tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

MCDS - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

MCDS

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS)

Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:
MCDS, the JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF, has an overall rating that suggests it is a solid but not flawless choice, supported by several strong underlying companies. Standout holdings like Ross Stores, with robust sales growth and strong financial performance, and Quanta Services, with record backlog and rising revenue guidance, help lift the fund’s quality. However, names such as Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Hilton Worldwide, which face profitability, valuation, and leverage challenges, along with exposure to specific sector and market risks, temper the overall rating and highlight the importance of monitoring company- and industry-specific developments.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains so far this year and in recent months, suggesting its strategy has been working well in the current market.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors like industrials, technology, financials, and consumer-related areas, which helps reduce the impact if one industry struggles.
Strong Top Holdings Momentum
Several of the largest positions, such as Western Digital and Teradyne, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund’s overall returns.
Negative Factors
Very Small Fund Size
The ETF manages a relatively low amount of assets, which can sometimes lead to higher trading spreads and a greater risk the fund could be closed in the future.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With the vast majority of its holdings in U.S. companies, the fund offers little geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market’s fortunes.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is not extremely high but is also not among the cheapest, which slightly reduces the net return investors keep over time.

MCDS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

MCDS Summary

The JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) invests in medium‑sized U.S. companies using a data-driven stock-picking approach instead of tracking a traditional index. It spreads money across many sectors, including industrials, technology, and financials, and holds well-known names like Western Digital and Hilton. Investors might consider this ETF if they want diversification beyond large, famous companies, with the potential for both growth and some stability from mid-cap stocks. A key risk is that mid-sized companies can be more volatile than large blue-chip firms, so the share price can go up and down with the market.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) is 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the fund uses an actively managed, data-driven approach to select mid-cap stocks, requiring more research and management effort compared to passively managed ETFs.
What would affect this ETF?The MCDS ETF, focused on U.S. mid-cap companies, could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like technology and industrials, which are significant parts of its portfolio. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which could impact financial and real estate holdings, or economic slowdowns that affect consumer spending and cyclical sectors. Regulatory changes or shifts in energy policy could also influence its performance, given its exposure to energy and utilities.

MCDS Top 10 Holdings

This mid-cap ETF leans heavily on U.S. names, with a clear tilt toward tech and industrials. Western Digital is one of the main engines, rising on renewed optimism around data and AI demand. Vertiv and Quanta Services are also pulling their weight, riding steady demand for data centers and infrastructure. On the softer side, Teradyne has been a bit choppy, and Howmet plus Westinghouse Air Brake are more mixed, occasionally tapping the brakes. Overall, the fund’s story is a U.S.-centric bet on mid-cap tech and industrial momentum.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
4.22%$334.35K
Western Digital2.56%$203.15K$176.38B797.44%
77
Outperform
Howmet Aerospace1.46%$115.44K$100.79B45.72%
67
Neutral
Teradyne1.35%$107.00K$56.03B319.96%
71
Outperform
Quanta Services1.33%$105.72K$104.31B92.36%
78
Outperform
Hewlett Packard Enterprise1.28%$101.26K$65.15B168.70%
68
Neutral
State Street1.22%$96.35K$44.77B64.01%
75
Outperform
Hilton Worldwide Holdings1.21%$95.70K$78.11B36.11%
67
Neutral
Marathon Petroleum1.17%$92.67K$76.49B66.08%
66
Neutral
Ross Stores1.15%$91.36K$73.90B60.20%
80
Outperform

MCDS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
63.52
Positive
100DMA
62.11
Positive
200DMA
60.01
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.61
Positive
RSI
58.73
Neutral
STOCH
15.01
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MCDS, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 64.74, equal to the 50-day MA of 63.52, and equal to the 200-day MA of 60.01, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.61 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 58.73 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 15.01 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for MCDS.

MCDS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$7.81M0.35%
68
Neutral
$47.49M0.80%
68
Neutral
$34.54M0.59%
61
Neutral
$4.58M0.88%
69
Neutral
$3.32M0.32%
70
Outperform
$2.20M0.55%
70
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
MCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF
65.50
10.79
19.72%
KMID
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF
MMID
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF
EPMB
Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF
REMC
Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF
FEMD
First Eagle Mid Cap Equity ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement