AESL - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Value ETF (AESL)
Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Financial Holdings
Several of the largest bank and financial stocks in the portfolio have shown strong performance this year, helping support the fund’s returns despite overall weakness.
Broad Sector Diversification
The ETF spreads its investments across many sectors, including financials, real estate, health care, industrials, technology, and energy, which helps reduce reliance on any single industry.
Focused Small-Cap Value Strategy
By targeting smaller, value-oriented companies, the fund offers exposure to a part of the market that can outperform over the long term when value stocks are in favor.
Negative Factors
Weak Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF’s overall performance so far this year has been negative, which may concern investors looking for stronger recent results.
High U.S. Concentration
Almost all of the fund’s assets are invested in U.S. companies, providing very limited geographic diversification outside the United States.
Moderate Expense Ratio for a Small Fund
The fund’s fees are not especially low and, combined with its relatively small asset base, may be a drag on returns compared with cheaper, larger ETFs.
AESL vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM1.95M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.40%
Beta0.37
IssuerHarbor
Inception DateAug 26, 2026
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume88
30 Day Avg. Volume4,617
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
22.64Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering102
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
AESL Summary
Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Value ETF (AESL) focuses on smaller U.S. companies that appear undervalued, aiming for long-term growth as their prices catch up to their business results. It doesn’t track a traditional index, but follows a “small-cap value” theme and spreads investments across many sectors like financials, real estate, health care, and technology. Well-known holdings include United Bankshares and Apple Hospitality REIT. Investors might consider AESL to diversify beyond large, well-known stocks and tap into the potential growth of overlooked smaller companies. However, small-cap value stocks can be more volatile and may go up and down sharply with market conditions.
How much will it cost me?AESL has an expense ratio of 0.40%, which means you’ll pay about $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is a bit higher than the average index ETF because AESL is actively managed, focusing on small-cap value stocks and charging more for that specialized, research-driven strategy.
What would affect this ETF?This U.S.-focused small-cap value ETF could benefit if the economy grows steadily, interest rates eventually ease, and investors rotate into undervalued financial, real estate, and industrial companies like its bank and REIT holdings. On the downside, higher-for-longer interest rates, a U.S. recession, or stress in regional banks and property markets could hurt many of its top holdings and make the fund’s already higher short-term volatility more pronounced.
AESL Top 10 Holdings
AESL is leaning heavily on U.S. small-cap financials, with names like Bread Financial and First Bancorp Puerto Rico doing much of the heavy lifting as their shares keep rising and add some spark to recent returns. United Bankshares and Home Bancshares are steadier contributors, helping anchor the fund’s banking tilt. On the flip side, Apple Hospitality REIT has been losing steam, weighing on the real estate sleeve, while Ennis and Essent Group show more mixed momentum. Overall, this is a domestically focused, small-cap value play with a clear bias toward financials and real estate.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United Bankshares | 3.43% | $67.10K | $6.38B | 25.46% | 80 Outperform | |
| Apple Hospitality REIT | 3.21% | $62.75K | $3.82B | 36.14% | 64 Neutral | |
| Ennis | 3.19% | $62.32K | $559.85M | 23.74% | 73 Outperform | |
| First Bancorp Puerto Rico | 3.16% | $61.81K | $4.13B | 21.25% | 76 Outperform | |
| Home Bancshares | 3.16% | $61.65K | $5.84B | 1.66% | 77 Outperform | |
| Bread Financial Holdings | 3.06% | $59.69K | $3.95B | 74.36% | 72 Outperform | |
| Essent Group | 2.43% | $47.42K | $5.73B | -0.61% | 73 Outperform | |
| LiveRamp Holdings | 2.39% | $46.65K | $2.28B | 33.30% | 75 Outperform | |
| Old National Bancorp Capital | 2.21% | $43.23K | $9.75B | 14.49% | 80 Outperform | |
| Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. | 2.02% | $39.55K | $2.70B | 54.15% | 73 Outperform |
AESL Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
Market Momentum
39.96
Neutral
38.85
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For AESL, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 19.67, equal to the 50-day MA of ―, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of ― indicates undefined momentum. The RSI at 39.96 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 38.85 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for AESL.
AESL Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
AESL
Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Value ETF
19.46
-0.45
-2.26%
SQLV
Legg Mason Small-Cap Quality Value ETF
―
―
―
JPSV
JPMorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF
―
―
―
ACSV
American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF
―
―
―
FSEV
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Value ETF
―
―
―
FESC
First Eagle Small Cap Equity ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents