TipRanks
Advertisement

ODDS - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

ODDS

Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS)

Rating:56Neutral
Price Target:―
ODDS, the Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF, has a solid but not top-tier rating, mainly driven by strong, financially healthy gaming and entertainment leaders like NetEase, Tencent, and Evolution Gaming, which provide growth and stability. However, weaker holdings such as DraftKings, Entain, and Roblox, with profitability challenges, high leverage, or bearish technical trends, weigh on the overall quality. The main risk is the fund’s concentration in digital entertainment and gaming, which can make performance more sensitive to sector-specific regulatory and market pressures.
Positive Factors
Global Diversification
The fund invests across several countries in North America, Europe, and Asia, which helps spread risk beyond any single market.
Mix of Strong and Steady Top Holdings
Some of the largest positions, such as Rush Street Interactive, Super Group, Evolution Gaming, and Electronic Arts, have shown strong or steady performance, helping support the ETF’s returns.
Focused Exposure to Digital Entertainment Industries
Heavy weighting in communication services and consumer cyclical sectors gives targeted exposure to companies tied to online gaming, betting, and digital entertainment trends.
Negative Factors
Weak Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF’s overall performance so far this year has been negative, which may concern investors looking for more consistent gains.
Underperforming Key Holdings
Several major positions, including Tencent, Flutter Entertainment, DraftKings, NetEase, Nintendo, and Entain, have shown weak performance, which has dragged on the fund’s results.
Niche Sector Concentration
The fund is heavily concentrated in digital entertainment and related consumer sectors, making it more sensitive to downturns or regulatory changes affecting online gaming and betting.

ODDS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

ODDS Summary

ODDS is the Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF, which follows the BlueStar Global Online Gambling, Video Gaming and eSports Index. It invests in companies tied to video games, eSports, and online gambling around the world, including well-known names like Nintendo and Electronic Arts. This ETF holds game developers, streaming platforms, and online betting firms, giving investors a way to tap into the growth of digital entertainment and diversify beyond traditional sectors. A key risk is that it is heavily focused on gaming and online gambling, so its price can swing a lot with changes in this niche industry.
How much will it cost me?The Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (Ticker: ODDS) has an expense ratio of 0.51%, meaning you’ll pay $5.10 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because it is a sector-focused ETF that requires more active management to track companies in the dynamic video games and eSports industries.
What would affect this ETF?The Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) could benefit from growing global interest in video games and eSports, driven by technological advancements and increasing consumer demand for interactive entertainment. However, potential risks include regulatory changes in gaming markets, economic slowdowns affecting consumer spending, and competition among top holdings like Tencent and Roblox in a rapidly evolving industry.

ODDS Top 10 Holdings

ODDS is leaning hard into global gaming and online betting, with Sweden’s Evolution Gaming and Japan’s Nintendo acting as key engines of recent gains, both riding strong momentum in interactive entertainment. On the flip side, Chinese heavyweights Tencent and NetEase have been losing steam, weighing on returns as regulatory and market pressures linger. U.S. names like DraftKings and Entain in the online gambling space are also lagging, adding some drag. Overall, the fund is tightly focused on digital entertainment, with a truly global mix rather than a U.S.-only story.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Tencent Holdings 8.23%$326.81KHK$4.07T-30.18%
75
Outperform
Evolution Gaming Group AB8.17%$324.51Kkr172.41B4.52%
72
Outperform
DraftKings7.71%$306.24K$19.39B-49.24%
59
Neutral
―7.22%$286.81K―――
Nintendo Co5.12%$203.24K¥9.61T-39.25%
63
Neutral
NetEase4.60%$182.78K$75.21B-22.35%
81
Outperform
Entain plc3.32%$132.00K£3.05B-45.46%
59
Neutral
Super Group (SGHC)3.25%$129.19K$6.27B-5.87%
73
Outperform
Roblox3.15%$125.15K$35.63B-62.28%
51
Neutral
Take-Two2.97%$117.98K$38.43B-18.21%
53
Neutral

ODDS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price―
Price Trends
50DMA
25.27
Negative
100DMA
24.83
Negative
200DMA
25.30
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.21
Positive
RSI
36.70
Neutral
STOCH
12.62
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For ODDS, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 25.31, equal to the 50-day MA of 25.27, and equal to the 200-day MA of 25.30, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.21 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 36.70 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 12.62 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for ODDS.

ODDS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
――$3.95M0.49%
56
Neutral
――$98.49M1.00%
69
Neutral
――$62.43M0.50%
54
Neutral
――$40.13M0.59%
68
Neutral
――$14.14M0.50%
55
Neutral
――$4.72M0.70%
64
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
ODDS
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF
24.18
-10.04
-29.34%
FFND
Future Fund Active ETF
―
―
―
HERO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
―
―
―
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
―
―
―
NERD
Roundhill BITKRAFT Esports & Digital Entertainment ETF
―
―
―
BNGE
First Trust S-Network Streaming and Gaming ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement