SQLV - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Legg Mason Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV)
Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year and over the past few months, indicating solid recent momentum.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors, including financials, health care, technology, and consumer-related industries, which helps reduce reliance on any single area of the market.
Several Strong Top Holdings
A number of the largest positions, such as Victory Capital, SM Energy, and Cabot, have shown strong year-to-date performance, supporting the fund’s overall results.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively high for an ETF, which means more of the returns are used to cover fees.
U.S.-Only Geographic Exposure
Almost all assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering little geographic diversification if other regions perform better.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some key positions, including DXC Technology, Kyndryl Holdings, H&R Block, and F&G Annuities & Life, have shown weak or negative performance this year, which can drag on the fund’s returns.
SQLV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM38.71M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.60%
Beta0.95
IssuerFranklin
Inception DateJul 12, 2017
Dividend Yield1.05%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume6,100
30 Day Avg. Volume6,529
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
64.50Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering301
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
SQLV Summary
SQLV, the Legg Mason Small-Cap Quality Value ETF, invests in a wide mix of smaller U.S. companies that are considered high quality but currently priced cheaply. It doesn’t track a set index, but instead follows a value theme focused on small-cap stocks across many sectors, including financials, health care, and technology. Well-known names in the fund include DXC Technology and H&R Block. Investors might consider SQLV for diversification and the growth potential of smaller companies. A key risk is that small-cap stocks can be more volatile and can go up and down more sharply than larger companies.
How much will it cost me?The Legg Mason Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) has an expense ratio of 0.6%, meaning you’ll pay $6 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on selecting undervalued small-cap stocks with strong fundamentals.
What would affect this ETF?The Legg Mason Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) could benefit from positive trends in the U.S. economy, such as increased consumer spending or technological advancements, which would support its exposure to sectors like Consumer Cyclical and Technology. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact small-cap companies, particularly those in Financials and Industrials, as they often face higher borrowing costs and reduced demand during such periods. Regulatory changes or sector-specific challenges in Health Care and Energy could also influence the ETF's performance.
SQLV Top 10 Holdings
SQLV is a U.S.-focused small-cap value fund where a few standout names are doing the heavy lifting while several turnaround stories are still stuck in first gear. Energy plays like SM Energy and Crescent Energy have been rising, giving the fund a solid boost, and cybersecurity specialist Qualys has been another steady engine of performance. On the other side, DXC Technology and Kyndryl are lagging, with their restructuring efforts yet to fully pay off, while Kohl’s looks mixed as it wrestles with a tough retail backdrop. Sector exposure is spread across energy, tech, financials, and consumer names, keeping the fund diversified despite its small-cap tilt.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DXC Technology | 0.88% | $338.61K | $1.70B | -24.06% | 62 Neutral | |
| Embecta Corporation | 0.85% | $326.28K | $334.29M | -57.64% | 52 Neutral | |
| Vistance Networks | 0.76% | $292.83K | $1.43B | -60.45% | 60 Neutral | |
| Federated Hermes | 0.76% | $291.89K | $4.32B | 10.86% | 72 Outperform | |
| SM Energy | 0.74% | $286.28K | $8.07B | 29.64% | 72 Outperform | |
| Crescent Energy Company Class A | 0.72% | $277.46K | $4.34B | 43.27% | 66 Neutral | |
| Qualys | 0.71% | $273.43K | $5.97B | 27.35% | 78 Outperform | |
| Forestar Group | 0.69% | $263.87K | $1.35B | -1.35% | 71 Outperform | |
| Kohl's | 0.68% | $262.50K | $2.03B | 18.20% | 68 Neutral | |
| Kyndryl Holdings Incorporation | 0.68% | $260.81K | $2.53B | -62.68% | 64 Neutral |
SQLV Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
53.39
Negative
51.61
Negative
48.30
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.63
Positive
30.51
Neutral
12.65
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SQLV, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 52.57, equal to the 50-day MA of 53.39, and equal to the 200-day MA of 48.30, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.63 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 30.51 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 12.65 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for SQLV.
SQLV Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
SQLV
Legg Mason Small-Cap Quality Value ETF
51.06
8.80
20.82%
JPSV
JPMorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF
―
―
―
ACSV
American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF
―
―
―
FSEV
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Value ETF
―
―
―
FESC
First Eagle Small Cap Equity ETF
―
―
―
AESL
Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Value ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents