RSPE - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE)
Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains so far this year and over the past month, indicating positive recent momentum.
Strong-Performing Top Holdings
Many of the largest positions, especially in technology-related companies, have delivered strong year-to-date gains that support the fund’s returns.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors, including technology, financials, industrials, and health care, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Negative Factors
Single-Country Concentration
Almost all assets are invested in U.S. companies, so the fund is heavily exposed to the U.S. market and offers little geographic diversification.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
While many top holdings are performing well, at least one notable position has been weak this year, which can drag on overall results.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fees are not especially high but are also not among the very lowest, slightly reducing the net return to investors over time.
RSPE vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM68.04M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.20%
Beta0.80
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateNov 17, 2021
Dividend Yield1.45%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P 500 Equal Weight Scored & Screened Leaders Select Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume13,407
30 Day Avg. Volume11,607
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
38.51Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering185
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RSPE Summary
The Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Scored & Screened Leaders Select Index, focusing on large U.S. companies that meet environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards. Instead of letting the biggest companies dominate, it gives each stock a similar weight, spreading your money across many sectors like technology, health care, and financials. Well-known holdings include Intel and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD). Someone might invest for broad, diversified U.S. stock exposure with an ESG tilt. A key risk is that it can rise or fall with the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) has an expense ratio of 0.20%, which means you’ll pay $2 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an equal weight strategy and incorporates ESG criteria, which require more active management compared to traditional passive funds. However, it may appeal to investors seeking a balanced and socially responsible investment approach.
What would affect this ETF?The RSPE ETF could benefit from growing investor interest in ESG-focused funds and the strong performance of large-cap technology and industrial companies, which are among its top sector exposures. However, it may face challenges if regulatory changes or economic downturns negatively impact ESG criteria or large-cap stocks, particularly in sectors like technology and financials. Additionally, rising interest rates could pressure growth-oriented sectors and reduce demand for equities overall.
RSPE Top 10 Holdings
RSPE’s story is less about one superstar and more about a deep bench of U.S. names, with tech and industrials quietly steering the ship. Western Digital and Seagate are rising on optimism around data and AI demand, while Intel is mounting a steady comeback that helps the fund’s tech sleeve. On the industrial and clean-power side, GE Vernova is adding some spark, and Corning’s steady climb supports the broader mix. Travel names like Expedia and Royal Caribbean are more mixed, and NRG Energy has been lagging, modestly tugging on performance.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moderna | 0.93% | $637.79K | $31.65B | 151.38% | 59 Neutral | |
| Palo Alto Networks | 0.71% | $487.31K | $283.67B | 65.22% | 73 Outperform | |
| GE Vernova Inc. | 0.70% | $475.79K | $299.11B | 117.37% | 69 Neutral | |
| Charles River Labs | 0.65% | $445.27K | $11.11B | 44.38% | 60 Neutral | |
| Take-Two | 0.64% | $440.33K | $47.34B | 7.42% | 53 Neutral | |
| Southwest Airlines | 0.64% | $440.12K | $24.56B | 49.53% | 66 Neutral | |
| Advanced Micro Devices | 0.64% | $437.22K | $844.36B | 274.48% | 73 Outperform | |
| Expedia | 0.64% | $436.69K | $32.25B | 52.00% | 80 Outperform | |
| Stanley Black & Decker | 0.63% | $428.46K | $14.29B | 33.56% | 68 Neutral | |
| DaVita | 0.62% | $425.46K | $15.08B | 62.94% | 59 Neutral |
RSPE Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
32.85
Positive
31.61
Positive
30.49
Positive
Market Momentum
0.36
Positive
62.23
Neutral
55.07
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPE, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 33.77, equal to the 50-day MA of 32.85, and equal to the 200-day MA of 30.49, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.36 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 62.23 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 55.07 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RSPE.
RSPE Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RSPE
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
34.14
6.74
24.60%
ACEP
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF
―
―
―
FCUS
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
―
―
―
JOYT
JPMorgan Equity and Options Total Return ETF
―
―
―
EGGQ
NestYield Visionary ETF
―
―
―
JHDG
John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents