TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

Top Page

UMI

USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI)

Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:$63.00â–²(2.01% Upside)

UMI, the USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF, has a solid overall rating driven mainly by high-quality midstream energy names like MPLX and Oneok, which combine strong financial performance, growth initiatives, and attractive dividend yields to support steady income and potential growth. However, holdings such as Kinder Morgan and Enbridge introduce some caution due to bearish technical trends, high leverage, and valuation concerns, and the fund’s focus on midstream energy means investors are exposed to sector-specific risks if the energy market weakens.

Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date PerformanceThe fund has delivered strong gains so far this year, which suggests its strategy has been working well in the current market.
Leading Midstream Energy HoldingsMany of the largest positions, such as Targa Resources, Plains GP Holdings, and Oneok, have shown strong performance, helping drive the ETF’s overall returns.
Focused North American ExposureWith most assets in U.S. and Canadian companies, the fund targets stable, developed markets that are central to North American energy infrastructure.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration in EnergyBecause the vast majority of the portfolio is in the energy sector, the fund is highly sensitive to swings in energy prices and industry-specific risks.
Relatively High Expense RatioThe fund’s fees are on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the returns are eaten up by costs over time.
Short-Term Performance VolatilityRecent three-month performance has been weak compared with its year-to-date results, showing that returns can be bumpy over shorter periods.

UMI vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM
555.94M
Region
North America
Expense Ratio
0.69%
Beta
0.21
Issuer
USCF Advisers
Inception Date
Mar 24, 2021
Dividend Yield
5.76%
Asset Class
Equity
Index Tracked
No Underlying Index

UMI Summary

UMI is an ETF that focuses on midstream energy companies, mainly in the U.S. and Canada, rather than tracking a traditional stock index. These businesses run the pipelines, storage tanks, and transport systems that move oil and natural gas, and the fund invests heavily in Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) that aim to pay steady income. Well-known holdings include Kinder Morgan and Enbridge. Someone might invest in UMI for income and diversification within the energy sector. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to energy prices and the health of the energy industry, so its value can rise and fall sharply.

How much will it cost me?

This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.69%, which means you’ll pay about $6.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. That’s higher than the average ETF because it focuses on a specialized, income-oriented midstream energy and MLP strategy that requires more active management.

What would affect this ETF?

UMI could benefit if North American energy demand stays strong, more pipelines and storage are needed, and income-focused midstream companies like Energy Transfer, Enterprise Products Partners, and Kinder Morgan maintain steady cash flows and investor-friendly policies. On the downside, weaker oil and gas prices, stricter environmental regulations on pipelines, or rising interest rates that make income investments less attractive could hurt the fund’s performance given its heavy concentration in the energy sector and MLPs.

UMI Top 10 Holdings

UMI is essentially a midstream energy highway play, with big positions in names like Targa Resources and Plains GP providing much of the recent spark as their shares have been rising on strong growth and deal activity. Steady performers such as Enterprise Products Partners, Energy Transfer, and Williams help keep the fund’s income engine humming, while Kinder Morgan adds upside with a more mixed, momentum-dependent profile. Enbridge and DT Midstream have been lagging lately, slightly tapping the brakes. Overall, it’s a North America–focused, pipeline-heavy portfolio with performance driven by a handful of large midstream operators.

UMI top ten holdings
NameCompany NameWeight %Market ValueMarket CapYearly GainOverall Rating
ETETEnergy Transfer8.47%$47.03M$72.00B24.69%70Outperform
EPDEPDEnterprise Products Partners7.58%$42.04M$82.38B20.80%73Outperform
TRGPTRGPTarga Resources7.71%$42.79M$67.54B107.89%74Outperform
WMBWMBWilliams Co7.03%$39.00M$90.94B29.04%76Outperform
KMIKMIKinder Morgan6.29%$34.93M$75.45B29.87%68Neutral
ENBENBEnbridge――――69Neutral
PAGPPAGPPlains GP Holdings5.57%$30.92M$21.63B60.03%72Outperform
DTMDTMDT Midstream5.08%$28.18M$12.68B13.37%78Outperform
MPLXMPLXMPLX5.18%$28.74M$60.99B18.96%81Outperform
OKEOKEOneok4.78%$26.54M$61.20B45.49%82Outperform

UMI Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis SentimentPositive
Last Price61.76

Price Trends

50DMA59.69Positive
100DMA59.61Positive
200DMA57.75Positive

Market Momentum

MACD0.57Negative
RSI65.38Neutral
STOCH93.23Negative

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For UMI, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of 61.76 is above the 20-day moving average (MA) of 59.44, above the 50-day MA of 59.69, and above the 200-day MA of 57.75, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.57 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 65.38 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 93.23 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for UMI.

UMI Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

UMI against its peer funds
NamePricePrice TargetAUMExpense RatioOverall Rating
UMIUMI$61.76$63.00(2.01% Upside)$555.94M0.69%68Neutral
EMLPEMLP$44.62$48.74(9.23% Upside)$4.32B0.95%66Neutral
MLPIMLPI$53.91$58.70(8.89% Upside)$962.59M0.68%67Neutral
MDSTMDST$29.44$32.31(9.75% Upside)$305.27M0.80%67Neutral
WEEIWEEI$26.13$27.36(4.70% Upside)$117.60M0.85%75Outperform
PIPEPIPE$30.84$34.34(11.33% Upside)$66.78M0.75%66Neutral

Performance Comparison

0%10%20%30%40%UMIEMLPMLPIMDSTWEEIPIPEDec '25Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26Jul '26Aug '26Sep '26Oct '26
UMI and its peers over the selected period
Show on chartTickerCompany NamePriceChange% Change
UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF61.7616.3936.14%
EMLPFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund44.628.1322.27%
MLPINEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF53.9110.3323.71%
MDSTWestwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF29.446.4327.96%
WEEIWestwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF26.137.5240.40%
PIPEInvesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF30.848.6839.15%
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.