tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

RWK - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RWK

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK)

Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:
$133.00
The Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) has a solid overall rating, reflecting a mix of strengths and challenges among its holdings. TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) and Flex (FLEX) stand out as key contributors, driven by strong earnings performance, robust technical indicators, and strategic growth initiatives. However, weaker holdings like PBF Energy (PBF), which faces financial challenges and profitability concerns, may have slightly held back the fund's rating. Investors should note the ETF's exposure to companies with high leverage and operational risks, which could impact its stability.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several top holdings, such as TD SYNNEX and Flex, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF's overall returns.
Sector Diversification
The ETF is spread across multiple sectors, including Consumer Cyclical, Industrials, and Technology, reducing reliance on any single industry.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The ETF's expense ratio of 0.39% is reasonable compared to many actively managed funds, helping investors retain more of their returns.
Negative Factors
Over-Concentration in the U.S.
With nearly all assets allocated to U.S. companies, the ETF lacks meaningful global diversification.
Mixed Performance Among Holdings
Some top holdings, such as American Airlines and Albertsons Companies, have underperformed year-to-date, dragging on overall performance.
Heavy Sector Weighting
The ETF is heavily weighted toward Consumer Cyclical and Industrials, which could make it vulnerable to economic downturns affecting these sectors.

RWK vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RWK Summary

The Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) is an investment fund that focuses on medium-sized U.S. companies by tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. Instead of using market size, it selects companies based on their revenue, which can highlight firms with strong earning power. This ETF includes well-known names like Albertsons Companies and American Airlines, offering exposure to industries like consumer goods, technology, and financials. Investors might consider RWK for portfolio diversification and the growth potential of mid-sized companies. However, new investors should note that mid-cap stocks can be more volatile than larger companies, meaning the ETF’s value may rise and fall with market conditions.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) has an expense ratio of 0.39%, meaning you’ll pay $3.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on revenue-weighted mid-cap companies rather than traditional market-cap weighting.
What would affect this ETF?RWK's focus on mid-sized U.S. companies could benefit from economic growth, as these firms often thrive during periods of expansion and consumer spending increases, especially in sectors like Consumer Cyclical and Industrials. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns may negatively impact mid-cap companies, which often rely on borrowing for growth and are more sensitive to economic conditions. Additionally, sector-specific challenges, such as regulatory changes in Technology or Energy, could affect the ETF's performance.

RWK Top 10 Holdings

The RWK ETF leans heavily into the U.S. mid-cap space, with a notable focus on consumer cyclical and industrial sectors driving its positioning. Flex is a standout performer, rising on strong financial results and strategic moves in the data center space, while TD SYNNEX also adds momentum with robust earnings and upward stock trends. On the flip side, American Airlines is lagging due to operational disruptions and domestic revenue challenges, and Lithia Motors is losing steam amid bearish technical signals. Overall, the fund balances growth potential with sector diversity, though consumer-focused names play a key role.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Albertsons Companies3.38%$34.15M$9.74B-7.94%
67
Neutral
TD SYNNEX Corporation2.61%$26.36M$12.34B20.48%
76
Outperform
Performance Food Group2.61%$26.36M$15.48B14.84%
63
Neutral
American Airlines2.51%$25.41M$9.01B-1.16%
63
Neutral
PBF Energy1.73%$17.46M$4.28B19.37%
55
Neutral
US Foods Holding1.59%$16.06M$16.38B9.85%
65
Neutral
Lithia Motors1.41%$14.24M$7.11B-21.03%
69
Neutral
HF Sinclair Corporation1.25%$12.65M$10.07B30.90%
68
Neutral
Flex1.23%$12.39M$23.16B56.25%
74
Outperform
Macy's1.18%$11.94M$5.46B29.86%
58
Neutral

RWK Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
125.08
Negative
100DMA
122.56
Positive
200DMA
116.63
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.45
Positive
RSI
47.61
Neutral
STOCH
22.86
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RWK, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 124.14, equal to the 50-day MA of 125.08, and equal to the 200-day MA of 116.63, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.45 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 47.61 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 22.86 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for RWK.

RWK Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$997.90M0.39%
67
Neutral
$779.19M0.38%
69
Neutral
$753.43M0.25%
70
Neutral
$590.42M0.04%
68
Neutral
$488.92M0.35%
73
Outperform
$394.02M0.60%
70
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RWK
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
123.50
1.95
1.60%
EZM
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Fund
XMLV
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
BKMC
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
GRPM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
PTMC
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement