TipRanks
Advertisement

ABLD - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

ABLD

Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD)

Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:―
ABLD’s rating reflects a solid but not outstanding overall quality, driven mainly by strong, income-focused holdings like Newmont Mining, Western Midstream Partners, and Antero Midstream, which combine good profitability, reasonable valuations, and supportive earnings outlooks. The fund is held back somewhat by more mixed names such as Cheniere Energy Partners and Hitachi, where high leverage, declining margins or weaker momentum add risk. The main risk factor is the ETF’s heavy exposure to energy and real-asset companies, which can make performance more sensitive to commodity price swings and sector-specific challenges.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings Performance
Most of the ETF’s largest positions have shown strong gains this year, helping support overall returns.
Focused Real-Asset Sector Exposure
Heavy weighting in energy, industrials, and materials gives investors targeted exposure to real-asset and cash-flow-focused businesses.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is reasonably low for a specialized strategy, allowing investors to keep more of the ETF’s performance.
Negative Factors
Sector Concentration Risk
A large share of the portfolio is in the energy sector, which can make the ETF more sensitive to swings in commodity prices and industry-specific news.
Limited Geographic Diversification
The ETF is heavily tilted toward U.S. companies with only small exposure to Canada, offering little protection if the U.S. market struggles.
Recent Short-Term Weakness
The fund has shown weak performance over the last three months, and one of its top holdings has been lagging, which may signal near-term volatility.

ABLD Historical Chart

ABLD Summary

ABLD is the Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF, which follows the Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders Index. It focuses on real-asset companies that generate strong cash flow, mainly in energy, industrials, materials, and real estate, with most holdings based in the U.S. Well-known names in the fund include Archer Daniels Midland and Simon Property Group. Investors might consider ABLD for diversification and exposure to companies tied to physical assets that can benefit from inflation and long-term economic growth. A key risk is that it is heavily tilted toward energy and other cyclical sectors, so its value can rise and fall sharply with the broader market and commodity prices.
How much will it cost me?The Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) has an expense ratio of 0.39%, meaning you’ll pay $3.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on companies with strong cash flow capabilities, which requires more research and management effort.
What would affect this ETF?The Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) could benefit from rising demand for energy and industrials, as these sectors make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, it may face challenges from interest rate hikes, which could negatively impact real estate investments, and economic slowdowns that might reduce demand for materials and utilities. Its focus on companies with strong cash flow generation provides resilience, but regulatory changes in the energy sector could also pose risks.

ABLD Top 10 Holdings

ABLD is powered by a heavy tilt toward energy and materials, with names like Petrobras and APA doing much of the heavy lifting as they continue to rise on solid cash generation. Newmont and BHP add a steady mining backbone, helping the fund when commodity sentiment is favorable. On the flip side, Gold Fields has been lagging, acting as a bit of a brake on returns, while Cheniere and some midstream players show more mixed momentum. With most exposure tied to North American and U.S.-listed real-asset leaders, this ETF leans into the cash-rich side of the resource economy.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Petroleo Brasileiro SA- Petrobras5.30%$614.80K$155.46B118.86%
69
Neutral
APA4.89%$567.35K$16.60B105.35%
73
Outperform
Hitachi3.95%$458.31K$166.25B15.95%
62
Neutral
Cheniere Energy Partners3.81%$441.49K$30.14B22.37%
61
Neutral
Simon Property3.59%$416.08K$64.29B15.08%
70
Outperform
Newmont Mining3.41%$394.81K$117.55B17.83%
81
Outperform
BHP Group3.24%$376.00K$214.19B47.30%
73
Outperform
Antero Midstream3.06%$355.10K$9.85B10.91%
78
Outperform
Western Midstream Partners2.75%$318.67K$18.52B17.30%
80
Outperform
Canadian Natural2.64%$305.96KC$152.20B71.96%
81
Outperform

ABLD Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price―
Price Trends
50DMA
31.90
Negative
100DMA
31.09
Positive
200DMA
31.14
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.15
Negative
RSI
51.63
Neutral
STOCH
67.72
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For ABLD, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 31.16, equal to the 50-day MA of 31.90, and equal to the 200-day MA of 31.14, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.15 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 51.63 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 67.72 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for ABLD.

ABLD Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
――$11.69M0.39%
68
Neutral
――$97.19M0.87%
70
Outperform
――$91.00M0.85%
68
Neutral
――$89.53M0.59%
72
Outperform
――$87.82M0.75%
70
Neutral
――$86.45M0.65%
63
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
ABLD
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF
31.48
3.83
13.85%
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
―
―
―
STNC
Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF
―
―
―
PFOE
Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF
―
―
―
SOVF
Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund
―
―
―
VAMO
Cambria Value & Momentum ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement