tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

ONEV - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

ONEV

SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV)

Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:
ONEV, the SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF, has an overall rating that suggests it is a generally solid but not outstanding option, supported by several strong, stable companies. Key holdings like Arch Capital Group and NetApp help the fund by delivering strong financial performance and growth in areas like insurance and cloud/AI solutions, while T Rowe Price adds support with solid results and an attractive valuation. However, holdings such as McKesson and Cardinal Health, which face leverage, profitability, and valuation concerns, along with some signs of bearish or overbought technical trends in other names, introduce risk, and the fund’s focus on a relatively narrow group of large U.S. companies can increase exposure to sector and style shifts.
Positive Factors
Low Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively low annual fee helps investors keep more of their returns over time.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors, including industrials, health care, consumer, financials, and technology, which helps reduce the impact if any one sector struggles.
Low-Volatility Focus With Positive Recent Performance
The ETF is designed to target lower-volatility stocks and has still delivered generally positive returns so far this year.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
Almost all assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering very limited international diversification.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, including some health care and technology names, have shown weak or negative performance this year, which can drag on overall returns.
Limited Exposure to High-Growth Sectors
The fund’s low-volatility approach and relatively modest weighting in technology and communication services may cause it to lag more aggressive, growth-focused funds in strong bull markets.

ONEV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

ONEV Summary

The SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) is a fund that follows the Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor Index, aiming to hold large, established U.S. companies that tend to have steadier stock prices. It owns a wide mix of sectors, including health care, industrials, and technology, with well-known names like Cardinal Health and McKesson. Someone might invest in ONEV to get broad stock market exposure while trying to reduce big price swings and smooth out the ride over time. A key risk is that it can still lose value and go up and down with the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?The SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (Ticker: ONEV) has an expense ratio of 0.2%, which means you’ll pay $2 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is lower than average for actively managed funds but slightly higher than many passively managed ETFs, as it focuses on a specific strategy of minimizing volatility.
What would affect this ETF?The SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) could benefit from stable economic conditions and increased investor interest in large-cap, low-volatility stocks, particularly in sectors like healthcare and technology that are known for resilience. However, rising interest rates or economic uncertainty could negatively impact sectors like financials and consumer cyclical, which are sensitive to broader market conditions. Regulatory changes or disruptions in the U.S. market, where the ETF is heavily focused, could also pose risks.

ONEV Top 10 Holdings

ONEV’s story is all about steady, low-drama leaders rather than headline-grabbing giants. Health care names like Cardinal Health and Humana are rising and doing much of the heavy lifting, while distributors such as McKesson and Cencora have been losing steam and quietly tugging on returns. On the tech side, Flex, HPE, and NetApp are climbing, giving the fund a helpful tailwind without turning it into a pure Big Tech bet. With a broadly diversified, U.S.-only mix, no single stock dominates, keeping the ride relatively smooth.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Allstate1.50%$5.25M$64.44B30.02%
74
Outperform
Progressive1.28%$4.47M$135.69B-6.85%
78
Outperform
McKesson0.96%$3.36M$92.06B11.49%
62
Neutral
Arch Capital Group0.95%$3.32M$35.71B14.01%
79
Outperform
Cigna0.90%$3.14M$76.12B-8.13%
72
Outperform
Cincinnati Financial0.83%$2.90M$29.70B29.41%
76
Outperform
Travelers Companies0.81%$2.83M$72.79B32.29%
78
Outperform
Hartford Insurance0.76%$2.67M$37.79B14.03%
78
Outperform
Kroger Company0.76%$2.64M$35.67B-16.06%
56
Neutral
T Rowe Price0.72%$2.50M$25.40B20.47%
75
Outperform

ONEV Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
140.51
Positive
100DMA
138.68
Positive
200DMA
135.67
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.30
Negative
RSI
57.93
Neutral
STOCH
47.12
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For ONEV, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 143.13, equal to the 50-day MA of 140.51, and equal to the 200-day MA of 135.67, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.30 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 57.93 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 47.12 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for ONEV.

ONEV Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$347.86M0.20%
70
Outperform
$987.60M0.25%
71
Outperform
$983.04M0.25%
74
Outperform
$978.09M0.18%
72
Outperform
$926.99M0.75%
71
Outperform
$923.20M0.95%
69
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
144.30
15.55
12.08%
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF
QLC
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund
DSPY
Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy
FTQI
First Trust Hedged BuyWrite Income ETF
OMAH
VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement