DSPY - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY)
DSPY’s rating reflects a solid overall quality, driven mainly by large positions in leaders like Apple and Microsoft, which benefit from strong financial performance, growth in services, cloud, and AI, and generally supportive technical trends. Other major holdings such as Nvidia, Broadcom, Meta, and Micron add to the strength through their focus on AI and data centers, though several names carry high valuations and mixed technical signals that can limit upside. The main risk factor is the fund’s concentration in big U.S. technology and growth-oriented companies, where premium valuations and occasional bearish or cautious technical indicators could increase volatility.
DSPY vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 1.01B
- Region
- North America
- Expense Ratio
- 0.18%
- Beta
- 0.86
- Issuer
- Tema
- Inception Date
- Apr 01, 2025
- Dividend Yield
- 0.96%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- No Underlying Index
DSPY Summary
DSPY is an ETF that invests in large U.S. companies from the S&P 500, but instead of using today’s market weights, it uses a strategy based on how the index has been weighted on average since 1989. This gives you broad exposure to many sectors, with a tilt toward big names like Apple and Nvidia, while still holding companies in areas like health care, finance, and consumer goods. Someone might invest in DSPY for long-term growth and diversification across many leading U.S. businesses. A key risk is that its value can rise and fall with the overall stock market, especially large U.S. companies.
How much will it cost me?
DSPY has an expense ratio of 0.18%, which means you’ll pay about $1.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than many basic index ETFs because DSPY is actively managed with a more specialized strategy instead of simply tracking a standard index.
What would affect this ETF?
DSPY could benefit if major U.S. technology and healthcare companies like Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, and Eli Lilly continue to grow and if the overall U.S. economy remains strong, supporting large-cap stocks. On the negative side, rising interest rates, tighter regulations on big tech or financial firms, or a broad market downturn in the U.S. could hurt these sectors and weigh on the ETF’s performance, especially given its heavy focus on large, well-known companies.
DSPY Top 10 Holdings
DSPY’s story is all about U.S. mega-cap muscle, with Big Tech and AI at center stage. Apple and Microsoft have been steady climbers, helping to prop up returns, while Eli Lilly has been a standout winner, giving the fund a powerful boost from health care. On the flip side, Nvidia and Micron, despite their AI buzz, have seen more mixed, recently lagging moves that can tug on performance. Amazon and Broadcom are also losing a bit of steam, underscoring that this tech-heavy, U.S.-focused lineup can cut both ways in the short term.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia | 3.73% | $38.30M | $4.82T | -6.97% | 76Outperform | |
| Apple | 3.43% | $35.29M | $5.08T | 27.40% | 79Outperform | |
| Microsoft | 2.72% | $27.94M | $4.13T | 5.67% | 79Outperform | |
| Amazon | 2.10% | $21.59M | $2.88T | 4.00% | 71Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 1.64% | $16.81M | $1.55T | -18.79% | 76Outperform | |
| Tesla | 1.52% | $15.60M | $1.52T | -25.62% | 73Outperform | |
| Meta Platforms | 1.62% | $16.68M | $1.61T | -4.85% | 76Outperform | |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 1.55% | $15.97M | $1.33T | 47.41% | 72Outperform | |
| Berkshire Hathaway B | 1.57% | $16.10M | $1.24T | 17.10% | 66Neutral | |
| Micron | 1.26% | $12.98M | $899.74B | 176.37% | 79Outperform |
DSPY Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For DSPY, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of 64.08 is below the 20-day moving average (MA) of 66.43, below the 50-day MA of 66.40, and above the 200-day MA of 63.25, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.20 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 34.49 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 29.95 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for DSPY.
DSPY Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $64.08 | $73.00(13.91% Upside) | $1.01B | 0.18% | 72Outperform | |
| $41.44 | $53.25(28.51% Upside) | $8.85B | 0.18% | 73Outperform | |
| $46.74 | $55.32(18.37% Upside) | $7.98B | 0.56% | 63Neutral | |
| $41.93 | $54.28(29.44% Upside) | $8.01B | 0.31% | 69Neutral | |
| $53.20 | $67.50(26.87% Upside) | $6.57B | 0.29% | 71Outperform | |
| $50.58 | $71.57(41.50% Upside) | $6.46B | 0.29% | 73Outperform |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSPY | Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy | 64.08 | 7.42 | 13.10% | |
| FELC | Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF | 41.44 | 4.42 | 11.94% | |
| DIVO | Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 46.74 | 4.73 | 11.26% | |
| TCAF | T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF | 41.93 | 4.01 | 10.58% | |
| GPIX | Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF | 53.20 | 5.47 | 11.45% | |
| GPIQ | Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF | 50.58 | 3.40 | 7.20% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.