TipRanks
Advertisement

MODL - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

MODL

VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF (MODL)

Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:―
MODL’s rating reflects a solid overall fund built around leading U.S. companies, especially in technology and communication services. Strong holdings like Apple, Microsoft, and Alphabet (both GOOGL and GOOG) boost the fund thanks to their robust financial performance, growth in AI and cloud, and positive earnings outlooks, while some positions such as AbbVie and Eli Lilly introduce risks related to high valuation, leverage, and financial stability. The main risk factor is the fund’s meaningful exposure to high-growth, tech-focused names, where premium valuations and occasional bearish or mixed technical signals could increase volatility.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year and over the past three months, showing positive momentum.
Leading Technology and Healthcare Names
Top holdings like Nvidia, Apple, Alphabet, AbbVie, Broadcom, and Eli Lilly have shown strong or steady performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Broad Sector Diversification
Exposure across technology, financials, health care, communication services, and several other sectors helps reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With almost all assets in U.S. companies, the fund offers little geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market.
Notable Stock Concentration
A small group of large positions, especially in big technology names, makes up a meaningful share of the portfolio, increasing reliance on those companies.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
While several major positions have done well, some key holdings like Microsoft and Meta have shown weaker recent performance, which can weigh on overall results.

MODL vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

MODL Summary

The VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF (ticker: MODL) is a fund that invests in many large U.S. companies across different industries, without tracking a single index. It leans heavily toward technology, financial, and health care stocks, and holds well-known names like Apple and Nvidia. Someone might consider this ETF to get broad exposure to many leading U.S. companies in one investment, which can help with diversification and long-term growth potential. A key risk is that it is heavily tilted toward tech and other large U.S. stocks, so its price can rise and fall sharply with those parts of the market.
How much will it cost me?The VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) has an expense ratio of 0.46%, which means you’ll pay $4.60 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average because it is actively managed, aiming to provide strategic exposure to large-cap stocks across various sectors. Active management often involves more research and adjustments compared to passively managed funds, which track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) could benefit from continued growth in the technology sector, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings, as well as strong performance from top companies like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact consumer spending and growth-oriented sectors like technology and communication services, which are heavily weighted in this ETF. Regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions affecting large-cap U.S. companies could also pose risks to future performance.

MODL Top 10 Holdings

MODL leans heavily on U.S. Big Tech, with Nvidia and Apple doing much of the heavy lifting as their shares keep rising on the back of AI and steady consumer demand. Microsoft has been more mixed lately, softening the tech tailwind, while Alphabet’s twin share classes have been lagging and occasionally tugging performance lower. Meta has surged, adding extra fuel to the growth story, and health care names like AbbVie provide a steadier counterweight. Overall, this is a U.S.-centric, tech-tilted fund where a handful of giants set the tone.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Nvidia6.44%$68.17M$5.64T24.69%
76
Outperform
Apple5.90%$62.50M$4.87T29.33%
79
Outperform
Microsoft4.56%$48.27M$3.84T0.03%
79
Outperform
Alphabet Class A4.46%$47.25M$4.18T40.00%
85
Outperform
Alphabet Class C3.88%$41.08M$4.18T38.10%
82
Outperform
Meta Platforms3.54%$37.48M$1.85T2.46%
76
Outperform
AbbVie2.40%$25.47M$464.43B12.36%
66
Neutral
Amazon2.18%$23.07M$2.71T14.58%
71
Outperform
Broadcom1.99%$21.10M$1.70T4.96%
76
Outperform
Eli Lilly & Co1.93%$20.46M$1.08T36.07%
72
Outperform

MODL Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price―
Price Trends
50DMA
52.39
Positive
100DMA
51.49
Positive
200DMA
49.26
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.03
Positive
RSI
51.63
Neutral
STOCH
28.50
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MODL, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 52.47, equal to the 50-day MA of 52.39, and equal to the 200-day MA of 49.26, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.03 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 51.63 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 28.50 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for MODL.

MODL Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
――$1.06B0.46%
73
Outperform
――$8.65B0.18%
74
Outperform
――$8.15B0.31%
69
Neutral
――$7.74B0.56%
63
Neutral
――$6.24B0.29%
73
Outperform
――$6.01B0.29%
71
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
MODL
VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF
52.61
6.36
13.75%
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
―
―
―
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
―
―
―
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
―
―
―
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF
―
―
―
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement