TipRanks
Advertisement

RWJ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RWJ

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ)

Rating:64Neutral
Price Target:―
RWJ, the Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF, has a solid overall rating driven by several strong holdings like Lincoln National and Group 1 Automotive, which show healthy financial performance, supportive technical or valuation signals, and positive corporate developments. The fund’s score is held back somewhat by weaker names such as World Kinect and United Natural Foods, where profitability, revenue declines, and bearish trends are concerns. A key risk factor is its focus on smaller companies, some of which face financial and operational challenges that can add volatility to the ETF’s performance.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains so far this year and in recent months, suggesting solid momentum in its strategy.
Revenue-Weighted Small-Cap Focus
By weighting companies based on their revenues rather than size alone, the fund tilts toward businesses with meaningful sales, which can help highlight more fundamentally driven small-cap names.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors, with notable exposure to consumer, industrial, financial, technology, and health care companies, helping reduce reliance on any single industry.
Negative Factors
Higher Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of your returns go toward fees compared with many low-cost index funds.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering little geographic diversification if international markets perform differently.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
While several top positions have delivered strong gains, a few key holdings have shown weaker or negative performance, which can create more uneven results for the fund.

RWJ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RWJ Summary

RWJ is the Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF, which follows the S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index. It invests in many smaller U.S. companies across sectors like consumer, industrials, and technology, with well-known names such as CarMax and Kohl’s among its holdings. Because it focuses on small companies and weights them by how much revenue they generate, investors may use RWJ to seek long-term growth and broader diversification beyond large, familiar stocks. A key risk is that small-cap stocks can be more volatile, so the ETF’s value can move up and down sharply with the market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) has an expense ratio of 0.39%, which means you’ll pay $3.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than the average for ETFs because it uses an actively managed revenue-weighted strategy rather than simply tracking a standard index. This approach aims to focus on companies with strong financial fundamentals.
What would affect this ETF?RWJ's focus on U.S. small-cap companies could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like Consumer Cyclical and Technology, which are heavily weighted in the ETF. However, small-cap stocks are often more sensitive to interest rate hikes and economic slowdowns, which could negatively impact their performance. Additionally, regulatory changes or sector-specific challenges in industries like Energy or Financials could influence the ETF's returns.

RWJ Top 10 Holdings

RWJ leans heavily into U.S. small-cap consumer and auto-related names, and that’s where the story really unfolds. CarMax and ManpowerGroup have been rising over the past few months, helping to pull the fund forward, while World Kinect has been a steady, if unspectacular, contributor. On the flip side, Group 1 Automotive, Asbury, and Adient have been lagging, acting like a weight on the portfolio, with Goodyear Tire also losing steam. Overall, the ETF is diversified across sectors but has a clear tilt toward cyclical, U.S.-focused businesses.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
World Kinect2.69%$52.18M$1.80B34.71%
51
Neutral
United Natural Foods2.05%$39.68M$2.70B13.31%
52
Neutral
CarMax1.69%$32.64M$7.82B19.70%
61
Neutral
Lincoln National1.25%$24.22M$7.71B0.37%
71
Outperform
Group 1 Automotive1.21%$23.45M$2.87B-46.37%
73
Outperform
ManpowerGroup1.20%$23.23M$2.58B45.46%
54
Neutral
Kohl's1.06%$20.59M$2.09B16.69%
68
Neutral
GoodYear Tire1.00%$19.37M$1.43B-33.20%
51
Neutral
Asbury0.95%$18.47M$3.09B-31.39%
67
Neutral
Adient0.91%$17.61M$1.30B-29.32%
53
Neutral

RWJ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price―
Price Trends
50DMA
59.99
Negative
100DMA
58.73
Negative
200DMA
55.23
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.94
Positive
RSI
38.34
Neutral
STOCH
27.07
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RWJ, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 58.21, equal to the 50-day MA of 59.99, and equal to the 200-day MA of 55.23, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.94 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 38.34 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 27.07 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RWJ.

RWJ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
――$1.96B0.39%
64
Neutral
――$8.66B0.25%
67
Neutral
――$6.43B0.28%
62
Neutral
――$4.04B0.15%
66
Neutral
――$4.03B0.07%
66
Neutral
――$3.55B0.59%
68
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RWJ
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
57.20
8.83
18.26%
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
―
―
―
FESM
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF
―
―
―
SMLF
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
―
―
―
VIOO
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
―
―
―
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement