MLPI - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI)
MLPI, the NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to several strong core holdings like ONEOK and MPLX, which show robust financial performance, growth potential, and attractive dividend income. Other major positions such as Williams, TC Energy, and Energy Transfer also support the fund with solid operations and income, though high leverage, some bearish technical signals, and pockets of revenue or cash flow weakness in names like Kinder Morgan and Pembina slightly weigh on the rating. The main risk factor is the fund’s concentration in energy infrastructure companies, which ties its performance closely to conditions in the energy sector.
MLPI vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 962.59M
- Region
- North America
- Expense Ratio
- 0.68%
- Beta
- -0.67
- Issuer
- Neos
- Inception Date
- Dec 18, 2025
- Dividend Yield
- 13.45%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- No Underlying Index
MLPI Summary
MLPI is the NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF, an actively managed fund focused on North American energy infrastructure and Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs), mainly in the U.S. and Canada. It invests in companies that own and operate pipelines and other energy transport systems, including well-known names like Enbridge and Kinder Morgan. The fund aims to provide high monthly income by investing in these assets and using options strategies, which may appeal to income-focused investors. However, it is heavily concentrated in the energy sector, so its value can rise or fall sharply with energy prices and industry conditions.
How much will it cost me?
This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.68%, which means you’ll pay about $6.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. That’s higher than the average ETF because it’s actively managed and uses options strategies to try to generate higher income.
What would affect this ETF?
This ETF could benefit if North American energy demand stays strong, pipeline and infrastructure projects expand, and its call-writing strategy continues to generate steady income from holdings like Williams, Enbridge, and Kinder Morgan. On the other hand, it could be hurt by weaker oil and gas prices, stricter environmental rules, or higher interest rates that make its income less attractive compared with safer bonds, as well as any company-specific problems at its major pipeline and midstream holdings.
MLPI Top 10 Holdings
MLPI is essentially a North American energy toll-road play, with big pipeline names like Kinder Morgan, Oneok, and Pembina Pipeline doing much of the heavy lifting as their stocks have been rising on steady demand and solid dividends. Targa Resources and Cheniere Energy add some punch, with strong recent momentum that’s helping drive the fund. On the flip side, Enbridge and TC Energy have been more mixed, occasionally losing steam and tempering overall gains. With a heavy tilt toward energy infrastructure and MLP-style assets, the fund is highly concentrated in the midstream energy story, almost entirely in North America.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 WMB | Williams Co | 9.67% | $93.32M | $90.94B | 29.04% | 76Outperform |
 ENB | Enbridge | ― | ― | ― | ― | 69Neutral |
 TSE:TRP | TC Energy | 8.35% | $80.61M | CAD 93.94B | 27.67% | 70Outperform |
 KMI | Kinder Morgan | 6.81% | $65.73M | $75.45B | 29.87% | 68Neutral |
 OKE | Oneok | 6.55% | $63.25M | $61.20B | 45.49% | 82Outperform |
 TRGP | Targa Resources | 5.08% | $49.07M | $67.54B | 107.89% | 74Outperform |
 LNG | Cheniere Energy | 5.27% | $50.92M | $67.45B | 56.16% | 71Outperform |
 PBA | Pembina Pipeline | ― | ― | ― | ― | 70Outperform |
 MPLX | MPLX | 4.65% | $44.85M | $60.99B | 18.96% | 81Outperform |
 DTM | DT Midstream | 4.44% | $42.88M | $12.68B | 13.37% | 78Outperform |
MLPI Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MLPI, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of 53.91 is above the 20-day moving average (MA) of 52.10, above the 50-day MA of 52.17, and above the 200-day MA of 51.60, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.46 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 64.42 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 89.12 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for MLPI.
MLPI Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLPI | $53.91 | $57.00(5.73% Upside) | $962.59M | 0.68% | 67Neutral |
 EMLP | $44.62 | $48.74(9.23% Upside) | $4.32B | 0.95% | 66Neutral |
 UMI | $61.76 | $67.67(9.57% Upside) | $555.94M | 0.69% | 68Neutral |
 MDST | $29.44 | $32.31(9.75% Upside) | $305.27M | 0.80% | 67Neutral |
 WEEI | $26.13 | $27.36(4.70% Upside) | $117.60M | 0.85% | 75Outperform |
 PIPE | $30.84 | $34.34(11.33% Upside) | $66.78M | 0.75% | 66Neutral |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLPI | NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 53.91 | 10.33 | 23.71% | |
| EMLP | First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 44.62 | 8.13 | 22.27% | |
| UMI | USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF | 61.76 | 16.39 | 36.14% | |
| MDST | Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF | 29.44 | 6.43 | 27.96% | |
| WEEI | Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF | 26.13 | 7.52 | 40.40% | |
| PIPE | Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 30.84 | 8.68 | 39.15% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.