Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF
NANC - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC)
NANC’s rating reflects a portfolio anchored by high-quality, financially strong leaders like Microsoft, Alphabet, Apple, and Nvidia, whose growth in cloud, AI, and consumer technology supports a solid long-term outlook for the fund. The rating is tempered by weaker names such as Philip Morris and Eli Lilly, where high leverage, cash flow challenges, and bearish or cautious technical signals introduce more risk. The main risk factor is the fund’s heavy tilt toward large technology and growth-oriented companies, which can increase volatility if that sector faces a downturn.
NANC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 280.54M
- Region
- Global
- Expense Ratio
- 0.72%
- Beta
- 1.10
- Issuer
- Subversive
- Inception Date
- Feb 07, 2023
- Dividend Yield
- 0.19%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- No Underlying Index
NANC Summary
NANC is an ETF that invests mainly in U.S. companies and follows a unique theme: it builds its portfolio based on the stock trades made by Democratic members of Congress, using their public trade disclosures. It holds many large, well-known companies such as Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon, and Apple, with a strong tilt toward technology and other major sectors like health care and consumer companies. Someone might invest in NANC for broad U.S. stock market exposure with an unconventional, politically themed strategy. A key risk is that it can rise or fall with the stock market and is heavily influenced by tech stocks.
How much will it cost me?
This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.72%, which means you’ll pay about $7.20 per year for every $1,000 you invest. That’s higher than the average ETF because it’s actively managed and follows a unique strategy based on trades by Democratic members of Congress.
What would affect this ETF?
Future performance of NANC will be helped if large technology and communication companies like Nvidia, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, and Apple keep growing, and if global economic conditions and innovation in areas like cloud computing and artificial intelligence remain strong. On the negative side, higher interest rates, stricter regulations on big tech or trading by members of Congress, or a global slowdown that hurts these major holdings and sectors could weigh on the ETF.
NANC Top 10 Holdings
NANC is leaning heavily into Big Tech and AI, with Nvidia, Microsoft, and CrowdStrike acting as the main engines of performance thanks to their strong, recently rising trends and exposure to cloud and cybersecurity. Apple and Amazon are also pulling their weight, staying generally steady to positive and reinforcing the tech-heavy tilt. On the flip side, Alphabet and Applied Materials have been lagging lately, occasionally throwing sand in the gears despite solid long-term stories. The fund is largely U.S.-focused and tech-centric, so its fortunes are closely tied to the mood in America’s innovation economy.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 MSFT | Microsoft | 7.16% | $20.10M | $3.88T | 4.09% | 79Outperform |
 NVDA | Nvidia | 6.99% | $19.60M | $4.01T | -12.85% | 76Outperform |
 AMZN | Amazon | 5.32% | $14.92M | $2.89T | 12.24% | 71Outperform |
 GOOG | Alphabet Class C | 5.26% | $14.74M | $3.63T | 4.80% | 82Outperform |
 AAPL | Apple | 5.02% | $14.08M | $5.16T | 30.53% | 79Outperform |
 CRWD | CrowdStrike Holdings | 4.18% | $11.74M | $235.37B | 71.10% | 67Neutral |
 AMAT | Applied Materials | 3.57% | $10.02M | $302.32B | 65.97% | 77Outperform |
 LLY | Eli Lilly & Co | 3.25% | $9.10M | $1.34T | 41.12% | 72Outperform |
 PM | Philip Morris | 3.24% | $9.10M | $306.53B | 28.24% | 61Neutral |
 COST | Costco | 2.70% | $7.58M | $483.99B | 19.58% | 72Outperform |
NANC Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For NANC, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of 49.06 is below the 20-day moving average (MA) of 50.25, below the 50-day MA of 51.42, and above the 200-day MA of 48.62, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.75 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 40.54 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 42.93 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for NANC.
NANC Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NANC | $49.06 | $56.00(14.15% Upside) | $280.54M | 0.72% | 73Outperform |
 RGEF | $34.09 | $43.01(26.17% Upside) | $791.75M | 0.55% | 71Outperform |
 KAT | $60.70 | $67.90(11.86% Upside) | $674.59M | 0.75% | 67Neutral |
 DWLD | $46.14 | $58.48(26.73% Upside) | $586.69M | 0.62% | 61Neutral |
 RGLO | $32.78 | $40.57(23.77% Upside) | $374.44M | 0.49% | 68Neutral |
 JSTC | $22.61 | $27.45(21.40% Upside) | $301.01M | 0.89% | 60Neutral |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NANC | Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF | 49.06 | 4.33 | 9.68% | |
| RGEF | Rockefeller Global Equity ETF | 34.09 | 4.56 | 15.45% | |
| KAT | Scharf ETF | 60.70 | 7.72 | 14.57% | |
| DWLD | Davis Select Worldwide Etf | 46.14 | 2.71 | 6.23% | |
| RGLO | Global Equity Active ETF | 32.77 | 4.41 | 15.56% | |
| JSTC | Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF | 22.61 | 3.12 | 16.03% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.