RSPS - AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS)

Rating:68Neutral

Price Target:

$32.00

The overall rating of the RSPS ETF suggests it is a moderately strong investment option, driven by holdings like Monster Beverage and PepsiCo, which contribute positively with their strong financial performance and strategic growth initiatives. However, weaker holdings such as Estee Lauder, which faces significant financial challenges and declining profitability, may have held back the fund’s rating. A notable risk factor is the ETF's concentration in consumer staples, which could limit diversification and expose it to sector-specific challenges.

Positive Factors

Strong Top Holdings

Several key holdings, such as Monster Beverage and Estée Lauder, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF’s returns.

Stable Sector Focus

The fund’s focus on the Consumer Defensive sector provides stability during economic uncertainty, as these companies tend to perform well regardless of market conditions.

Reasonable Expense Ratio

The ETF’s expense ratio is relatively low compared to actively managed funds, making it cost-effective for investors.

Negative Factors

Sector Concentration Risk

The ETF is entirely focused on the Consumer Defensive sector, which limits diversification and increases vulnerability to sector-specific challenges.

Underperforming Holdings

Some holdings, such as Brown-Forman and Lamb Weston, have lagged in year-to-date performance, dragging down overall returns.

Limited Geographic Exposure

The ETF is fully invested in U.S. companies, offering no exposure to international markets, which could limit growth opportunities.

RSPS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM232.49M

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.40%

Beta0.25

IssuerInvesco

Inception DateNov 01, 2006

Dividend Yield2.86%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedS&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume54,941

30 Day Avg. Volume45,832

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

33.03

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering38

RSPS Summary

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) is a fund that invests in companies within the consumer staples sector, which includes essential goods like food, beverages, and household products. It follows the S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples Index, meaning every company in the fund is equally represented, giving smaller firms the same importance as larger ones. Well-known companies in the ETF include Walmart and PepsiCo. Investors might consider RSPS for its focus on stable, everyday products that tend to perform well even during economic downturns. However, a risk to keep in mind is that the ETF’s performance is tied to the consumer staples sector, which may lag during periods of strong economic growth.

How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) is 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an equal-weight methodology, which requires more active management compared to passively managed funds that track market-cap-weighted indices.

What would affect this ETF?The RSPS ETF, focused on U.S. consumer staples, could benefit from stable demand for essential goods like food, beverages, and household products, especially during economic downturns when these items remain necessities. However, rising interest rates or inflation could negatively impact consumer spending power and the profitability of companies in this sector, while regulatory changes or supply chain disruptions could also pose risks.

RSPS Top 10 Holdings

The RSPS ETF is firmly rooted in the consumer staples sector, featuring household names like PepsiCo and Walmart that provide stability and steady growth. PepsiCo’s innovative strategies and operational efficiency are helping it hold its ground, while Walmart’s strong sales growth and tech-driven initiatives are keeping it on a steady path. On the flip side, Brown-Forman is lagging, weighed down by bearish momentum despite its profitability. Monster Beverage adds a spark with its bullish performance, but the fund’s equal-weight approach ensures no single stock dominates, offering a balanced exposure to U.S. consumer staples.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
BG	Bunge Global	3.25%	$7.53M	$18.93B	14.50%	77 Outperform
EL	The Estée Lauder Companies	3.13%	$7.25M	$34.84B	45.22%	61 Neutral
LW	Lamb Weston Holdings	3.12%	$7.24M	$8.60B	-19.92%	67 Neutral
MNST	Monster Beverage	3.01%	$6.97M	$65.25B	27.78%	80 Outperform
K	Kellanova	2.97%	$6.88M	$28.90B	3.04%	64 Neutral
PEP	PepsiCo	2.89%	$6.71M	$199.75B	-11.78%	78 Outperform
TGT	Target	2.89%	$6.69M	$42.13B	-38.53%	71 Outperform
KO	Coca-Cola	2.87%	$6.66M	$296.38B	5.98%	78 Outperform
WMT	Walmart	2.85%	$6.60M	$806.69B	23.10%	75 Outperform
DLTR	Dollar Tree	2.83%	$6.57M	$20.22B	48.83%	54 Neutral

RSPS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Negative

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

29.56

Negative

100DMA

29.89

Negative

200DMA

29.75

Negative

Market Momentum

MACD

-0.16

Positive

RSI

33.33

Neutral

STOCH

5.80

Positive

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPS, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 29.34, equal to the 50-day MA of 29.56, and equal to the 200-day MA of 29.75, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.16 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 33.33 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 5.80 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RSPS.

RSPS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
RSPS	―	―	$232.49M	0.40%	68 Neutral
IETC	―	―	$998.76M	0.18%	75 Outperform
FXH	―	―	$905.81M	0.62%	71 Outperform
REZ	―	―	$766.27M	0.48%	71 Outperform
RSPH	―	―	$716.65M	0.40%	71 Outperform
FXG	―	―	$265.10M	0.63%	70 Neutral

Performance Comparison

RSPS

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF

28.56

-1.65

-5.46%

IETC

iShares Evolved US Technology ETF

―

FXH

First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund

―

REZ

iShares Residential and Multisector Real Estate ETF

―

RSPH

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF

―

FXG

First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents