tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

RSPS - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RSPS

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS)

Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:
RSPS, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF, has a solid overall rating that reflects a mix of steady, defensive consumer staples exposure with some notable strengths and a few weaker spots. Strong contributors like Kenvue, Dollar General, Sysco, and Target support the fund with solid financial performance, reasonable valuations, and growth initiatives in areas like digital expansion and strategic mergers, while weaker holdings such as Kraft Heinz and, to a lesser extent, Dollar Tree and Philip Morris, weigh on the rating due to profitability challenges, bearish price trends, and high leverage. The main risk factor is that the fund is concentrated in the consumer staples sector, so it is heavily exposed to sector-specific issues like changing consumer demand, inflation pressures, and leverage-related risks across several holdings.
Positive Factors
Broad Consumer Staples Exposure
The fund spreads its investments across many consumer staples companies, helping reduce the impact if any single stock struggles.
Equal-Weight Approach
Each stock is held at a similar size, so the ETF is not overly dependent on a few mega-cap names to drive returns.
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered steady gains so far this year and in recent months, suggesting its holdings have generally been performing well.
Negative Factors
Mixed Top-Holding Performance
Several of the largest positions have shown weak or lagging results this year, which could drag on future returns if the trend continues.
High U.S. Concentration
Almost all of the fund’s assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering little geographic diversification.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fees are not especially low, which means a noticeable portion of returns will go toward covering costs over time.

RSPS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RSPS Summary

RSPS is an ETF that follows the S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples Index, focusing on companies that sell everyday essentials like food, drinks, and household products. Because each company is given similar weight, you’re not overly dependent on a few giants. Well-known holdings include Target and General Mills, along with other familiar brands in groceries and personal care. Investors might consider RSPS for steady, defensive exposure and diversification within the consumer staples sector. However, it can still go up and down with the stock market and is heavily tied to the performance of consumer staples companies.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) is 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an equal-weight methodology, which requires more active management compared to passively managed funds that track market-cap-weighted indices.
What would affect this ETF?The RSPS ETF, focused on U.S. consumer staples, could benefit from stable demand for essential goods like food, beverages, and household products, especially during economic downturns when these items remain necessities. However, rising interest rates or inflation could negatively impact consumer spending power and the profitability of companies in this sector, while regulatory changes or supply chain disruptions could also pose risks.

RSPS Top 10 Holdings

RSPS is a pure U.S. consumer staples play, and its story right now is about steady shoppers with a few standout winners. Archer Daniels Midland and Philip Morris have been rising, giving the fund a lift from agribusiness and tobacco, while Sysco and Kenvue add steady, defensive strength in food distribution and household brands. On the other side, General Mills and Dollar General have been lagging, acting like a small anchor on performance. With nearly all exposure in consumer defensive names, the ETF is tightly focused on everyday essentials rather than flashy growth.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Dollar Tree3.41%$8.41M$24.45B11.78%
61
Neutral
Target3.39%$8.37M$65.63B49.66%
70
Neutral
Dollar General3.37%$8.33M$28.03B15.12%
73
Outperform
Kraft Heinz3.19%$7.88M$30.65B-1.42%
48
Neutral
Sysco3.14%$7.76M$40.76B6.93%
71
Outperform
General Mills3.09%$7.64M$19.08B-26.56%
66
Neutral
Tyson Foods3.09%$7.62M$20.00B10.78%
69
Neutral
Kimberly Clark3.08%$7.60M$36.28B-19.21%
63
Neutral
Kenvue, Inc.3.06%$7.55M$36.94B-14.29%
73
Outperform
Brown-Forman B3.05%$7.52M$13.27B-6.20%
74
Outperform

RSPS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
30.29
Positive
100DMA
29.83
Positive
200DMA
29.77
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.24
Positive
RSI
54.89
Neutral
STOCH
46.13
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPS, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 30.79, equal to the 50-day MA of 30.29, and equal to the 200-day MA of 29.77, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.24 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 54.89 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 46.13 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RSPS.

RSPS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$247.35M0.40%
66
Neutral
$874.29M0.48%
70
Outperform
$837.91M0.61%
67
Neutral
$766.88M0.40%
71
Outperform
$232.30M0.63%
68
Neutral
$107.76M0.61%
69
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RSPS
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF
30.98
0.94
3.13%
REZ
iShares Residential and Multisector Real Estate ETF
FXU
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund
RSPH
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
FXG
First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund
PBJ
Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement