QLC - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC)
QLC’s rating suggests it is a solid, higher-quality large-cap U.S. stock fund, supported by major positions in financially strong, growth-focused companies like Alphabet, Microsoft, Apple, and Nvidia, all benefiting from leadership in AI, cloud, and technology services. The fund’s reliance on several richly valued tech and AI names, some with mixed technical signals or short-term weakness like Amazon, means performance is sensitive to shifts in the technology sector, which is the main risk factor for investors to keep in mind.
QLC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 1.15B
- Region
- North America
- Expense Ratio
- 0.25%
- Beta
- 1.00
- Issuer
- Northern Trust
- Inception Date
- Sep 24, 2015
- Dividend Yield
- 0.97%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Total Return
QLC Summary
QLC is an exchange-traded fund that follows the Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index, focusing on big, established U.S. companies with strong finances and steady earnings. It holds well-known names like Apple and Nvidia, along with many others across technology, health care, financials, and more, giving investors broad diversification in one investment. Someone might consider QLC if they want long-term growth from high-quality large companies without picking individual stocks. A key risk is that it is heavily tilted toward large U.S. tech stocks, so its value can rise or fall sharply with the overall stock market and tech sector.
How much will it cost me?
QLC has an annual expense ratio of 0.25%, which means you’ll pay about $2.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than the cheapest broad U.S. index ETFs because QLC is a rules-based, quality-focused fund rather than a plain market-cap index, but it’s still reasonably low for a specialized strategy.
What would affect this ETF?
QLC is heavily invested in large U.S. technology and communication companies like Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, and Alphabet, so continued innovation, strong corporate profits, and a stable U.S. economy could boost its performance. On the other hand, rising interest rates, tighter regulations on big tech or banks, or an economic slowdown that hurts large U.S. companies across sectors such as consumer and financials could weigh on future returns.
QLC Top 10 Holdings
QLC is riding on the shoulders of Big Tech, with Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, and the two Alphabet share classes forming a powerful but tech-heavy core. Apple and Microsoft have been steadily lifting the fund, while Amazon adds a quieter but positive push. On the flip side, Alphabet’s recent slump and a softer patch for Nvidia have taken some wind out of the ETF’s sails, showing that concentration in U.S. mega-cap tech cuts both ways. A dash of financials and health care, led by JPMorgan and Johnson & Johnson, helps balance the story but doesn’t steal the spotlight.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 NVDA | Nvidia | 7.58% | $86.53M | $4.93T | 0.86% | 76Outperform |
 AAPL | Apple | 6.25% | $71.36M | $5.03T | 26.98% | 79Outperform |
 MSFT | Microsoft | 4.22% | $48.19M | $3.88T | -0.73% | 79Outperform |
 GOOGL | Alphabet Class A | 3.26% | $37.27M | $3.41T | -0.58% | 85Outperform |
 GOOG | Alphabet Class C | 2.90% | $33.08M | $3.41T | -1.31% | 82Outperform |
 AVGO | Broadcom | 2.61% | $29.79M | $1.56T | -13.38% | 76Outperform |
 AMZN | Amazon | 2.38% | $27.21M | $2.59T | 7.85% | 71Outperform |
 MU | Micron | 1.98% | $22.65M | $1.00T | 294.96% | 79Outperform |
 JPM | JPMorgan Chase | 1.93% | $22.04M | $895.92B | 8.92% | 72Outperform |
 JNJ | Johnson & Johnson | 1.92% | $21.96M | $657.68B | 44.51% | 78Outperform |
QLC Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For QLC, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of 89.39 is below the 20-day moving average (MA) of 91.40, below the 50-day MA of 91.71, and above the 200-day MA of 87.03, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.38 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 36.48 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 48.11 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for QLC.
QLC Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLC | $89.39 | $102.00(14.11% Upside) | $1.15B | 0.25% | 74Outperform |
 JQUA | $75.52 | $89.36(18.32% Upside) | $9.70B | 0.12% | 73Outperform |
 VONE | $341.66 | $429.22(25.63% Upside) | $9.54B | 0.06% | 73Outperform |
 FELC | $42.70 | $52.74(23.52% Upside) | $8.88B | 0.18% | 74Outperform |
 QYLD | $17.89 | $23.77(32.87% Upside) | $8.41B | 0.60% | 74Outperform |
 TCAF | $42.82 | $53.80(25.64% Upside) | $8.15B | 0.31% | 69Neutral |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLC | FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund | 89.39 | 10.22 | 12.90% | |
| JQUA | JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 75.52 | 13.70 | 22.17% | |
| VONE | Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 341.66 | 35.48 | 11.59% | |
| FELC | Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF | 42.70 | 4.97 | 13.16% | |
| QYLD | Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 17.89 | 2.40 | 15.52% | |
| TCAF | T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF | 42.82 | 4.28 | 11.12% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.