EGGS - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS)
Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Technology Leaders
Several major technology holdings, including well-known chip and hardware companies, have shown strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Sector Diversification Beyond Tech
While technology is the largest focus, the ETF also invests in health care, industrials, communication services, and consumer sectors, which can help spread risk across different parts of the economy.
Recent Short-Term Rebound
Despite a weak year-to-date result, the ETF has shown a positive one-month performance, suggesting some recent recovery in its holdings.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively high for an ETF, which means more of the returns are eaten up by fees over time.
Heavy Concentration in Technology
Nearly half of the portfolio is in the technology sector, so a downturn in tech stocks could have a big impact on the fund’s value.
Weak Overall Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF’s year-to-date performance has been negative, indicating that, on the whole, its strategy and holdings have lagged the broader market recently.
EGGS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM58.62M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.93%
Beta0.90
IssuerNestYield
Inception DateDec 26, 2024
Dividend Yield16.67%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume9,982
30 Day Avg. Volume12,298
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
46.14Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusStrong Buy
Number of Analyst Covering21
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
EGGS Summary
NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) is an actively managed fund that focuses on large, established companies, mainly in the United States. It does not track a specific index, but instead selects big, well-known businesses across many sectors, with a heavy tilt toward technology. Top holdings include familiar tech names like Nvidia, Broadcom, and Micron. Someone might consider EGGS for potential long-term growth and some stability from large, proven companies, while still getting diversification across industries. A key risk is that it is heavily invested in tech stocks, so its price can swing up and down more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) has an expense ratio of 0.89%, which means you’ll pay $8.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, meaning professionals are selecting and adjusting the portfolio to try to outperform the market.
What would affect this ETF?The NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS), with its focus on large-cap U.S. companies across diverse sectors, could benefit from strong economic growth and innovation in technology and healthcare, which are its largest sector exposures. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can negatively impact sectors like real estate and consumer discretionary, as well as regulatory changes affecting top holdings like Tesla and Coinbase. Broad market volatility could also influence its performance given its reliance on established companies across multiple industries.
EGGS Top 10 Holdings
EGGS is leaning hard into U.S. tech, with a cluster of chip and data-gear names setting the tone. Seagate, Western Digital, and Credo have been rising together, giving the fund a strong tailwind from the storage and AI-infrastructure theme, while Coherent and Bloom Energy add more growth flavor with somewhat choppier, but still positive, momentum. Lumentum is more mixed and occasionally loses steam, keeping returns from being even stronger. Outside tech, steady showings from Eli Lilly and Caterpillar help diversify the ride but don’t drive the story the way the tech heavyweights do.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 8.34% | $4.81M | $45.11B | 186.37% | 77 Outperform | |
| Seagate Tech | 7.46% | $4.30M | $183.90B | 485.12% | 68 Neutral | |
| Western Digital | 7.35% | $4.24M | $185.78B | 785.47% | 77 Outperform | |
| Coherent Corp | 7.10% | $4.09M | $65.22B | 247.49% | 66 Neutral | |
| Bloom Energy | 6.24% | $3.60M | $77.05B | 1114.20% | 62 Neutral | |
| Lumentum Holdings | 5.79% | $3.34M | $56.66B | 700.84% | 61 Neutral | |
| Intel | 5.11% | $2.95M | $604.88B | 367.95% | 64 Neutral | |
| Cardinal Health | 4.99% | $2.88M | $55.96B | 45.76% | 66 Neutral | |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 4.91% | $2.83M | $1.14T | 58.88% | 72 Outperform | |
| Amgen | 4.49% | $2.59M | $201.93B | 23.94% | 77 Outperform |
EGGS Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
39.72
Positive
36.84
Positive
36.42
Positive
Market Momentum
0.17
Positive
48.61
Neutral
18.39
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For EGGS, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 41.47, equal to the 50-day MA of 39.72, and equal to the 200-day MA of 36.42, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.17 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 48.61 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 18.39 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for EGGS.
EGGS Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
EGGS
NestYield Total Return Guard ETF
40.32
6.17
18.07%
ACEP
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF
―
―
―
FCUS
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
―
―
―
JOYT
JPMorgan Equity and Options Total Return ETF
―
―
―
EGGQ
NestYield Visionary ETF
―
―
―
JHDG
John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents