QVAL - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL)
QVAL’s rating suggests it is a solid but not top-tier ETF, with much of its strength coming from high-quality holdings like ConocoPhillips and Accenture, which show strong financial performance, healthy cash flow, and strategic growth in areas like AI and energy production. However, several energy-focused holdings such as Valero Energy and HF Sinclair face valuation concerns, profitability pressures, or industry volatility, which can hold back the fund’s overall appeal. A key risk is the ETF’s heavy exposure to oil and gas companies, making it more sensitive to swings in energy prices and sector-specific challenges.
QVAL vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 711.29M
- Region
- North America
- Expense Ratio
- 0.28%
- Beta
- 0.68
- Issuer
- Alpha Architect
- Inception Date
- Oct 22, 2014
- Dividend Yield
- 1.36%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- No Underlying Index
QVAL Summary
QVAL is the Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF, focused on finding U.S. companies that look cheap compared with their business strength, following a value-investing theme rather than a specific index. It uses a rules-based, data-driven process to pick stocks across many sectors, with big weights in energy and consumer companies. Well-known holdings include Accenture and Adobe, along with brands like Constellation Brands. Someone might invest in QVAL to seek long-term growth by buying undervalued stocks and to diversify across different industries. A key risk is that value stocks can stay out of favor for long periods, so the ETF’s price can go up and down significantly.
How much will it cost me?
QVAL has an annual expense ratio of 0.28%, which means you’ll pay about $2.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is higher than the average index ETF because QVAL is actively managed using a specialized quantitative value strategy, which typically charges more for its research and stock selection process.
What would affect this ETF?
QVAL could benefit if the U.S. economy stays healthy, consumer spending remains strong, and energy prices rise, since it is heavily invested in U.S. value stocks with large exposure to energy and consumer cyclical companies like Marathon Petroleum, ConocoPhillips, Abercrombie & Fitch, and Expedia. On the downside, an economic slowdown, falling energy prices, or higher interest rates that hurt cyclical and value stocks, along with any new regulations affecting health care or energy businesses, could weigh on the fund’s future performance.
QVAL Top 10 Holdings
QVAL’s story is all about old-school value with a modern twist, and energy names are clearly in the driver’s seat. ConocoPhillips, EOG Resources, APA, and Range Resources have been rising, giving the fund a strong tailwind from the oil and gas patch, while EQT has been more steady than exciting. On the consumer side, Abercrombie & Fitch and Urban Outfitters are still pulling their weight, but Constellation Brands looks a bit sluggish. Accenture adds a tech-and-services flavor, yet overall this is a U.S.-only, energy-heavy value play rather than a broad, growthy mix.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range Resources | 2.61% | $18.21M | $12.77B | 57.89% | 78Outperform | |
| Accenture | 2.55% | $17.79M | $152.63B | 3.61% | 79Outperform | |
| United Therapeutics | 2.25% | $15.64M | $25.68B | 32.01% | 79Outperform | |
| Abercrombie Fitch | 2.26% | $15.73M | $6.98B | 127.69% | 78Outperform | |
| Adt | 2.92% | $20.32M | $7.20B | 12.81% | 69Neutral | |
| APA | 2.20% | $15.32M | $18.51B | 135.80% | 73Outperform | |
| Conocophillips | 2.15% | $14.98M | $185.04B | 74.76% | 78Outperform | |
| Urban Outfitters | 2.20% | $15.33M | $7.77B | 37.81% | 78Outperform | |
| Constellation Brands | 2.10% | $14.66M | $22.90B | 5.00% | 67Neutral | |
| EOG Resources | 2.09% | $14.59M | $86.83B | 56.97% | 78Outperform |
QVAL Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For QVAL, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of 64.54 is above the 20-day moving average (MA) of 61.97, above the 50-day MA of 61.04, and above the 200-day MA of 55.97, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.05 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 72.39 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 81.45 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for QVAL.
QVAL Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $64.54 | $69.00(6.91% Upside) | $711.29M | 0.28% | 73Outperform | |
| $161.30 | $189.21(17.30% Upside) | $966.75M | 0.13% | 69Neutral | |
| $35.38 | $43.57(23.16% Upside) | $667.14M | 0.40% | 74Outperform | |
| $134.49 | $153.96(14.48% Upside) | $424.74M | 0.38% | 72Outperform | |
| $42.28 | $47.98(13.48% Upside) | $411.68M | 0.60% | 70Outperform | |
| $29.12 | $34.02(16.83% Upside) | $260.62M | 0.50% | 69Neutral |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QVAL | Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 64.54 | 19.33 | 42.75% | |
| VFVA | Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 161.30 | 38.18 | 31.01% | |
| LSVD | LSV Disciplined Value ETF | 35.38 | 6.50 | 22.50% | |
| AIVL | WisdomTree U.S. AI Enhanced Value Fund | 134.49 | 24.29 | 22.04% | |
| BUSA | Brandes U.S. Value ETF | 42.28 | 8.33 | 24.52% | |
| GVLU | Gotham 1000 Value ETF | 29.12 | 5.67 | 24.16% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.