Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
RSPG - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG)
RSPG, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF, earns a solid overall rating driven by several strong energy holdings with healthy finances and shareholder-friendly policies. Standout positions like ConocoPhillips, EOG Resources, and EQT contribute positively through strong cash flow, stable balance sheets, and attractive dividends, while names such as Kinder Morgan and Marathon Petroleum introduce some caution due to bearish technical trends, leverage, and valuation concerns. The main risk factor is the ETF’s concentrated exposure to the energy sector, which can make performance more sensitive to commodity prices and broader energy market cycles.
RSPG vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 590.51M
- Region
- North America
- Expense Ratio
- 0.40%
- Beta
- 0.32
- Issuer
- Invesco
- Inception Date
- Nov 01, 2006
- Dividend Yield
- 1.88%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index
RSPG Summary
RSPG is the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF, which follows the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. It invests in U.S. energy companies and gives each stock a similar weight, so the fund isn’t dominated by just a few giants. Well-known holdings include Exxon Mobil and Chevron, along with other oil, gas, and energy infrastructure firms. Someone might invest in RSPG to get diversified exposure to the energy sector and potentially benefit from rising energy demand or prices. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in energy stocks, so its value can swing sharply with changes in oil and gas markets.
How much will it cost me?
This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.40%, which means you’ll pay about $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. That’s a bit higher than the average broad, passively managed index ETF because it focuses on a specific sector (energy) and uses an equal-weight strategy, which typically costs more to run.
What would affect this ETF?
RSPG is heavily focused on U.S. energy companies like Exxon Mobil, Chevron, and major refiners, so it can benefit if oil and gas prices rise, energy demand stays strong, or if regulations remain supportive of traditional energy production and infrastructure. On the downside, it could be hurt by falling energy prices, slower economic growth, higher interest rates that pressure stock prices, or tougher environmental rules that increase costs and speed up the shift toward renewables.
RSPG Top 10 Holdings
RSPG is essentially a pure play on U.S. energy, with the fund’s story driven by a broad cast of oil and gas names rather than a single star. Marathon Petroleum and Phillips 66 have been rising steadily, giving the ETF a strong refining tailwind, while APA’s more volatile run adds some extra spark. Integrated giants like Exxon Mobil and Chevron are climbing but more slowly, acting as sturdy anchors rather than rockets. With nearly all exposure in traditional U.S. energy, the fund leans hard into the fossil-fuel cycle and its ups and downs.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 XOM | Exxon Mobil | 4.91% | $29.59M | $670.91B | 39.18% | 74Outperform |
 EOG | EOG Resources | 5.06% | $30.49M | $78.56B | 40.63% | 78Outperform |
 COP | Conocophillips | 4.89% | $29.44M | $160.31B | 52.01% | 78Outperform |
 APA | APA | 5.04% | $30.39M | $15.15B | 90.08% | 73Outperform |
 CVX | Chevron | 4.83% | $29.08M | $415.14B | 36.51% | 71Outperform |
 KMI | Kinder Morgan | 4.87% | $29.32M | $69.48B | 17.26% | 68Neutral |
 PSX | Phillips 66 | 4.80% | $28.92M | $97.79B | 83.66% | 73Outperform |
 MPC | Marathon Petroleum | 4.88% | $29.40M | $106.07B | 101.29% | 66Neutral |
 OXY | Occidental Petroleum | 4.52% | $27.22M | $56.89B | 36.77% | 67Neutral |
 TRGP | Targa Resources | 4.85% | $29.19M | $60.36B | 68.44% | 74Outperform |
RSPG Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPG, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of 110.05 is below the 20-day moving average (MA) of 115.20, below the 50-day MA of 114.03, and above the 200-day MA of 105.36, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -1.80 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 42.59 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 22.54 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for RSPG.
RSPG Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSPG | $110.05 | $119.00(8.13% Upside) | $590.51M | 0.40% | 74Outperform |
 TPYP | $42.32 | $48.38(14.33% Upside) | $875.89M | 0.40% | 70Neutral |
 IEO | $135.27 | $160.68(18.78% Upside) | $823.95M | 0.37% | 72Outperform |
 FCG | $29.03 | $35.68(22.91% Upside) | $609.24M | 0.59% | 71Outperform |
 ENFR | $37.93 | $44.16(16.42% Upside) | $522.15M | 0.35% | 68Neutral |
 FXN | $23.06 | $28.28(22.63% Upside) | $362.44M | 0.63% | 71Outperform |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSPG | Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 110.05 | 29.27 | 36.23% | |
| TPYP | Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 42.32 | 7.70 | 22.26% | |
| IEO | iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 135.27 | 42.50 | 45.81% | |
| FCG | First Trust Natural Gas ETF | 29.03 | 5.46 | 23.19% | |
| ENFR | Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 37.93 | 7.70 | 25.45% | |
| FXN | First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund | 23.06 | 6.71 | 41.03% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.