tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

MIDE - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

MIDE

Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE)

Rating:70Neutral
Price Target:
MIDE, the Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to several strong holdings with healthy earnings and growth outlooks, such as TechnipFMC and United Therapeutics, which show robust financial performance and supportive technical trends. Other key positions like Carpenter Technology, MKS Instruments, and Okta also add strength through solid results and strategic growth initiatives, though their higher valuations and occasional mixed technical signals, along with weaker momentum in names like Pure Storage and nVent Electric, introduce risk. The main risk factor is that many top holdings share themes of high valuation and sometimes bearish or overbought technical indicators, which could make the fund more sensitive to market pullbacks.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains so far this year and over the past month, indicating positive recent momentum.
Leading Holdings Performing Well
Many of the top positions, such as Flex, Entegris, and nVent Electric, have delivered strong year-to-date gains that support the fund’s overall results.
Low Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively low annual fee helps investors keep more of the returns generated by its holdings.
Negative Factors
Small Asset Base
The ETF manages a relatively small amount of money, which can sometimes mean lower trading volume and wider bid-ask spreads for investors.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With almost all assets in U.S. stocks, the fund offers very limited geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market.
Sector Tilts Toward Industrials and Financials
Large weights in industrial and financial companies mean the fund could be more affected if these sectors face a downturn.

MIDE vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

MIDE Summary

The Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) is a fund that follows the S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index, focusing on medium‑sized U.S. companies that meet certain environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards. It holds a mix of businesses across many sectors, including names like Burlington Stores and Illumina. Investors might consider MIDE if they want growth potential from mid-sized companies while also supporting more sustainable business practices and gaining broad diversification across industries. A key risk is that mid-cap stocks can be more volatile than large, well-known companies, so the value of this ETF can go up and down significantly with the market.
How much will it cost me?The Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (Ticker: MIDE) has an expense ratio of 0.15%, meaning you’ll pay $1.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average for ETFs because it is passively managed, tracking an index rather than relying on active stock picking.
What would affect this ETF?The Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) could benefit from increasing investor interest in ESG-focused funds and the growth potential of mid-cap companies, especially in sectors like Industrials and Technology, which are well-represented in its portfolio. However, it may face challenges from economic slowdowns, rising interest rates that could impact mid-cap growth, or regulatory changes affecting ESG criteria. Its focus on U.S.-based companies also makes it sensitive to domestic economic and policy shifts.

MIDE Top 10 Holdings

MIDE’s story is all about U.S. mid-cap muscle, with a clear tilt toward industrials and tech. Sterling Infrastructure, Carpenter Technology, and nVent Electric have been doing the heavy lifting, rising steadily on strong earnings and upbeat outlooks. On the tech side, Entegris and MKS Instruments are also powering ahead, helped by demand in chip-related markets. Not everything is firing, though: Twilio has been more mixed and TechnipFMC has recently lagged, occasionally putting sand in the ETF’s gears. Overall, performance is driven by a diversified but industrial- and tech-heavy U.S. lineup.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Twilio1.29%$44.12K$31.77B71.21%
70
Neutral
Carpenter Technology1.25%$42.73K$29.67B114.31%
75
Outperform
Illumina1.19%$40.81K$28.55B93.17%
71
Outperform
TechnipFMC1.08%$37.06K$26.61B92.78%
80
Outperform
nVent Electric1.04%$35.77K$24.61B110.56%
76
Outperform
Okta1.01%$34.62K$24.58B52.23%
75
Outperform
MKS1.01%$34.60K$24.69B260.21%
75
Outperform
Everpure0.99%$34.05K$24.17B38.48%
64
Neutral
United Therapeutics0.94%$32.29K$23.60B85.87%
79
Outperform
US Foods Holding0.92%$31.48K$22.97B30.57%
74
Outperform

MIDE Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
37.06
Positive
100DMA
35.82
Positive
200DMA
34.34
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.23
Positive
RSI
46.75
Neutral
STOCH
24.26
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MIDE, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 37.77, equal to the 50-day MA of 37.06, and equal to the 200-day MA of 34.34, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.23 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 46.75 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 24.26 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for MIDE.

MIDE Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$3.40M0.15%
70
Neutral
$54.75M0.60%
72
Outperform
$46.71M0.80%
68
Neutral
$35.38M0.59%
69
Neutral
$8.11M0.35%
68
Neutral
$4.64M0.88%
69
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
MIDE
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF
37.79
6.62
21.24%
PAMC
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
KMID
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF
MMID
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF
MCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF
EPMB
Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement