TipRanks
Advertisement

ACEP - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

ACEP

ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:―
ACEP, the ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF, has a solid overall rating driven mainly by strong, growth-focused holdings like Barrick Mining, Parker Hannifin, Lam Research, and Broadcom, which benefit from robust financial performance, positive earnings sentiment, and exposure to themes like AI and aerospace. The rating is held back somewhat by positions such as Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Seagate Technology, where profitability, leverage, and valuation concerns introduce more caution. A key risk factor is the fund’s meaningful exposure to higher-valuation, AI-related and cyclical industrial names, which could be more volatile if growth expectations or economic conditions weaken.
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, suggesting its strategy has worked well in the recent market environment.
Leading Holdings Showing Solid Momentum
Several of the largest positions, including technology, energy, and industrial names, have shown strong or steady performance, helping support the fund’s overall returns.
Broad Sector Diversification
The ETF spreads its investments across many sectors such as technology, financials, materials, energy, and health care, which helps reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.
Negative Factors
High U.S. Market Concentration
With most of its assets in U.S. companies and very limited exposure to other countries, the fund is heavily tied to the direction of the U.S. market.
Noticeable Single-Stock Concentration
The top holdings each make up a meaningful slice of the portfolio, which increases the risk that weakness in a few companies could hurt overall performance.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
While many major positions have done well, at least one key holding has shown weak performance, which can drag on the fund’s results if that trend continues.

ACEP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

ACEP Summary

ACEP is the ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF, an actively managed fund that invests mainly in large U.S. companies with above-average dividend payouts. It doesn’t track a fixed index, but instead picks stocks based on research, aiming for a mix of steady income and long-term growth. The fund is heavily invested in technology, financials, energy, and materials, and holds well-known names like Broadcom, Chevron, and JPMorgan Chase. Investors might consider ACEP for diversification and dividend income, but should remember that its stock prices can go up and down with the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) has an expense ratio of 0.45%, which means you’ll pay $4.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, requiring more research and oversight compared to passively managed funds that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) could benefit from strong performance in the technology sector, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings, as well as steady dividend payouts from large-cap companies like JPMorgan Chase and Walmart. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact dividend-paying stocks and sectors like financials and materials, which are also key components of this ETF. Additionally, regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions affecting U.S.-focused companies could pose risks to its overall performance.

ACEP Top 10 Holdings

ACEP is leaning heavily into U.S. tech and industrial names, with Lam Research and Broadcom acting as the fund’s AI-flavored growth engines, even if their recent moves have been a bit mixed. Seagate and Hewlett Packard Enterprise have been rising more convincingly, giving the tech sleeve fresh momentum. On the value and income side, Chevron and Targa Resources add energy ballast, with Chevron steady to slightly lagging while Targa has been more upbeat. Materials plays like Barrick and Southern Copper are more of a wild card, leaving the fund firmly U.S.-centric but diversified across cyclical sectors.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Lam Research4.13%$4.17M$387.39B117.71%
77
Outperform
Chevron3.99%$4.02M$424.79B42.88%
71
Outperform
Broadcom3.97%$4.00M$1.69T3.83%
76
Outperform
Hewlett Packard Enterprise3.90%$3.93M$93.36B175.24%
68
Neutral
Parker Hannifin3.84%$3.88M$120.68B29.46%
79
Outperform
―3.84%$3.87M―――
Barrick Mining3.78%$3.82M$67.84B21.68%
80
Outperform
Seagate Tech3.76%$3.79M$171.28B253.07%
68
Neutral
Southern Copper3.74%$3.77M$176.21B64.92%
73
Outperform
Targa Resources3.65%$3.68M$62.30B94.87%
74
Outperform

ACEP Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price―
Price Trends
50DMA
20.42
Negative
100DMA
20.12
Negative
200DMA
19.03
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.10
Negative
RSI
42.89
Neutral
STOCH
75.86
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For ACEP, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 20.04, equal to the 50-day MA of 20.42, and equal to the 200-day MA of 19.03, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.10 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 42.89 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 75.86 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for ACEP.

ACEP Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
――$100.80M0.46%
71
Outperform
――$956.53M0.35%
74
Outperform
――$856.37M0.29%
73
Outperform
――$811.47M0.35%
73
Outperform
――$800.84M0.55%
74
Outperform
――$763.64M0.15%
73
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
ACEP
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF
19.96
4.51
29.19%
INFO
Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Large Cap Core ETF
―
―
―
NBCR
Neuberger Berman Core Equity ETF
―
―
―
ROCY
JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF
―
―
―
AFLG
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
―
―
―
SEIQ
SEI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Quality Factor ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement