FFSM - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM)
Rating:70Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Year-To-Date Results
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, showing solid recent performance for investors.
Top Holdings With Strong Momentum
Several of the largest positions, including key industrial and technology names, have shown strong price gains, helping drive the fund’s returns.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings spread across many sectors, with meaningful weights in industrials, technology, financials, and consumer companies, help reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Negative Factors
Recent Short-Term Pullback
The ETF has slipped over the past month, which may signal near-term volatility even though longer-term performance has been stronger.
High U.S. Concentration
Almost all assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering very little geographic diversification outside the United States.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fees are not especially low for an ETF, which can slightly reduce net returns over time compared with cheaper options.
FFSM vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM1.58B
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.43%
Beta0.97
IssuerFidelity
Inception DateFeb 02, 2021
Dividend Yield0.44%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume263,022
30 Day Avg. Volume241,900
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
45.78Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering216
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
FFSM Summary
The Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) focuses on smaller and mid-sized U.S. companies that are not usually in the big-name indexes. It does not track a set index, but instead selects firms with solid earnings, cash flow, and balance sheets across many sectors like industrials, technology, and financials. Well-known holdings include Western Digital and TD SYNNEX. An investor might choose this ETF for growth potential and added diversification beyond large-cap stocks. A key risk is that smaller companies can be more volatile, so the share price can rise and fall more sharply than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) has an expense ratio of 0.43%, meaning you’ll pay $4.30 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed, focusing on selecting small to mid-cap companies with strong fundamentals rather than tracking a broad index.
What would affect this ETF?The Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) could benefit from economic growth and innovation, as its focus on small to mid-sized companies with strong fundamentals positions it to capitalize on emerging opportunities in sectors like Industrials, Technology, and Consumer Cyclical. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for smaller companies, or economic slowdowns that could disproportionately impact these less established firms. Additionally, its global exposure could make it vulnerable to geopolitical tensions or international market volatility.
FFSM Top 10 Holdings
FFSM is leaning heavily into industrial and tech-focused small and mid caps, with names like ATI and TechnipFMC quietly powering the fund thanks to steady, rising momentum tied to aerospace and energy demand. Sterling Infrastructure, despite a strong year overall, has been losing steam lately and slightly weighing on short-term results, while MACOM’s mixed profile and profitability concerns add some drag from the semiconductor side. With most of these holdings U.S.-based and clustered in industrials and technology, the fund is a targeted bet on smaller domestic growth engines rather than a broad global mix.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IES Holdings | 1.68% | $25.02M | $12.85B | 84.52% | 76 Outperform | |
| ATI | 1.58% | $23.53M | $28.68B | 171.35% | 78 Outperform | |
| TD SYNNEX Corporation | 1.53% | $22.79M | $21.00B | 75.66% | 73 Outperform | |
| Jones Lang Lasalle | 1.46% | $21.77M | $16.67B | 16.33% | 79 Outperform | |
| Performance Food Group | 1.39% | $20.65M | $15.54B | -6.44% | 65 Neutral | |
| FirstCash | 1.35% | $20.05M | $9.79B | 53.35% | 74 Outperform | |
| Carpenter Technology | 1.32% | $19.69M | $23.56B | 92.11% | 75 Outperform | |
| Sterling Infrastructure | 1.31% | $19.48M | $14.88B | 70.11% | 71 Outperform | |
| Sanmina-Sci | 1.25% | $18.65M | $10.64B | 64.12% | 79 Outperform | |
| ITT | 1.21% | $17.97M | $18.27B | 19.58% | 72 Outperform |
FFSM Technical Analysis
Neutral
―
Price Trends
37.13
Negative
36.52
Negative
34.33
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.30
Positive
43.59
Neutral
30.19
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FFSM, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 37.19, equal to the 50-day MA of 37.13, and equal to the 200-day MA of 34.33, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.30 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 43.59 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 30.19 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for FFSM.
FFSM Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
FFSM
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
36.48
7.21
24.63%
BLCR
BlackRock Large Cap Core ETF
―
―
―
JGLO
JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF
―
―
―
CGDG
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
―
―
―
CGGE
Capital Group Global Equity ETF
―
―
―
BDYN
iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents