KAT - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Scharf ETF (KAT)
KAT’s rating suggests it is a solid but not top-tier ETF, supported by strong core holdings like Microsoft and Markel, which bring robust financial performance, positive outlooks, and strategic growth in areas such as cloud, AI, and insurance. However, some holdings like McKesson and Occidental Petroleum face issues such as leverage, bearish technical signals, and premium valuations, which weigh on the fund’s overall appeal and highlight risks tied to companies with higher debt and more volatile price trends.
KAT vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 666.81M
- Region
- Global
- Expense Ratio
- 0.75%
- Beta
- 0.55
- Issuer
- Scharf
- Inception Date
- Aug 25, 2025
- Dividend Yield
- 0.51%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- No Underlying Index
KAT Summary
KAT, the Scharf ETF, is an actively managed fund that invests in a wide mix of companies, mainly in the U.S., across sectors like financials, health care, and technology. It doesn’t track a specific index, but instead follows a total market, broad-based theme, choosing stocks the managers believe have strong long-term potential. Well-known holdings include Microsoft and Amazon, along with major financial and energy companies. Someone might invest in KAT for diversified stock exposure with professional stock-picking. A key risk is that, like any stock-focused fund, its value can go up and down with the overall market.
How much will it cost me?
This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.75%, which means you’ll pay about $7.50 per year for every $1,000 you invest. That’s higher than the average index ETF because KAT is actively managed, with a team selecting and adjusting investments rather than simply tracking a market index.
What would affect this ETF?
Future performance of KAT could benefit from global economic growth, strong results from major technology and e-commerce names like Microsoft and Amazon, and stable financial and health care sectors, while its active management may help it adapt to changing conditions. On the downside, rising interest rates, market downturns that hurt financials and cyclical industries, energy price volatility affecting Occidental Petroleum, and any new regulations or global political tensions could weigh on returns.
KAT Top 10 Holdings
KAT leans heavily on a global mix of Big Tech and steady cash generators, with U.S. names in the driver’s seat. Meta and Agilent have been rising, giving the fund a helpful tailwind, while Microsoft and Amazon are more mixed—strong longer-term stories but recently losing a bit of steam. Energy exposure via Occidental and transportation through Union Pacific add cyclical punch, though their choppy near-term moves can tug performance in both directions. Overall, the ETF is concentrated in large, globally exposed leaders rather than niche plays.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 MSFT | Microsoft | 6.12% | $40.81M | $3.95T | -2.04% | 79Outperform |
 OXY | Occidental Petroleum | 6.08% | $40.57M | $62.71B | 53.96% | 67Neutral |
 AMZN | Amazon | 5.73% | $38.24M | $2.73T | 11.06% | 71Outperform |
 UNP | Union Pacific | 5.60% | $37.35M | $178.20B | 36.86% | 72Outperform |
 META | Meta Platforms | 5.12% | $34.12M | $1.59T | -18.49% | 76Outperform |
 MCK | McKesson | 4.95% | $33.03M | $112.75B | 19.39% | 62Neutral |
 V | Visa | 4.72% | $31.50M | $750.29B | 15.48% | 70Outperform |
 MKL | Markel | 4.69% | $31.28M | $23.03B | 0.37% | 82Outperform |
 MRSH | Marsh & McLennan Companies | 4.46% | $29.72M | $90.67B | 5.19% | 71Outperform |
 BN | Brookfield Corporation | ― | ― | ― | ― | 65Neutral |
KAT Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For KAT, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of 59.04 is above the 20-day moving average (MA) of 58.24, above the 50-day MA of 58.10, and above the 200-day MA of 56.16, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.48 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 57.49 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 60.54 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for KAT.
KAT Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAT | $59.04 | $62.00(5.01% Upside) | $666.81M | 0.75% | 64Neutral |
 RGEF | $34.68 | $44.02(26.92% Upside) | $791.42M | 0.55% | 71Outperform |
 DWLD | $44.36 | $59.33(33.76% Upside) | $579.40M | 0.62% | 62Neutral |
 RGLO | $33.20 | $40.99(23.47% Upside) | $369.32M | 0.49% | 68Neutral |
 JSTC | $22.71 | $26.85(18.26% Upside) | $298.55M | 0.89% | 60Neutral |
 NANC | $51.84 | $64.20(23.85% Upside) | $288.96M | 0.72% | 74Outperform |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAT | Scharf ETF | 59.04 | 5.34 | 9.93% | |
| RGEF | Rockefeller Global Equity ETF | 34.68 | 4.80 | 16.05% | |
| DWLD | Davis Select Worldwide Etf | 44.36 | 0.06 | 0.13% | |
| RGLO | Global Equity Active ETF | 33.20 | 4.32 | 14.95% | |
| JSTC | Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF | 22.70 | 2.70 | 13.48% | |
| NANC | Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF | 51.84 | 5.88 | 12.78% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.