TipRanks
Advertisement

FNDA - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

FNDA

Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA)

Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:―
FNDA, the Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF, has a solid overall rating, helped by strong contributors like Abercrombie & Fitch and MKS Instruments, which show robust financial performance, positive earnings calls, and growth in areas such as AI-related technologies. Other holdings like Twilio, Coherent, and Crescent Energy also add support through strategic initiatives and solid fundamentals, though concerns about high valuations, leverage, and some bearish technical signals—especially in names like Delek US Holdings—introduce risk, along with the fund’s notable exposure to smaller, more volatile companies. Overall, the mix of strong growth stories and a few financially challenged or overvalued holdings keeps the fund attractive but not without meaningful risk.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains so far this year and over the last few months, indicating solid recent momentum.
Outperforming Top Holdings
Many of the largest positions, such as Lumentum, MKS, Acadia Healthcare, and several energy names, have delivered strong year-to-date returns that support the fund’s overall performance.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, including industrials, financials, technology, consumer cyclical, real estate, and health care, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Negative Factors
Single-Country Focus
With almost all assets in U.S. companies, the ETF offers very limited geographic diversification and is heavily exposed to the U.S. economy and market conditions.
Small-Cap Volatility Risk
Because the fund targets smaller companies, investors should expect more price swings and sensitivity to economic slowdowns compared with large-cap funds.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The ETF’s fee is not extremely high but is also not among the very lowest, meaning costs will modestly reduce long-term returns compared with the cheapest small-cap index options.

FNDA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

FNDA Summary

FNDA is the Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF, which follows the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Small Index. It focuses on smaller U.S. companies across many industries, including industrials, financials, and technology. Well-known names in the fund include Victoria’s Secret and Coherent Corp. Investors might consider FNDA if they want growth potential and diversification into small-cap stocks that are chosen based on business strength, like sales and cash flow. A key risk is that small-company stocks can be more volatile, so the ETF’s value can go up and down more sharply with the market.
How much will it cost me?The Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) has an expense ratio of 0.25%, meaning you’ll pay $2.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average for actively managed funds because FNDA uses a fundamental indexing strategy, which is more cost-efficient than traditional active management.
What would affect this ETF?FNDA, which focuses on U.S. small-cap stocks, could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like technology and consumer cyclical, which are key areas of exposure. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates or economic slowdowns, which tend to impact smaller companies more heavily due to their reliance on borrowing and market volatility. Regulatory changes or sector-specific disruptions, particularly in industries like real estate or financials, could also influence the ETF's performance.

FNDA Top 10 Holdings

FNDA’s story is all about U.S. small caps, with a noticeable tilt toward industrials, energy, and niche tech names. Rising standouts like ATI and Royalty Pharma are giving the fund a solid lift, helped by momentum in aerospace and biotech royalties. Victoria’s Secret has also been on a tear, adding some consumer flair. On the flip side, MKS Instruments has seen more mixed, recently lagging action, and Par Pacific’s choppy trading has kept returns from really breaking out. Overall, performance is driven by a broad, domestically focused mix rather than any single star.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Abercrombie Fitch0.40%$35.16M$5.78B56.08%
78
Outperform
Twilio0.37%$32.73M$43.70B175.60%
70
Neutral
Compass0.36%$31.99M$7.42B21.79%
61
Neutral
Victoria's Secret0.35%$30.96M$6.69B226.27%
71
Outperform
Factset Research0.33%$29.49M$9.83B-4.16%
78
Outperform
Crescent Energy Company Class A0.33%$29.42M$4.30B35.80%
66
Neutral
Lumentum Holdings0.33%$28.98M$84.83B513.42%
61
Neutral
Coherent Corp0.33%$28.83M$60.78B184.00%
66
Neutral
Par Pacific Holdings0.32%$28.59M$3.96B112.38%
67
Neutral
Match Group0.32%$28.23M$9.57B12.91%
66
Neutral

FNDA Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price―
Price Trends
50DMA
37.12
Negative
100DMA
36.69
Negative
200DMA
34.93
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.45
Positive
RSI
32.67
Neutral
STOCH
18.57
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FNDA, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 36.40, equal to the 50-day MA of 37.12, and equal to the 200-day MA of 34.93, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.45 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 32.67 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 18.57 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for FNDA.

FNDA Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
――$8.84B0.25%
67
Neutral
――$6.44B0.28%
62
Neutral
――$4.12B0.15%
66
Neutral
――$4.12B0.07%
66
Neutral
――$3.74B0.59%
68
Neutral
――$2.89B0.35%
66
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
35.52
4.99
16.34%
FESM
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF
―
―
―
SMLF
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
―
―
―
VIOO
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
―
―
―
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
―
―
―
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement