TipRanks
Advertisement

WBIF - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

WBIF

WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF)

Rating:70Neutral
Price Target:―
WBIF, the WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF, has a solid overall rating driven mainly by strong, well-run companies like Ross Stores, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Hartford Financial, Trane Technologies, and Lockheed Martin, which show robust financial performance and positive outlooks. Some holdings such as Ball Corporation, HP, and names with bearish technical signals or valuation concerns slightly weigh on the fund’s quality, and there is some risk from exposure to companies facing high leverage, cash flow challenges, or overvaluation. Overall, the mix of strong core holdings with a few more challenged positions shapes a balanced but not top-tier rating.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Fund Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year and over the past few months, showing positive momentum.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings spread across financials, technology, consumer sectors, industrials, and several other industries help reduce the impact if any one sector struggles.
Several Strong Top Holdings
Key positions such as Amphenol, Ball, Lennox International, Interactive Brokers, and McKesson have shown strong or steady performance, supporting the fund’s overall results.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund charges a relatively high fee, which can eat into investor returns over time compared with lower-cost ETFs.
Heavy Tilt Toward Financials and U.S. Market
A large weight in financial stocks and a strong focus on U.S. companies means performance is heavily tied to the health of these areas.
Several Weak Top Holdings
Some major positions, including Kinsale Capital Group, American Express, Yum China, Piper Sandler, and Somnigroup International, have shown weak recent performance, which can drag on the fund.

WBIF vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

WBIF Summary

The WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) is an actively managed fund that looks for U.S. companies the managers believe are “value” stocks—shares that may be priced lower than what the business is worth. It doesn’t track a set index, but spreads money across many sectors like financials, technology, and consumer companies. Well-known names in the fund include American Express and McKesson. Someone might invest in WBIF to seek long-term growth from undervalued companies while staying diversified across the broader market. A key risk is that these value stocks, and the overall market, can go up and down in price, sometimes sharply.
How much will it cost me?The WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) has an expense ratio of 1.52%, meaning you’ll pay $15.20 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, which typically involves more research and trading compared to passively managed funds.
What would affect this ETF?The WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF could benefit from a strong performance in the technology sector, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings, especially if innovation and demand for tech products continue to grow globally. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact value stocks and sectors like financials and consumer cyclical, which are also heavily represented in the fund. Additionally, global regulatory changes affecting major holdings like Apple, Nvidia, and Microsoft could pose risks to the ETF's performance.

WBIF Top 10 Holdings

WBIF’s story is driven by a mix of rising financial and tech names with a few value plays losing steam. Interactive Brokers and HP are doing the heavy lifting, with both stocks trending higher and giving the fund a solid tech-and-finance backbone. Ross Stores and Lockheed Martin are also steady contributors, adding some consumer and industrial punch. On the flip side, Pegasystems and Piper Sandler have been lagging, acting as a bit of a brake. Overall, the fund leans into U.S.-centric value with a global twist through names like Yum China.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
HP2.89%$660.00K$31.02B16.60%
61
Neutral
Pegasystems2.82%$643.67K$5.76B-41.70%
69
Neutral
Piper Sandler2.52%$575.42K$5.11B-18.87%
67
Neutral
Ball2.51%$572.14K$15.92B22.63%
59
Neutral
Lockheed Martin2.50%$571.45K$123.10B11.45%
70
Outperform
Ross Stores2.38%$542.95K$72.39B59.85%
80
Outperform
Broadridge Financial Solutions2.37%$540.09K$18.60B-31.86%
78
Outperform
Trane Technologies2.31%$527.89K$94.41B6.30%
70
Outperform
Hartford Insurance2.28%$520.98K$35.73B0.02%
78
Outperform
Murphy USA2.27%$519.17K$9.67B33.52%
68
Neutral

WBIF Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price―
Price Trends
50DMA
36.32
Negative
100DMA
35.25
Negative
200DMA
33.58
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.31
Positive
RSI
32.99
Neutral
STOCH
3.90
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For WBIF, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 36.32, equal to the 50-day MA of 36.32, and equal to the 200-day MA of 33.58, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.31 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 32.99 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 3.90 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for WBIF.

WBIF Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
――$22.76M1.65%
70
Neutral
――$70.71M0.60%
65
Neutral
――$61.05M0.65%
72
Outperform
――$12.75M0.78%
64
Neutral
――$9.67M0.34%
72
Outperform
――$3.18M0.85%
66
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
WBIF
WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF
35.23
4.59
14.98%
MVPA
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF
―
―
―
DIVL
Madison Dividend Value ETF
―
―
―
ARIA
ARIA Opportunities ETF
―
―
―
PCOV
Principal Equity Premium Income ETF
―
―
―
WCMG
First Trust WCM Global Equity ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement