tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

ZINC - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

ZINC

Zacks Income ETF (ZINC)

Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:
ZINC (Zacks Income ETF) appears to be a solid, income-focused fund, supported by strong, diversified holdings in financials, utilities, and energy. Standout positions like Edison International and T. Rowe Price help the rating through solid financial performance, attractive valuations, and generally positive outlooks, while names such as Unum Group and Pinnacle West Capital introduce some drag due to weaker technical trends, cash flow challenges, and regulatory or profitability risks. The main risk factor is that several key holdings face cash flow, debt, or regulatory pressures, which could affect the stability of their dividends and, in turn, the fund’s income profile.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings Performance
Several of the largest positions, including Seagate Tech and Altria Group, have shown strong gains, helping support the ETF’s overall results.
Income-Focused Sectors
Heavy exposure to traditionally income-oriented areas like utilities, financials, and consumer defensive stocks can help provide a more stable income stream.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings spread across multiple sectors, from utilities and financials to technology and health care, help reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.
Negative Factors
High U.S. Concentration
With almost all assets in U.S. companies, the fund offers little geographic diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. economy.
Sector Concentration Risk
Large weights in utilities and financials mean the ETF could be hit hard if these sectors face pressure at the same time.
Moderately High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost options.

ZINC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

ZINC Summary

Zacks Income ETF (ticker: ZINC) is an actively managed fund that focuses on generating steady income rather than tracking a specific index. It invests mainly in U.S. companies that pay dividends, including utilities, banks, and consumer brands. Well-known holdings include JPMorgan Chase and Altria Group. The fund also mixes in other income-focused investments like real estate and energy partnerships, which can help diversify income sources for investors seeking regular payouts. However, because it targets higher-yielding assets and several sectors, its price and income can still go up and down with interest rates, the broader market, and sector-specific risks.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.55%, which means you’ll pay about $5.50 per year for every $1,000 you invest. That’s higher than the cost of many simple index ETFs because this fund is actively managed and invests across a wide mix of income-focused assets, which typically costs more to run.
What would affect this ETF?ZINC could benefit if interest rates stabilize or fall, since that often supports dividend-paying utilities, financials, and other income-focused sectors, and its global mix of stocks, REITs, and other income assets gives the manager flexibility to seek attractive payouts across regions and industries. On the other hand, rising rates, economic slowdowns that hurt banks and utilities, pressure on high-dividend companies like tobacco, or new regulations affecting energy and real estate income vehicles could reduce payouts or weigh on the fund’s price.

ZINC Top 10 Holdings

ZINC leans heavily on financials and utilities, and that’s where much of the story sits. JPMorgan is a steady engine, helping drive returns, while insurers like Unum quietly add to the income stream. On the defensive side, utilities such as Edison International and Pinnacle West have been more mixed lately, offering yield but not much spark. Energy names like Chevron and Valero are rising and giving the fund a welcome boost, and Seagate’s strong run adds a tech kicker. Overall, it’s a globally flexible, income-first mix with no single stock dominating the show.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Altria Group4.52%$420.00K$114.63B2.14%
64
Neutral
JPMorgan Chase4.31%$400.53K$950.62B18.64%
72
Outperform
Northwestern3.47%$322.70K$4.33B22.27%
74
Outperform
Chevron3.19%$296.53K$398.83B25.69%
71
Outperform
Edison International3.15%$292.40K$27.00B25.01%
77
Outperform
Seagate Tech3.13%$290.42K$188.06B395.68%
68
Neutral
Unum Group3.09%$286.78K$14.73B33.19%
64
Neutral
T Rowe Price3.01%$279.55K$23.73B3.36%
75
Outperform
General Mills2.94%$272.82K$22.21B-15.77%
66
Neutral
Valero Energy2.92%$271.32K$101.45B131.80%
69
Neutral

ZINC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
26.33
Positive
100DMA
200DMA
Market Momentum
MACD
0.08
Positive
RSI
50.09
Neutral
STOCH
25.71
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For ZINC, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 26.54, equal to the 50-day MA of 26.33, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.08 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 50.09 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 25.71 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for ZINC.

ZINC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$9.23M0.55%
67
Neutral
$70.51M0.40%
66
Neutral
$70.20M0.35%
69
Neutral
$23.82M0.49%
70
Neutral
$17.67M0.65%
73
Outperform
$5.04M0.38%
70
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
ZINC
Zacks Income ETF
26.50
1.37
5.45%
PAYR
Federated Hermes Enhanced Income ETF
FDIV
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF
DIVD
Altrius Global Dividend ETF Altrius Global Divid ETF
DVGR
DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF
GENW
Genter Capital International Dividend ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement