FSEV - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Value ETF (FSEV)
Rating:65Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings Performance
Most of the ETF’s largest positions have shown strong gains this year, helping support overall returns.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, which can help reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The ETF’s fee is reasonable for an actively managed small-cap strategy, allowing investors to keep more of their potential returns.
Negative Factors
Recent Short-Term Weakness
The ETF has experienced weak performance over the past month and quarter, which may concern investors focused on near-term results.
Heavy U.S. Market Concentration
Almost all of the fund’s assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering little geographic diversification if the U.S. market faces a downturn.
Small Fund Size
The ETF manages a relatively small amount of assets, which can sometimes lead to higher trading costs or less liquidity for investors.
FSEV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM7.74M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.28%
Beta0.34
IssuerFidelity
Inception DateApr 28, 2026
Dividend Yield0.64%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume807
30 Day Avg. Volume2,077
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
32.26Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering432
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
FSEV Summary
The Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Value ETF (FSEV) invests in smaller U.S. companies that its managers believe are undervalued, using the Russell 2000 Value Index as its starting universe. It spreads money across many sectors, including financials, industrials, technology, and health care. Top holdings include companies like Commercial Metals Company and UMB Financial. Someone might invest in this ETF to seek long-term growth and diversification by adding smaller, value-focused stocks to a broader portfolio. A key risk is that small-company stocks can be more volatile and can go up and down more sharply than larger, more established companies.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.28%, which means you’ll pay about $2.80 per year for every $1,000 you invest. That’s slightly higher than a typical low-cost index ETF because this fund is actively managed, with managers selecting small-cap value stocks in an effort to outperform the market.
What would affect this ETF?This ETF could benefit if the U.S. economy stays healthy, interest rates stabilize or fall, and investors favor smaller, undervalued companies, which would support its U.S. small-cap value focus and help sectors like financials, technology, and industrials, as well as its top holdings in tech and industrial names. On the other hand, a weaker U.S. economy, rising interest rates that pressure banks and other financials, or a shift in market preference toward large growth stocks could hurt performance, and the active management approach means stock-picking missteps could also weigh on returns.
FSEV Top 10 Holdings
FSEV is leaning heavily on U.S. small-cap financials, with names like UMB Financial, Home Bancshares, Bread Financial, and CNO Financial setting the tone. These banks and lenders have been mostly steady to rising over the year, even if they’ve stumbled a bit lately, giving the fund a core of value-driven financial exposure. Industrial and energy picks such as Fluor and PBF Energy add a more cyclical flavor: Fluor has been mixed and losing steam in recent months, while PBF has been rising sharply, helping offset weaker spots like Commercial Metals. Overall, it’s a U.S.-centric, small-cap value story with financials in the driver’s seat.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial Metals Company | 0.89% | $69.26K | $7.07B | 12.15% | 70 Neutral | |
| PBF Energy | 0.89% | $68.85K | $9.99B | 204.22% | 55 Neutral | |
| Insight Enterprises | 0.87% | $67.24K | $4.80B | 53.50% | 62 Neutral | |
| UMB Financial | 0.86% | $66.97K | $9.90B | 15.29% | 77 Outperform | |
| Fluor | 0.84% | $65.28K | $6.78B | 15.23% | 64 Neutral | |
| Home Bancshares | 0.83% | $64.49K | $5.65B | 5.73% | 77 Outperform | |
| Phillips Edison & Company | 0.80% | $61.61K | $5.30B | 12.99% | 75 Outperform | |
| Bread Financial Holdings | 0.80% | $61.55K | $3.86B | 85.98% | 72 Outperform | |
| CNO Financial | 0.79% | $61.36K | $4.90B | 34.90% | 72 Outperform | |
| Option Care Health | 0.79% | $60.87K | $4.65B | 16.32% | 73 Outperform |
FSEV Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
26.49
Negative
26.29
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.18
Negative
44.19
Neutral
57.75
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FSEV, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 25.86, equal to the 50-day MA of 26.49, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.18 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 44.19 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 57.75 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for FSEV.
FSEV Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
FSEV
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Value ETF
25.82
0.64
2.54%
SQLV
Legg Mason Small-Cap Quality Value ETF
―
―
―
JPSV
JPMorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF
―
―
―
ACSV
American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF
―
―
―
FESC
First Eagle Small Cap Equity ETF
―
―
―
AESL
Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Value ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents