MCHI - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI)
Rating:57Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Large, Established Chinese Companies
The ETF’s biggest positions are in major, well-known Chinese firms, giving investors exposure to leading players in the local market.
Broad Sector Spread
Holdings are spread across many sectors, including consumer, communication services, financials, and technology, which helps reduce reliance on any single part of the economy.
Significant Asset Base
The fund manages a large pool of assets, which can support liquidity and make it easier for investors to trade in and out.
Negative Factors
Weak Recent Performance
The ETF has shown negative performance over the year to date and over the last three months, which may concern investors looking for near-term strength.
Heavy Country and Regional Concentration
Most of the fund’s assets are tied to companies listed in Hong Kong and focused on China, increasing exposure to country-specific economic and regulatory risks.
High Fees for a Passive ETF
The expense ratio is relatively high compared with many index-based ETFs, which means more of the fund’s returns are used to cover costs.
MCHI vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM6.27B
RegionAsia-Pacific
Expense Ratio0.59%
Beta0.68
IssueriShares
Inception DateMar 29, 2011
Dividend Yield1.98%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedMSCI China
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume2,251,618
30 Day Avg. Volume3,117,220
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
72.41Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering165
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
MCHI Summary
The iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) is a fund that aims to track the MSCI China Index, giving you broad exposure to Chinese stocks across many sectors, such as consumer, communication, finance, and technology. It holds well-known companies like Tencent and Alibaba, so buying this ETF is a simple way to invest in some of China’s largest businesses in one step. Investors might consider MCHI if they want growth potential from China’s economy and diversification beyond their home market. However, this ETF can be volatile and may rise or fall sharply with changes in China’s stock market and government policies.
How much will it cost me?The iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) has an expense ratio of 0.59%, which means you’ll pay $5.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it tracks a specific international market and requires more active management compared to broad U.S. index funds. It’s still considered reasonable for the exposure it provides to the Chinese equity market.
What would affect this ETF?The iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) could benefit from China's economic recovery and growth in consumer spending, particularly in sectors like consumer cyclical and communication services, which make up a significant portion of the ETF. However, potential risks include regulatory changes in China's technology and financial sectors, as well as global economic uncertainties or geopolitical tensions that could impact investor sentiment and market performance.
MCHI Top 10 Holdings
MCHI is leaning heavily on China’s internet giants, but they’re not exactly firing on all cylinders. Tencent and Alibaba, big weights in the fund, have been lagging lately, putting a drag on overall returns, while consumer names like Xiaomi and Meituan are also losing steam after a mixed stretch. Balancing that weakness, the big state-owned banks—China Construction Bank and Bank of China—have been steadier, even slightly supportive, thanks to more resilient share performance. The fund is firmly China-focused, with a clear tilt toward consumer cyclical and communication-services plays tied to the country’s digital economy.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tencent Holdings | 14.47% | $904.56M | HK$4.20T | -12.49% | 75 Outperform | |
| Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. | 9.41% | $588.42M | HK$2.18T | -3.37% | 70 Outperform | |
| China Construction Bank | 3.91% | $244.38M | HK$2.48T | 11.54% | 82 Outperform | |
| Xiaomi | 2.63% | $164.25M | HK$818.51B | -40.40% | 71 Outperform | |
| Industrial and Commercial Bank of China | 2.46% | $153.92M | HK$3.13T | 23.36% | 78 Outperform | |
| Meituan | 2.32% | $145.13M | HK$569.93B | -23.70% | 74 Outperform | |
| PDD Holdings | 1.93% | $120.82M | $125.71B | -22.93% | 70 Outperform | |
| Ping An Insurance Company of China | 1.91% | $119.32M | HK$1.10T | 10.29% | 72 Outperform | |
| Bank of China | 1.84% | $114.94M | HK$2.08T | 22.81% | 77 Outperform | |
| Netease Inc | 1.79% | $112.08M | HK$648.64B | 1.08% | 80 Outperform |
MCHI Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
53.67
Positive
55.30
Positive
58.24
Negative
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MCHI, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 53.67, equal to the 50-day MA of 53.67, and equal to the 200-day MA of 58.24, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of ― indicates undefined momentum. The RSI at ― is undefined, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of ― is undefined, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for MCHI.
MCHI Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
55.80
-0.60
-1.06%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
―
―
―
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
―
―
―
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China Etf
―
―
―
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
―
―
―
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents