tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

RWL - AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RWL

Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL)

Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:
$124.00
The overall rating of the Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) suggests it is a solid investment option with a balanced mix of strengths and risks. Microsoft and Apple stand out as key contributors to the fund’s rating due to their strong financial performance, strategic advancements in AI and cloud services, and robust growth potential. However, holdings like Cencora and McKesson have lower scores, reflecting challenges such as high leverage and declining free cash flow, which slightly temper the ETF’s overall rating. A notable risk is the concentration in large-cap companies, which may expose the fund to sector-specific volatility.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key positions, such as Microsoft and Walmart, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF’s overall returns.
Sector Diversification
The ETF is spread across multiple sectors, including Health Care, Financials, and Technology, reducing reliance on any single industry.
Healthy Asset Base
With over $6.7 billion in assets under management, the fund benefits from strong investor interest and stability.
Negative Factors
Overweight in U.S. Market
The ETF has nearly all its geographic exposure in the U.S., limiting protection against international market opportunities or risks.
Underperforming Holdings
Some top holdings, like UnitedHealth, have lagged in performance, which could weigh on the fund’s future growth.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The ETF’s expense ratio of 0.39% is higher than some low-cost alternatives, potentially reducing net returns for investors.

RWL vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RWL Summary

The Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) is an investment fund that focuses on large U.S. companies from the S&P 500 Index, but instead of picking companies based on their market size, it chooses them based on how much revenue they generate. This ETF includes well-known companies like Walmart and Amazon, along with others from various industries such as healthcare, technology, and energy. Investors might consider RWL for diversification and exposure to companies with strong revenue streams, which can provide a mix of stability and growth. However, since it tracks the overall market, its value can go up and down with economic conditions.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) has an expense ratio of 0.39%, meaning you’ll pay $3.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than the average for passively managed ETFs because it uses a unique revenue-weighted strategy rather than traditional market-cap weighting, which requires more specialized management.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) could benefit from strong consumer spending and technological advancements, as its top holdings include companies like Walmart, Amazon, and Apple, which are leaders in their sectors. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact sectors like Financials and Consumer Cyclical, which make up significant portions of the ETF's exposure. Additionally, regulatory changes in healthcare or technology could pose risks to major holdings such as UnitedHealth and Microsoft.

RWL Top 10 Holdings

The Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) leans heavily into health care and financials, with names like CVS Health and McKesson providing a steady lift thanks to strong earnings momentum and solid revenue growth. Meanwhile, UnitedHealth has been a mixed bag, showing volatility as rising medical costs weigh on its performance. Tech giants like Apple and Microsoft add a touch of innovation, with Apple’s recent gains standing out, though Amazon’s struggles with AWS margins have held back the fund’s tech exposure. Overall, the ETF’s U.S.-focused portfolio balances stability with growth, but sector concentration in health care could amplify risks if challenges persist.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Walmart3.79%$263.28M$822.56B26.28%
75
Outperform
Amazon3.55%$246.55M$2.44T20.13%
77
Outperform
Apple2.58%$179.27M$3.99T15.12%
78
Outperform
UnitedHealth2.39%$165.84M$333.14B-34.56%
73
Outperform
McKesson2.29%$159.07M$100.08B61.18%
74
Outperform
CVS Health2.29%$158.80M$104.26B46.13%
76
Outperform
Berkshire Hathaway B1.94%$134.49M$1.04T5.90%
69
Neutral
Cencora1.91%$132.71M$65.07B44.82%
59
Neutral
Exxon Mobil1.79%$124.33M$490.40B-1.92%
79
Outperform
Microsoft1.63%$112.92M$4.03T25.49%
83
Outperform

RWL Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
109.68
Positive
100DMA
106.67
Positive
200DMA
102.73
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.87
Negative
RSI
59.33
Neutral
STOCH
83.94
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RWL, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 111.20, equal to the 50-day MA of 109.68, and equal to the 200-day MA of 102.73, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.87 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 59.33 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 83.94 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RWL.

RWL Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$6.92B0.39%
72
Outperform
$8.85B0.07%
76
Outperform
$8.37B0.52%
74
Outperform
$8.33B0.34%
72
Outperform
$8.09B0.61%
79
Outperform
$7.66B0.25%
72
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RWL
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
112.32
16.01
16.62%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
PRF
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement