RSPD - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD)
Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Equal-Weight Approach
The fund spreads its investments fairly evenly across many consumer discretionary stocks, reducing reliance on any single company.
Exposure to Well-Known Consumer Brands
Holdings like Best Buy, Airbnb, Chipotle, Hasbro, and Royal Caribbean give investors access to familiar companies that have shown generally solid business momentum, with some posting strong recent gains.
Focused U.S. Market Exposure
Investing only in U.S. companies keeps the fund tied to a large, well-regulated market that many investors know and follow closely.
Negative Factors
Weak Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered negative returns over the past month, three months, and year to date, showing that it has struggled in the current market environment.
Heavy Concentration in Consumer Cyclical Sector
Almost all of the fund’s assets are in consumer cyclical companies, which can be more sensitive to economic slowdowns and changes in consumer spending.
Several Lagging Top Holdings
Key positions such as DoorDash, Booking Holdings, Chipotle, Norwegian Cruise Line, and Expedia have had weak year-to-date performance, which has weighed on the fund’s overall results.
RSPD vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM370.02M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.40%
Beta0.91
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateNov 01, 2006
Dividend Yield0.99%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume205,844
30 Day Avg. Volume127,397
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
65.43Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering47
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RSPD Summary
RSPD is the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF. It follows an index of U.S. consumer-focused companies in the S&P 500, giving each stock roughly the same weight instead of letting the biggest companies dominate. It holds well-known names like Airbnb and Best Buy, along with retailers, travel companies, and leisure brands that benefit when people spend more on non‑essential items. Investors might consider it for growth and diversification within the consumer sector. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to consumer spending, so it can rise or fall sharply with the economy and overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, meaning you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an equal-weight strategy, which requires more active management compared to passively managed funds that track market-cap weighted indices.
What would affect this ETF?The RSPD ETF could benefit from strong consumer spending trends, particularly in the U.S., as well as innovations in the automotive and retail industries, which are key areas of focus for its holdings. However, economic challenges like rising interest rates or a potential recession could negatively impact consumer discretionary spending, which is cyclical and sensitive to broader economic conditions. Regulatory changes or supply chain disruptions affecting top holdings like Tesla or Ford could also pose risks to the fund's performance.
RSPD Top 10 Holdings
RSPD is a pure U.S. consumer-discretionary play, and its story right now is all about where shoppers are still opening their wallets. Off-price and value-focused names like Ross Stores and Best Buy are rising, giving the fund a solid tailwind, while Garmin’s steady climb adds a tech-flavored boost. On the flip side, housing-sensitive Lennar is clearly lagging, and TJX has been losing steam, tempering overall momentum. With hotels like Marriott and Hilton showing mixed results, the ETF leans heavily on retail resilience rather than any single star performer.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carnival | 2.39% | $8.69M | $33.00B | -13.47% | 78 Outperform | |
| Marriott International | 2.37% | $8.63M | $92.75B | 33.51% | 62 Neutral | |
| Ralph Lauren | 2.33% | $8.50M | $21.14B | 11.86% | 78 Outperform | |
| Garmin | 2.32% | $8.47M | $55.32B | 12.41% | 74 Outperform | |
| TJX Companies | 2.32% | $8.43M | $145.54B | -7.14% | 79 Outperform | |
| Hilton Worldwide Holdings | 2.29% | $8.33M | $71.60B | 22.87% | 67 Neutral | |
| Ross Stores | 2.28% | $8.32M | $74.56B | 52.35% | 80 Outperform | |
| eBay | 2.26% | $8.23M | $47.19B | 19.97% | 70 Outperform | |
| Royal Caribbean | 2.26% | $8.22M | $71.10B | -15.87% | 67 Neutral | |
| Tapestry | 2.23% | $8.13M | $22.94B | 1.06% | 69 Neutral |
RSPD Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
55.35
Negative
55.02
Negative
55.77
Negative
Market Momentum
-1.02
Negative
34.93
Neutral
18.68
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPD, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 52.84, equal to the 50-day MA of 55.35, and equal to the 200-day MA of 55.77, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -1.02 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 34.93 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 18.68 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RSPD.
RSPD Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF
51.83
-5.35
-9.36%
RSPH
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
―
―
―
REZ
iShares Residential and Multisector Real Estate ETF
―
―
―
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
―
―
―
PEJ
Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF
―
―
―
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents