PGJ - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ)
PGJ’s rating suggests it is a reasonably solid but somewhat risky way to invest in leading U.S.-listed Chinese companies. Strong holdings like NetEase and Vipshop, which show robust financial performance, growth initiatives, and attractive valuations, help lift the fund’s quality, while more mixed names like Baidu and JD face bearish technical trends and valuation or growth concerns that weigh on the overall picture. The main risk is the fund’s concentrated exposure to a single country and a relatively small group of internet, consumer, and tech-related stocks, which can make performance more volatile.
PGJ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 76.42M
- Region
- Asia-Pacific
- Expense Ratio
- 0.70%
- Beta
- 0.90
- Issuer
- Invesco
- Inception Date
- Dec 09, 2004
- Dividend Yield
- 2.07%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index
PGJ Summary
PGJ is the Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF, which follows the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index. It invests in companies listed in the U.S. that earn most of their money from China, giving you a simple way to bet on China’s growth. The fund holds well-known names like Alibaba and JD.com, along with consumer, tech, and communication services companies, so you get broad exposure rather than picking individual stocks. Investors might consider PGJ for international diversification and potential long-term growth from China’s economy. A key risk is that it can be very volatile and move sharply with changes in China’s market and regulations.
How much will it cost me?
This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.70%, which means you’ll pay about $7 per year for every $1,000 invested. That’s higher than the average ETF because it targets a specialized slice of the Chinese market rather than following a very broad, plain-vanilla index.
What would affect this ETF?
PGJ could benefit if China’s economy strengthens, consumer spending grows, and technology and internet companies like Alibaba, JD, and Baidu see better business conditions or friendlier regulations. On the downside, slower economic growth in China, tighter rules on online platforms and education, or rising geopolitical tensions and trade restrictions could hurt the fund’s mainly consumer and tech-focused holdings.
PGJ Top 10 Holdings
PGJ is essentially a bet on China’s consumer and internet economy, with heavy exposure to names like Alibaba, JD, Baidu, and NetEase. Lately, those big tech and e-commerce players have been lagging, acting as a headwind for the fund as sentiment around Chinese growth and regulation stays cautious. On the brighter side, consumer-facing names such as Yum China and H World Group have been rising or at least steady, helping cushion the blow. Because the ETF is almost entirely China-focused, investors are getting a concentrated play on Chinese consumer and digital trends rather than a global mix.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 YUMC | Yum China Holdings | 9.22% | $7.04M | $15.68B | 4.76% | 78Outperform |
 JD | JD | 8.17% | $6.24M | $34.88B | -23.04% | 70Outperform |
 BABA | Alibaba | 7.73% | $5.90M | $246.19B | -43.63% | 68Neutral |
 NTES | NetEase | 6.75% | $5.16M | $71.73B | -18.27% | 81Outperform |
 BIDU | Baidu | 5.58% | $4.26M | $25.57B | -37.28% | 64Neutral |
 HTHT | H World Group | 4.53% | $3.46M | $14.50B | 23.02% | 74Outperform |
 BZ | Kanzhun Ltd Sponsored | 4.28% | $3.27M | $7.65B | -25.96% | 78Outperform |
 YMM | Full Truck Alliance | 4.29% | $3.27M | $8.68B | -33.73% | 66Neutral |
 VIPS | Vipshop | 4.15% | $3.17M | $6.12B | -26.94% | 81Outperform |
 EDU | New Oriental Education Tech | 3.79% | $2.89M | $6.84B | -18.95% | 70Outperform |
PGJ Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PGJ, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of 20.82 is below the 20-day moving average (MA) of 21.60, below the 50-day MA of 22.24, and below the 200-day MA of 25.06, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.38 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 32.99 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 6.99 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for PGJ.
PGJ Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGJ | $20.82 | $23.00(10.50% Upside) | $76.42M | 0.70% | 67Neutral |
 MCHI | $49.07 | $69.82(42.29% Upside) | $5.49B | 0.59% | 58Neutral |
 FXI | $33.08 | $47.06(42.26% Upside) | $3.75B | 0.74% | 73Outperform |
 GSJY | $53.28 | $70.56(32.44% Upside) | $97.67M | 0.25% | 71Outperform |
 ECNS | $25.44 | $43.17(69.70% Upside) | $56.30M | 0.59% | 55Neutral |
 FCA | $23.74 | $34.56(45.59% Upside) | $27.18M | 0.80% | 68Neutral |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGJ | Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF | 20.82 | -10.57 | -33.68% | |
| MCHI | iShares MSCI China ETF | 49.07 | -13.30 | -21.32% | |
| FXI | iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 33.08 | -6.03 | -15.41% | |
| GSJY | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 53.28 | 7.50 | 16.37% | |
| ECNS | iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | 25.44 | -8.97 | -26.07% | |
| FCA | First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund | 23.74 | -3.76 | -13.68% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.