QQQH - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
NEOS Nasdaq 100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH)
QQQH’s rating reflects a portfolio anchored by high-quality tech leaders like Microsoft, Apple, and Alphabet, whose strong financial performance and growth in cloud, AI, and services provide a solid foundation for the fund. Some holdings such as Amazon and Tesla face issues like premium valuations and short-term technical weakness, which can limit upside. The main risk is the fund’s heavy concentration in large technology and AI-focused companies, making it sensitive to downturns in that sector.
QQQH vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 375.51M
- Region
- North America
- Expense Ratio
- 0.68%
- Beta
- 0.73
- Issuer
- Neos
- Inception Date
- Dec 19, 2019
- Dividend Yield
- 9.28%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- No Underlying Index
QQQH Summary
QQQH is an ETF that focuses on large U.S. companies, mainly in technology, and uses an options strategy to seek extra income and some downside protection. It follows a Nasdaq 100–style theme, holding many of the biggest names in the market. Top holdings include well-known companies like Apple and Nvidia, along with Microsoft and Amazon. Someone might consider investing in QQQH to gain diversified exposure to leading tech and growth companies while aiming for regular income. A key risk is that it is heavily tilted toward technology stocks, so its value can rise and fall sharply with the tech sector and overall market.
How much will it cost me?
This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.68%, which means you’ll pay about $6.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. That’s higher than the average index ETF because it uses an active options-based strategy to manage risk and generate income, which costs more to run than a simple passive index fund.
What would affect this ETF?
This ETF is heavily invested in major U.S. technology and internet companies like Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, and Alphabet, so it could benefit if innovation, artificial intelligence, and strong consumer demand keep driving growth in these sectors, especially in a stable or falling interest rate environment. On the other hand, it could be hurt by higher interest rates, slower U.S. economic growth, tighter regulations on big tech, or a broad market downturn that weighs on large-cap growth stocks despite its income and risk-management strategy.
QQQH Top 10 Holdings
QQQH is essentially riding the Big Tech and chip wave, with Nvidia, Micron, and AMD acting as the fund’s turbochargers thanks to their rising momentum in AI and semiconductors. Apple and Microsoft are also pulling their weight, staying steadily positive and reinforcing the tech-heavy tilt. Meta is adding a bit of extra fuel with strong recent gains, while Amazon looks more mixed and Tesla is clearly losing steam, dragging on results. With nearly all exposure in U.S. large-cap tech and communication names, this ETF is a concentrated bet on America’s digital growth engines.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia | 8.03% | $30.17M | $4.93T | 0.86% | 76Outperform | |
| Apple | 7.98% | $29.96M | $5.03T | 26.98% | 79Outperform | |
| Microsoft | 6.14% | $23.05M | $3.88T | -0.73% | 79Outperform | |
| Micron | 4.54% | $17.05M | $1.00T | 294.96% | 79Outperform | |
| Amazon | 4.11% | $15.44M | $2.59T | 7.85% | 71Outperform | |
| Advanced Micro Devices | 3.95% | $14.85M | $824.07B | 98.09% | 73Outperform | |
| Tesla | 3.26% | $12.25M | $1.58T | -9.15% | 73Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class A | 2.60% | $9.78M | $3.41T | -0.58% | 85Outperform | |
| Meta Platforms | 2.89% | $10.87M | $1.57T | -7.72% | 76Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class C | 2.44% | $9.16M | $3.41T | -1.31% | 82Outperform |
QQQH Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For QQQH, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of 52.86 is below the 20-day moving average (MA) of 54.59, below the 50-day MA of 54.33, and above the 200-day MA of 52.41, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.26 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 34.87 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 26.56 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for QQQH.
QQQH Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $52.86 | $61.00(15.40% Upside) | $375.51M | 0.68% | 73Outperform | |
| $27.73 | $33.94(22.41% Upside) | $961.91M | 0.35% | 74Outperform | |
| $44.27 | $53.02(19.76% Upside) | $933.48M | 0.55% | 74Outperform | |
| $54.69 | $67.23(22.94% Upside) | $890.97M | 0.35% | 73Outperform | |
| $33.81 | $42.09(24.48% Upside) | $849.51M | 0.29% | 73Outperform | |
| $52.46 | $69.45(32.38% Upside) | $797.51M | 0.35% | 73Outperform |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQH | NEOS Nasdaq 100 Hedged Equity Income ETF | 52.86 | 2.06 | 4.06% | |
| INFO | Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Large Cap Core ETF | 27.73 | 3.30 | 13.53% | |
| AFLG | First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF | 44.27 | 5.48 | 14.14% | |
| ROCY | JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF | 54.69 | 6.65 | 13.83% | |
| NBCR | Neuberger Berman Core Equity ETF | 33.81 | 2.38 | 7.57% | |
| ROCQ | JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF | 52.46 | 5.44 | 11.57% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.