tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

GSEW - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

GSEW

Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW)

Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:
GSEW, the Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF, has a solid overall rating driven by strong contributors like Arista Networks, which benefits from robust financial performance and growth in AI and cloud, and TechnipFMC, which shows healthy financials and a positive trend. Dexcom and T-Mobile also support the fund’s quality with strong earnings and strategic initiatives, though high valuations and some overbought or bearish technical signals introduce caution. Weaker names like Insmed and VG, which face profitability, cash flow, and leverage issues, slightly hold back the rating, and investors should be aware that several holdings show valuation and technical risks even within this diversified large-cap portfolio.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, showing that its equal-weight approach to large U.S. stocks has been working recently.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors, including technology, industrials, financials, health care, and energy, which helps reduce the impact if any one area of the market struggles.
Low Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively low fee means more of the ETF’s returns stay in investors’ pockets instead of going to costs.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering very little geographic diversification outside the United States.
Energy-Heavy Top Holdings
Many of the largest positions are in energy and related companies, which can make the fund more sensitive to swings in oil and commodity markets.
Some Lagging Top Holdings
At least one of the top positions has shown weak performance this year, which can slightly drag on overall returns if that trend continues.

GSEW vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

GSEW Summary

GSEW is the Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF, which follows the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index. It invests in many of the biggest U.S. companies across sectors like technology, finance, health care, and energy, giving each stock roughly the same importance instead of letting giants dominate. Well-known names in the fund include Chevron and PayPal. Someone might invest in GSEW for broad diversification and potential long-term growth of the overall U.S. stock market. A key risk is that the value can rise and fall with the stock market, and no single sector or stock is protected from downturns.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is 0.09%, meaning you’ll pay $0.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average because the fund is passively managed, following an equal-weight index strategy that typically has lower costs compared to actively managed funds.
What would affect this ETF?The Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) could benefit from positive trends in the U.S. economy, such as technological innovation and growth in sectors like technology and healthcare, which have significant weight in the fund. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which could impact financial and real estate sectors, or economic slowdowns that affect consumer spending and cyclical industries. Its equal-weight strategy helps reduce concentration risk but may underperform during periods when a few large companies dominate market gains.

GSEW Top 10 Holdings

GSEW’s equal-weight approach means no single giant calls the shots, but a few themes still stand out. Energy names like Marathon Petroleum and Phillips 66 have been the fund’s workhorses, rising on strong cash flows and upbeat outlooks, while TechnipFMC and Diamondback add more fuel to that energy tilt. Tenet Healthcare has also been a bright spot, helping steady the ship. On the flip side, Constellation Energy and AT&T have been lagging, acting like a small anchor on an otherwise broadly diversified, all‑U.S. large-cap portfolio.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Atlassian0.27%$5.43M$37.83B-4.65%
66
Neutral
Insmed0.27%$5.41M$28.63B19.36%
43
Neutral
Twilio0.26%$5.23M$36.62B170.51%
70
Neutral
Airbnb0.24%$4.90M$106.33B56.13%
71
Outperform
SpaceX0.24%$4.84M$1.77T
Natera0.23%$4.67M$46.13B102.72%
73
Outperform
Uber Technologies0.23%$4.67M$153.23B-13.86%
74
Outperform
Everpure0.23%$4.65M$29.93B70.88%
64
Neutral
Venture Global, Inc. Class A0.23%$4.61M$32.94B18.14%
58
Neutral
Newmont Mining0.22%$4.51M$119.05B70.26%
81
Outperform

GSEW Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
94.43
Positive
100DMA
91.44
Positive
200DMA
88.56
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.00
Negative
RSI
68.90
Neutral
STOCH
96.68
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GSEW, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 95.53, equal to the 50-day MA of 94.43, and equal to the 200-day MA of 88.56, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.00 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 68.90 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 96.68 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GSEW.

GSEW Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$2.03B0.09%
70
Outperform
$9.95B0.39%
71
Outperform
$9.65B0.39%
74
Outperform
$8.61B0.06%
73
Outperform
$8.58B0.12%
73
Outperform
$8.40B0.18%
73
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
98.13
16.46
20.15%
RWL
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
VFLO
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF
VONE
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement