tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

RSPE - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RSPE

Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
RSPE, the Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF, has a solid overall rating that reflects a portfolio anchored by strong, growing technology and AI-focused companies. Standout holdings like Micron and Qualcomm support the fund’s quality through robust financial performance, positive earnings calls, and strategic positioning in fast-growing AI and semiconductor markets, while other leaders such as AMD and Palo Alto Networks add further growth potential despite some valuation and technical risks. The main factors that temper the rating are weaker names like Centene, which faces profitability and valuation challenges, and the fund’s notable tilt toward tech and AI-related businesses, which can increase sensitivity to that sector’s ups and downs.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains so far this year and over the past month, indicating positive recent momentum.
Strong-Performing Top Holdings
Many of the largest positions, especially in technology-related companies, have delivered strong year-to-date gains that support the fund’s returns.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors, including technology, financials, industrials, and health care, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Negative Factors
Single-Country Concentration
Almost all assets are invested in U.S. companies, so the fund is heavily exposed to the U.S. market and offers little geographic diversification.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
While many top holdings are performing well, at least one notable position has been weak this year, which can drag on overall results.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fees are not especially high but are also not among the very lowest, slightly reducing the net return to investors over time.

RSPE vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RSPE Summary

The Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Scored & Screened Leaders Select Index, focusing on large U.S. companies that meet environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards. Instead of letting the biggest companies dominate, it gives each stock a similar weight, spreading your money across many sectors like technology, health care, and financials. Well-known holdings include Intel and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD). Someone might invest for broad, diversified U.S. stock exposure with an ESG tilt. A key risk is that it can rise or fall with the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) has an expense ratio of 0.20%, which means you’ll pay $2 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an equal weight strategy and incorporates ESG criteria, which require more active management compared to traditional passive funds. However, it may appeal to investors seeking a balanced and socially responsible investment approach.
What would affect this ETF?The RSPE ETF could benefit from growing investor interest in ESG-focused funds and the strong performance of large-cap technology and industrial companies, which are among its top sector exposures. However, it may face challenges if regulatory changes or economic downturns negatively impact ESG criteria or large-cap stocks, particularly in sectors like technology and financials. Additionally, rising interest rates could pressure growth-oriented sectors and reduce demand for equities overall.

RSPE Top 10 Holdings

RSPE’s story is less about one superstar and more about a deep bench of U.S. names, with tech and industrials quietly steering the ship. Western Digital and Seagate are rising on optimism around data and AI demand, while Intel is mounting a steady comeback that helps the fund’s tech sleeve. On the industrial and clean-power side, GE Vernova is adding some spark, and Corning’s steady climb supports the broader mix. Travel names like Expedia and Royal Caribbean are more mixed, and NRG Energy has been lagging, modestly tugging on performance.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Moderna0.93%$637.79K$31.65B151.38%
59
Neutral
Palo Alto Networks0.71%$487.31K$283.67B65.22%
73
Outperform
GE Vernova Inc.0.70%$475.79K$299.11B117.37%
69
Neutral
Charles River Labs0.65%$445.27K$11.11B44.38%
60
Neutral
Take-Two0.64%$440.33K$47.34B7.42%
53
Neutral
Southwest Airlines0.64%$440.12K$24.56B49.53%
66
Neutral
Advanced Micro Devices0.64%$437.22K$844.36B274.48%
73
Outperform
Expedia0.64%$436.69K$32.25B52.00%
80
Outperform
Stanley Black & Decker0.63%$428.46K$14.29B33.56%
68
Neutral
DaVita0.62%$425.46K$15.08B62.94%
59
Neutral

RSPE Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
32.85
Positive
100DMA
31.61
Positive
200DMA
30.49
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.36
Positive
RSI
62.23
Neutral
STOCH
55.07
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPE, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 33.77, equal to the 50-day MA of 32.85, and equal to the 200-day MA of 30.49, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.36 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 62.23 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 55.07 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RSPE.

RSPE Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$68.04M0.20%
71
Outperform
$97.16M0.45%
69
Neutral
$96.55M0.80%
67
Neutral
$93.97M0.35%
73
Outperform
$92.27M0.93%
63
Neutral
$88.28M0.49%
71
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RSPE
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
34.14
6.74
24.60%
ACEP
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF
FCUS
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
JOYT
JPMorgan Equity and Options Total Return ETF
EGGQ
NestYield Visionary ETF
JHDG
John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement