Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
MODL - AI Analysis
Top Page
VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF (MODL)
Rating:75Outperform
Price Target:
$53.00
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key positions, such as Nvidia, Alphabet, and Broadcom, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, driving the fund's returns.
Sector Diversification
The ETF is spread across multiple sectors, including Technology, Communication Services, and Health Care, reducing reliance on any single industry.
Solid Year-to-Date Performance
The fund has shown strong overall performance this year, indicating positive momentum.
Negative Factors
High Technology Exposure
With over 30% of the portfolio in Technology, the fund is heavily reliant on the performance of this sector, which can be volatile.
Limited Geographic Exposure
The ETF is almost entirely focused on U.S. companies, offering little diversification across global markets.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund's expense ratio is higher than some low-cost ETFs, which could slightly reduce overall returns over time.
MODL vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM666.87M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.46%
Beta0.94
IssuerVictoryShares
Inception DateOct 12, 2022
Dividend Yield0.66%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume66,504
30 Day Avg. Volume36,688
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
52.87Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering353
MODL Summary
The VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) is an investment fund that focuses on large-cap U.S. companies across various industries, including technology, healthcare, and financials. It includes well-known companies like Nvidia and Microsoft, making it a great option for investors who want exposure to established, high-quality businesses. This ETF offers a balanced approach to growth and stability, making it appealing for those looking to diversify their portfolio with reliable U.S. stocks. However, new investors should be aware that the ETF’s performance can fluctuate with the overall market, especially since it has significant exposure to the technology sector.
How much will it cost me?The VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) has an expense ratio of 0.46%, which means you’ll pay $4.60 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average because it is actively managed, aiming to provide strategic exposure to large-cap stocks across various sectors. Active management often involves more research and adjustments compared to passively managed funds, which track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) could benefit from continued growth in the technology sector, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings, as well as strong performance from top companies like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact consumer spending and growth-oriented sectors like technology and communication services, which are heavily weighted in this ETF. Regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions affecting large-cap U.S. companies could also pose risks to future performance.
MODL Top 10 Holdings
The VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) leans heavily into technology, with names like Nvidia and Microsoft driving its performance thanks to their strong positioning in AI and cloud services. Alphabet’s steady growth in AI and advertising adds further momentum, while Meta’s recent struggles with regulatory challenges and Amazon’s mixed results are holding the fund back. With a clear focus on U.S. large-cap stocks, MODL is riding the wave of tech innovation, but its concentration in a few big names leaves it vulnerable to sector-specific volatility.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia | 6.43% | $43.57M | $4.89T | 42.32% | 85 Outperform | |
| Microsoft | 5.32% | $36.07M | $4.03T | 25.49% | 83 Outperform | |
| Apple | 5.07% | $34.38M | $3.99T | 15.12% | 78 Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class A | 4.22% | $28.62M | $3.24T | 57.63% | 82 Outperform | |
| Meta Platforms | 4.18% | $28.36M | $1.89T | 26.66% | 82 Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class C | 3.70% | $25.08M | $3.24T | 60.35% | 83 Outperform | |
| Amazon | 3.62% | $24.55M | $2.44T | 20.13% | 77 Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 2.58% | $17.48M | $1.76T | 108.08% | 79 Outperform | |
| Tesla | 2.12% | $14.38M | $1.53T | 77.46% | 73 Outperform | |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 1.66% | $11.26M | $776.19B | -9.24% | 70 Outperform |
MODL Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
45.76
Positive
44.42
Positive
42.08
Positive
Market Momentum
0.42
Negative
69.44
Neutral
94.54
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MODL, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 46.53, equal to the 50-day MA of 45.76, and equal to the 200-day MA of 42.08, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.42 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 69.44 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 94.54 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for MODL.
MODL Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
MODL
VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF
47.70
8.26
20.94%
SEIM
SEI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF
―
―
―
AVLC
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
―
―
―
DSPY
Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy
―
―
―
FTQI
First Trust Hedged BuyWrite Income ETF
―
―
―
GSPY
Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents