tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

SPUS - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

SPUS

SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS)

Rating:75Outperform
Price Target:
SPUS, the SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF, earns a solid overall rating largely because its biggest holdings—like Apple, Microsoft, and Alphabet—show strong financial performance, positive earnings outlooks, and growth potential in areas such as cloud, AI, and services. Nvidia, Broadcom, Micron, and AMD also support the rating with their focus on AI and semiconductors, though their high valuations and some mixed technical signals, along with risks like leverage at Eli Lilly and valuation concerns at Tesla, introduce added risk. The main risk factor is the fund’s heavy concentration in a handful of large technology and AI-related companies, which can increase volatility if that sector faces a downturn.
Positive Factors
Strong Overall Year-To-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, helped by several well-performing large holdings.
Leading Technology Exposure
A large portion of the fund is invested in major technology companies like Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, giving investors exposure to a sector that has generally shown strong growth over time.
Healthy Fund Size
With a sizable asset base, the ETF appears well-established, which can support liquidity and ongoing fund operations.
Negative Factors
High Concentration in Top Holdings
A few stocks make up a large share of the portfolio, which increases the impact that any single company’s performance can have on the fund.
Heavy Tilt Toward Technology
More than half of the fund is in the technology sector, so a downturn in tech could significantly hurt overall returns.
Limited Geographic Diversification
The ETF is almost entirely invested in U.S. companies, offering little protection if the U.S. market faces broad weakness.

SPUS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

SPUS Summary

SPUS is an ETF that follows the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index, focusing on large U.S. companies while avoiding businesses tied to alcohol, gambling, and traditional interest-based finance. It is heavily invested in technology and includes well-known names like Apple and Nvidia, along with other major American firms. Someone might consider SPUS for broad exposure to big U.S. companies with an added ethical or faith-based screen, which can also provide diversification. A key risk is that it is very concentrated in tech stocks, so its value can rise or fall sharply with the technology sector and overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?The SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) has an expense ratio of 0.45%, meaning you’ll pay $4.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because it is actively managed to ensure compliance with Sharia principles, which requires additional screening and oversight. Despite the higher cost, it may appeal to investors seeking ethical and faith-based investment options.
What would affect this ETF?The SPUS ETF, with its focus on U.S. large-cap stocks and heavy exposure to technology, could benefit from continued innovation and growth in the tech sector, as well as strong performance from top holdings like Nvidia and Microsoft. However, it may face challenges if regulatory scrutiny increases on major tech companies or if economic conditions lead to reduced consumer spending, which could impact sectors like Consumer Cyclical. Additionally, its Sharia-compliant nature limits diversification, excluding industries like financial services, which could affect resilience during market downturns.

SPUS Top 10 Holdings

SPUS is essentially riding the Big Tech and semiconductor wave, with Nvidia and Apple doing much of the heavy lifting as their shares keep rising on AI and services momentum. Microsoft and Alphabet are more mixed, occasionally losing steam and softening the overall tech punch. In the chip corner, Broadcom and AMD have been mostly supportive, while Micron’s choppier path adds some volatility. Tesla, meanwhile, is clearly dragging the fund. With heavy U.S. large-cap tech exposure and minimal presence outside that theme, SPUS is a concentrated bet on America’s digital and AI future.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Nvidia13.88%$429.07M$5.42T19.49%
76
Outperform
Apple11.77%$363.99M$4.57T35.69%
79
Outperform
Microsoft9.50%$293.79M$3.71T-3.01%
79
Outperform
Alphabet Class A5.31%$164.29M$4.33T77.87%
85
Outperform
Broadcom5.18%$160.20M$2.04T38.99%
76
Outperform
Micron2.53%$78.21M$991.12B595.93%
79
Outperform
Eli Lilly & Co2.40%$74.04M$1.12T93.94%
72
Outperform
Tesla2.37%$73.15M$1.30T-2.40%
73
Outperform
Advanced Micro Devices2.02%$62.30M$789.07B172.56%
73
Outperform
Exxon Mobil1.62%$50.16M$629.29B50.99%
74
Outperform

SPUS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
57.13
Positive
100DMA
55.12
Positive
200DMA
52.98
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.61
Negative
RSI
63.79
Neutral
STOCH
92.07
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SPUS, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 57.26, equal to the 50-day MA of 57.13, and equal to the 200-day MA of 52.98, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.61 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 63.79 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 92.07 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for SPUS.

SPUS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$3.08B0.45%
75
Outperform
$9.95B0.39%
71
Outperform
$9.65B0.39%
74
Outperform
$8.61B0.06%
73
Outperform
$8.58B0.12%
73
Outperform
$8.40B0.18%
73
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
59.11
12.14
25.85%
RWL
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
VFLO
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF
VONE
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement