.23M$14.77B31.65%
68
Neutral
Aptiv0.47%$1.23M$9.50B-42.47%
70
Outperform
General Motors0.47%$1.21M$75.70B47.24%
73
Outperform
Crown Castle0.46%$1.20M$32.39B-23.20%
45
Neutral

GVLU Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
27.74
Positive
100DMA
26.98
Positive
200DMA
26.11
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.43
Positive
RSI
65.25
Neutral
STOCH
90.22
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GVLU, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 28.90, equal to the 50-day MA of 27.74, and equal to the 200-day MA of 26.11, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.43 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 65.25 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 90.22 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GVLU.

GVLU Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$259.61M0.50%
69
Neutral
$960.08M0.13%
69
Neutral
$676.41M0.40%
74
Outperform
$633.60M0.28%
72
Outperform
$430.20M0.38%
72
Outperform
$325.59M0.60%
71
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
GVLU
Gotham 1000 Value ETF
29.17
5.40
22.72%
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
LSVD
LSV Disciplined Value ETF
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. AI Enhanced Value Fund
BUSA
Brandes U.S. Value ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement