UMI - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI)
UMI, the USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF, has a solid overall rating driven mainly by high-quality midstream energy names like MPLX and Oneok, which combine strong financial performance, growth initiatives, and attractive dividend yields to support steady income and potential growth. However, holdings such as Kinder Morgan and Enbridge introduce some caution due to bearish technical trends, high leverage, and valuation concerns, and the fund’s focus on midstream energy means investors are exposed to sector-specific risks if the energy market weakens.
UMI vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 555.94M
- Region
- North America
- Expense Ratio
- 0.69%
- Beta
- 0.21
- Issuer
- USCF Advisers
- Inception Date
- Mar 24, 2021
- Dividend Yield
- 5.76%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- No Underlying Index
UMI Summary
UMI is an ETF that focuses on midstream energy companies, mainly in the U.S. and Canada, rather than tracking a traditional stock index. These businesses run the pipelines, storage tanks, and transport systems that move oil and natural gas, and the fund invests heavily in Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) that aim to pay steady income. Well-known holdings include Kinder Morgan and Enbridge. Someone might invest in UMI for income and diversification within the energy sector. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to energy prices and the health of the energy industry, so its value can rise and fall sharply.
How much will it cost me?
This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.69%, which means you’ll pay about $6.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. That’s higher than the average ETF because it focuses on a specialized, income-oriented midstream energy and MLP strategy that requires more active management.
What would affect this ETF?
UMI could benefit if North American energy demand stays strong, more pipelines and storage are needed, and income-focused midstream companies like Energy Transfer, Enterprise Products Partners, and Kinder Morgan maintain steady cash flows and investor-friendly policies. On the downside, weaker oil and gas prices, stricter environmental regulations on pipelines, or rising interest rates that make income investments less attractive could hurt the fund’s performance given its heavy concentration in the energy sector and MLPs.
UMI Top 10 Holdings
UMI is essentially a midstream energy highway play, with big positions in names like Targa Resources and Plains GP providing much of the recent spark as their shares have been rising on strong growth and deal activity. Steady performers such as Enterprise Products Partners, Energy Transfer, and Williams help keep the fund’s income engine humming, while Kinder Morgan adds upside with a more mixed, momentum-dependent profile. Enbridge and DT Midstream have been lagging lately, slightly tapping the brakes. Overall, it’s a North America–focused, pipeline-heavy portfolio with performance driven by a handful of large midstream operators.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Transfer | 8.47% | $47.03M | $72.00B | 24.69% | 70Outperform | |
| Enterprise Products Partners | 7.58% | $42.04M | $82.38B | 20.80% | 73Outperform | |
| Targa Resources | 7.71% | $42.79M | $67.54B | 107.89% | 74Outperform | |
| Williams Co | 7.03% | $39.00M | $90.94B | 29.04% | 76Outperform | |
| Kinder Morgan | 6.29% | $34.93M | $75.45B | 29.87% | 68Neutral | |
| Enbridge | ― | ― | ― | ― | 69Neutral | |
| Plains GP Holdings | 5.57% | $30.92M | $21.63B | 60.03% | 72Outperform | |
| DT Midstream | 5.08% | $28.18M | $12.68B | 13.37% | 78Outperform | |
| MPLX | 5.18% | $28.74M | $60.99B | 18.96% | 81Outperform | |
| Oneok | 4.78% | $26.54M | $61.20B | 45.49% | 82Outperform |
UMI Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For UMI, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of 61.76 is above the 20-day moving average (MA) of 59.44, above the 50-day MA of 59.69, and above the 200-day MA of 57.75, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.57 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 65.38 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 93.23 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for UMI.
UMI Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $61.76 | $63.00(2.01% Upside) | $555.94M | 0.69% | 68Neutral | |
| $44.62 | $48.74(9.23% Upside) | $4.32B | 0.95% | 66Neutral | |
| $53.91 | $58.70(8.89% Upside) | $962.59M | 0.68% | 67Neutral | |
| $29.44 | $32.31(9.75% Upside) | $305.27M | 0.80% | 67Neutral | |
| $26.13 | $27.36(4.70% Upside) | $117.60M | 0.85% | 75Outperform | |
| $30.84 | $34.34(11.33% Upside) | $66.78M | 0.75% | 66Neutral |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMI | USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF | 61.76 | 16.39 | 36.14% | |
| EMLP | First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 44.62 | 8.13 | 22.27% | |
| MLPI | NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 53.91 | 10.33 | 23.71% | |
| MDST | Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF | 29.44 | 6.43 | 27.96% | |
| WEEI | Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF | 26.13 | 7.52 | 40.40% | |
| PIPE | Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 30.84 | 8.68 | 39.15% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.