tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

PAMC - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

PAMC

Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC)

Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:
PAMC, the Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to several strong mid-cap holdings with healthy earnings and growth, such as Medpace Holdings and TechnipFMC, which show robust financial performance and positive momentum. However, names like Pure Storage and HF Sinclair introduce some drag on the rating due to bearish or mixed technical signals, valuation concerns, and profitability challenges. The main risk factor is that many top holdings share issues like potential overvaluation and overbought technical conditions, which could increase volatility if market sentiment shifts.
Positive Factors
Strong Year-To-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, indicating solid recent momentum.
Strong-Performing Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, especially in industrials and energy, have shown strong performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Broad Sector Diversification Within Mid-Caps
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, which can help reduce the impact if any single industry faces a downturn.
Negative Factors
Higher Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively high fee compared with many broad index funds, which can slightly reduce long-term returns.
Short-Term Performance Weakness
The fund’s recent one-month performance has been weak, showing that returns can be volatile over shorter periods.
Heavy U.S. Market Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s holdings are in U.S. companies, offering little geographic diversification if the U.S. market struggles.

PAMC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

PAMC Summary

Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) is a U.S. stock fund that follows the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, focusing on medium‑sized companies. It spreads investments across many sectors, including industrials, financials, energy, and technology, and holds names like Annaly Capital and HF Sinclair. The fund uses a rules-based strategy that shifts between styles such as value, momentum, and quality, aiming for a mix of growth and stability and offering diversification beyond large, well-known stocks. A key risk is that mid-cap stocks can be more volatile than large caps, so the ETF’s value can go up and down with the market.
How much will it cost me?The Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) has an expense ratio of 0.6%, meaning you’ll pay $6 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, using a multi-factor strategy to optimize portfolio performance. Active management typically involves more research and trading, which increases costs.
What would affect this ETF?The Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) could benefit from economic growth in the U.S., particularly in sectors like Industrials and Health Care, which are among its largest exposures. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns may negatively impact mid-cap companies and sectors like Real Estate and Financials, which are sensitive to such conditions. Additionally, regulatory changes or shifts in investor sentiment toward mid-cap stocks could influence the ETF's performance.

PAMC Top 10 Holdings

PAMC is leaning heavily into U.S. financials and real estate, and that’s where most of the action is. Reinsurance Group, Renaissancere, and Unum Group are helping drive returns, with steady-to-rising share prices backed by solid earnings and capital strength. Jones Lang Lasalle adds a real estate twist, riding upbeat results and tech-focused investments. On the flip side, TXNM Energy is lagging and acting like a small anchor on performance, while Annaly Capital’s leverage and profitability concerns keep its contribution more mixed. Overall, it’s a mid-cap, domestically focused play with a clear tilt toward financials.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Renaissancere Holdings2.27%$1.20M$13.50B31.39%
78
Outperform
TechnipFMC2.22%$1.17M$29.94B91.57%
80
Outperform
Illumina2.10%$1.11M$31.17B117.04%
71
Outperform
Everpure2.03%$1.07M$32.72B19.30%
64
Neutral
Tenet Healthcare1.92%$1.02M$21.23B36.75%
74
Outperform
HF Sinclair Corporation1.81%$956.98K$19.17B111.00%
68
Neutral
Reinsurance Group1.75%$929.67K$16.24B29.41%
74
Outperform
TD SYNNEX Corporation1.73%$914.32K$21.53B77.53%
73
Outperform
Medpace Holdings1.61%$851.41K$16.40B19.74%
79
Outperform
Manhattan Associates1.52%$804.09K$11.77B-6.61%
75
Outperform

PAMC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
54.09
Negative
100DMA
53.81
Negative
200DMA
51.22
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.28
Positive
RSI
39.37
Neutral
STOCH
13.92
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PAMC, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 54.01, equal to the 50-day MA of 54.09, and equal to the 200-day MA of 51.22, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.28 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 39.37 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 13.92 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for PAMC.

PAMC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$53.38M0.60%
72
Outperform
$41.71M0.80%
71
Outperform
$35.09M0.59%
68
Neutral
$10.34M0.79%
67
Neutral
$9.27M0.35%
68
Neutral
$5.71M0.32%
69
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
PAMC
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
53.09
6.91
14.96%
KMID
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF
MMID
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF
SMCP
SMART Mid Cap ETF
MCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF
REMC
Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement