MCDS - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS)
Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Year-To-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, suggesting its strategy has worked well in the recent market environment.
Solid Performance From Key Holdings
Several top positions, including energy, technology, and financial names, have shown strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund’s overall returns.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund is spread across many sectors such as technology, industrials, financials, health care, and energy, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Negative Factors
Very Small Asset Base
The ETF manages a relatively small amount of money, which can make it more vulnerable to large investor inflows or outflows and potentially higher trading spreads.
High U.S. Concentration
With the vast majority of its holdings in U.S. companies, the fund offers limited geographic diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. market’s fortunes.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fees are not especially low, meaning a noticeable portion of returns will go toward covering the ETF’s operating costs over time.
MCDS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM9.31M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.35%
Beta0.85
IssuerJPMorgan
Inception DateAug 08, 2024
Dividend Yield1.06%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume55
30 Day Avg. Volume538
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
79.64Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering204
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
MCDS Summary
The JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) is a fund that invests mainly in medium‑sized U.S. companies, using data analysis to pick stocks instead of tracking a traditional index. It spreads money across many sectors like technology, industrials, and financials, and holds well-known names such as Marathon Petroleum and Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Someone might invest in this ETF to seek long-term growth and diversification from a mix of mid-sized companies that can be more dynamic than large blue-chip stocks. A key risk is that mid-cap shares can be more volatile, so the ETF’s value can rise and fall significantly with the market.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) is 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the fund uses an actively managed, data-driven approach to select mid-cap stocks, requiring more research and management effort compared to passively managed ETFs.
What would affect this ETF?The MCDS ETF, focused on U.S. mid-cap companies, could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like technology and industrials, which are significant parts of its portfolio. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which could impact financial and real estate holdings, or economic slowdowns that affect consumer spending and cyclical sectors. Regulatory changes or shifts in energy policy could also influence its performance, given its exposure to energy and utilities.
MCDS Top 10 Holdings
This mid-cap ETF leans into U.S. names with a noticeable tilt toward tech and financials, and a dash of energy. On the upside, Natera and Snowflake are sprinting ahead, powered by strong growth stories in data and precision medicine, while Teradyne is riding the AI hardware wave despite some recent bumps. Marathon Petroleum adds fuel with solid energy exposure, and State Street provides a steadier financial backbone. Westinghouse Air Brake is more mixed, occasionally tapping the brakes on performance but not derailing the fund’s broadly rising trend.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ― | 3.64% | $338.00K | ― | ― | ― | |
| Marathon Petroleum | 1.71% | $158.93K | $111.19B | 119.62% | 66 Neutral | |
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise | 1.31% | $121.48K | $82.42B | 151.07% | 68 Neutral | |
| State Street | 1.23% | $114.01K | $53.13B | 72.00% | 75 Outperform | |
| Cardinal Health | 1.16% | $107.63K | $54.56B | 54.08% | 66 Neutral | |
| Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies | 1.12% | $103.98K | $47.84B | 49.99% | 79 Outperform | |
| Snowflake | 1.08% | $99.91K | $116.07B | 48.76% | 54 Neutral | |
| Natera | 1.08% | $99.80K | $47.41B | 95.20% | 73 Outperform | |
| Teradyne | 1.06% | $98.84K | $59.37B | 238.31% | 71 Outperform | |
| M&T Bank | 1.05% | $97.04K | $34.64B | 20.64% | 76 Outperform |
MCDS Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
68.00
Negative
66.59
Negative
63.40
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.54
Positive
34.78
Neutral
16.25
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MCDS, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 67.85, equal to the 50-day MA of 68.00, and equal to the 200-day MA of 63.40, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.54 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 34.78 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 16.25 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for MCDS.
MCDS Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
MCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF
66.02
8.86
15.50%
KMID
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF
―
―
―
MMID
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
SMCP
SMART Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
REMC
Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
EPMB
Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents