ECML - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML)
ECML, the Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF, has a solid overall rating driven by strong contributors like FOXA, APA, CF, and NUTX, which combine solid financial performance, attractive valuations, and in some cases healthy dividends or growth initiatives. These strengths are partly offset by holdings such as CROX and HRB, where bearish technical trends, leverage concerns, or slowing growth add risk, and the fund also carries exposure to company-specific issues like legal challenges and operational incidents, which investors should watch closely.
ECML vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 124.47M
- Region
- North America
- Expense Ratio
- 0.95%
- Beta
- 0.65
- Issuer
- Euclidean
- Inception Date
- May 18, 2023
- Dividend Yield
- 1.14%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- No Underlying Index
ECML Summary
The Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is a value-focused fund that looks for U.S. companies that appear undervalued but have solid business fundamentals. It doesn’t track a traditional index; instead, it uses its own rules to pick stocks across many sectors, including energy, consumer companies, health care, and technology. Well-known holdings include Fox and Marathon Petroleum. Someone might invest in ECML to get broad diversification while targeting stocks that may be priced cheaply compared with their business strength. A key risk is that value stocks can stay out of favor for long periods, so the fund’s price can go up and down with market sentiment.
How much will it cost me?
This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.95%, which means you’ll pay about $9.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. That’s higher than the average ETF because it’s actively managed, using a more complex, research-driven strategy to pick value stocks rather than simply tracking an index.
What would affect this ETF?
This ETF is heavily invested in U.S. value stocks, with large exposure to energy, consumer cyclical, and materials companies, so it could benefit if the economy stays strong, commodity prices rise, and investors favor cheaper, undervalued shares. On the downside, a slowdown in U.S. growth, falling oil and commodity prices, or tighter regulations on energy and consumer industries could hurt performance, and its active, concentrated approach means results may differ significantly from the broader market.
ECML Top 10 Holdings
ECML is leaning hard into classic value territory, with a clear tilt toward U.S. energy and materials names powering the story. Marathon Petroleum, APA, and HF Sinclair have been rising strongly this year, acting as the fund’s main engine, while Freeport-McMoRan and CF Industries add steady, commodity-linked support with mixed shorter-term moves. On the consumer side, Crocs has been a bright spot over the year but more mixed lately, and Fox is just quietly steady. Overall, it’s a U.S.-centric, value-heavy portfolio where energy leadership is doing most of the heavy lifting.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 EPAM | Epam Systems | 2.67% | $3.32M | $7.25B | -11.71% | 70Neutral |
 FCX | Freeport-McMoRan | 2.13% | $2.65M | $89.71B | 49.70% | 67Neutral |
 CROX | Crocs | 2.67% | $3.33M | $6.88B | 82.36% | 63Neutral |
 HRB | H&R Block | 2.19% | $2.73M | $6.29B | 1.16% | 63Neutral |
 FOXA | Fox | 2.14% | $2.66M | $25.12B | -3.47% | 77Outperform |
 APA | APA | 2.05% | $2.55M | $18.51B | 135.80% | 73Outperform |
 MO | Altria Group | 2.13% | $2.65M | $129.80B | 36.58% | 64Neutral |
 MPC | Marathon Petroleum | 1.99% | $2.47M | $124.89B | 127.33% | 66Neutral |
 CF | Cf Industries Holdings | 1.99% | $2.47M | $18.66B | 48.90% | 72Outperform |
 NUTX | Clinigence Holdings | 1.93% | $2.41M | $1.37B | 60.76% | 74Outperform |
ECML Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For ECML, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of 40.30 is above the 20-day moving average (MA) of 40.30, below the 50-day MA of 40.79, and above the 200-day MA of 38.56, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.08 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 49.01 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 30.83 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for ECML.
ECML Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECML | $40.31 | $44.00(9.17% Upside) | $124.47M | 0.95% | 70Neutral |
 VFVA | $161.30 | $189.21(17.30% Upside) | $966.75M | 0.13% | 69Neutral |
 QVAL | $64.54 | $71.47(10.73% Upside) | $711.29M | 0.28% | 73Outperform |
 LSVD | $35.38 | $43.57(23.16% Upside) | $667.14M | 0.40% | 74Outperform |
 AIVL | $134.49 | $153.96(14.48% Upside) | $424.74M | 0.38% | 72Outperform |
 BUSA | $42.28 | $47.94(13.39% Upside) | $411.68M | 0.60% | 70Outperform |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECML | Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF | 40.30 | 8.35 | 26.12% | |
| VFVA | Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 161.30 | 38.18 | 31.01% | |
| QVAL | Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 64.54 | 19.33 | 42.75% | |
| LSVD | LSV Disciplined Value ETF | 35.38 | 6.50 | 22.50% | |
| AIVL | WisdomTree U.S. AI Enhanced Value Fund | 134.49 | 24.29 | 22.04% | |
| BUSA | Brandes U.S. Value ETF | 42.28 | 8.33 | 24.52% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.