Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
UMI - AI Analysis
Top Page
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI)
Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:
$53.00
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key holdings, such as Williams Co and Antero Midstream, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the fund’s returns.
High Energy Sector Focus
The ETF’s heavy exposure to the energy sector benefits from steady demand and growth in midstream energy infrastructure.
Diversified Geographic Exposure
The fund includes both U.S. and Canadian companies, providing some regional diversification within North America.
Negative Factors
Underperforming Holdings
Some top positions, like Energy Transfer and Enterprise Products Partners, have lagged year-to-date, dragging overall performance.
Sector Concentration Risk
With over 95% exposure to the energy sector, the fund is highly vulnerable to downturns in energy markets.
High Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively high expense ratio compared to many other funds, which can eat into investor returns over time.
UMI vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM375.10M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.69%
Beta0.55
IssuerUSCF Advisers
Inception DateMar 24, 2021
Dividend Yield4.22%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume14,275
30 Day Avg. Volume16,765
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
56.51Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering22
UMI Summary
The USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (Ticker: UMI) focuses on companies in the midstream energy sector, such as pipelines and storage facilities, which are essential for transporting and storing oil, natural gas, and refined products. It includes well-known companies like Enbridge and Energy Transfer and is designed to generate income through investments in Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs), which often offer attractive yields. This ETF might appeal to investors seeking steady income and exposure to the energy infrastructure market. However, it is heavily tied to the energy sector, meaning its performance can be impacted by fluctuations in energy prices and demand.
How much will it cost me?The USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (Ticker: UMI) has an expense ratio of 0.69%, which means you’ll pay $6.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a niche area of the energy sector, requiring more specialized management. It’s designed to generate income through investments in Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs).
What would affect this ETF?The UMI ETF, focused on midstream energy infrastructure and MLPs, could benefit from increased energy demand and investment in North American energy infrastructure, as well as the steady income from MLP distributions. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes, fluctuating energy prices, or reduced demand for fossil fuels due to the global shift toward renewable energy. The performance of top holdings like Enbridge and Energy Transfer will also play a significant role in its future prospects.
UMI Top 10 Holdings
The USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) is heavily focused on North American energy infrastructure, with nearly all its holdings in the midstream sector. Williams Co and DT Midstream are rising stars, benefiting from strong earnings calls and forward guidance, while Kinder Morgan remains steady with solid profitability and a robust project pipeline. On the flip side, Energy Transfer and Enterprise Products Partners are lagging, weighed down by bearish momentum and operational challenges. With its concentration in MLPs, UMI offers income-focused investors exposure to the backbone of the energy supply chain.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Transfer | 8.85% | $33.17M | $58.12B | 3.72% | 71 Outperform | |
| Enbridge | 8.77% | $32.86M | $101.88B | 16.56% | 70 Outperform | |
| Enterprise Products Partners | 7.66% | $28.71M | $67.38B | 7.28% | 74 Outperform | |
| Williams Co | 7.37% | $27.62M | $69.58B | 11.09% | 66 Neutral | |
| MPLX | 6.16% | $23.10M | $51.25B | 13.48% | 78 Outperform | |
| Kinder Morgan | 6.14% | $23.02M | $57.62B | 5.89% | 68 Neutral | |
| DT Midstream | 5.90% | $22.12M | $10.81B | 19.17% | 69 Neutral | |
| Cheniere Energy | 5.60% | $20.98M | $46.40B | 18.34% | 68 Neutral | |
| TC Energy | 4.80% | $17.97M | C$73.07B | 9.81% | 76 Outperform | |
| Antero Midstream | 4.46% | $16.73M | $8.39B | 18.35% | 78 Outperform |
UMI Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
50.08
Negative
49.84
Negative
49.69
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.55
Positive
33.75
Neutral
14.12
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For UMI, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 49.42, equal to the 50-day MA of 50.08, and equal to the 200-day MA of 49.69, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.55 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 33.75 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 14.12 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for UMI.
UMI Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
48.10
3.09
6.87%
EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
―
―
―
IETC
iShares Evolved US Technology ETF
―
―
―
MDST
Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF
―
―
―
PIPE
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
WEEI
Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents