tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

EUSA - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

EUSA

iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA)

Rating:70Neutral
Price Target:
EUSA, the iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF, has a solid overall rating driven by several strong holdings with healthy growth and earnings trends, such as Credo Technology Group, Applied Materials, SharkNinja, and Okta, which all show robust financial performance and positive momentum or strategic positioning in areas like AI and technology. The fund’s rating is held back somewhat by weaker names like Snowflake and Axon, where profitability, leverage, and bearish technical signals are concerns, and by broader risks around high valuations and operational challenges across several tech-focused holdings, which could increase volatility. Overall, the mix of strong growth stories and some more challenged positions results in a balanced but not top-tier assessment.
Positive Factors
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, which helps reduce the impact if any single industry runs into trouble.
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains so far this year, indicating that its overall portfolio has been working well for investors.
Low Expense Ratio
The fund charges relatively low fees, so more of the investment returns stay in investors’ pockets instead of going to costs.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Market Focus
Almost all of the ETF’s holdings are in U.S. companies, which means performance is highly tied to the health of the U.S. market.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
While several top positions have delivered strong gains, at least one has been weak recently, which can drag on overall results.
Limited Single-Stock Upside
Because the fund is equal-weighted and each holding is a very small part of the portfolio, even very strong individual stock performance has only a modest impact on the ETF’s returns.

EUSA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

EUSA Summary

EUSA is an ETF that follows the MSCI USA Equal Weighted index, meaning it invests in a wide range of U.S. companies and gives each stock roughly the same importance instead of favoring the biggest ones. It holds well-known names like Dell Technologies and Best Buy, along with many other tech, financial, industrial, and healthcare companies. Someone might invest in EUSA to get broad, diversified exposure to the U.S. stock market, including large, mid, and smaller companies, without being overly concentrated in mega-cap stocks. A key risk is that its value can go up and down with the overall U.S. stock market.
How much will it cost me?The iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) has an expense ratio of 0.09%, which means you’ll pay $0.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average because it’s passively managed, tracking an equal-weighted index rather than relying on active stock selection.
What would affect this ETF?The EUSA ETF, with its equal-weighted approach and broad exposure to the U.S. market, could benefit from growth in sectors like technology and healthcare, which are significant parts of its portfolio. However, it may face challenges if economic conditions worsen, particularly impacting cyclical sectors like consumer discretionary and industrials, or if rising interest rates negatively affect financial and real estate stocks. Regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions could also influence the performance of its top holdings in technology and healthcare.

EUSA Top 10 Holdings

EUSA’s equal-weight approach means no single stock runs the show, but a few names still color its recent story. In tech, Snowflake and NetApp have been rising on AI-driven optimism, helping keep performance buoyant, while Dell’s mixed results and leverage issues leave it lagging a bit. On the consumer side, Best Buy and SharkNinja are quietly pulling their weight, with steady to rising trends that support the fund. International Paper, by contrast, is losing steam, reflecting broader industrial headwinds. Overall, it’s a diversified, all‑U.S. mix with a tilt toward technology and cyclicals rather than any one mega-cap giant.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Snowflake0.35%$6.71M$114.55B74.50%
54
Neutral
Dell Technologies0.34%$6.61M$294.17B231.03%
65
Neutral
SharkNinja, Inc.0.32%$6.21M$26.13B62.08%
76
Outperform
Okta0.31%$5.98M$25.78B70.34%
75
Outperform
Atlassian0.31%$5.92M$37.83B-4.65%
66
Neutral
Hewlett Packard Enterprise0.30%$5.70M$70.47B165.56%
68
Neutral
NetApp0.29%$5.60M$37.19B87.68%
76
Outperform
Natera0.29%$5.53M$46.13B102.72%
73
Outperform
Palo Alto Networks0.28%$5.45M$296.55B128.96%
73
Outperform
Toast Inc0.27%$5.23M$20.03B-17.50%
73
Outperform

EUSA Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
113.94
Positive
100DMA
110.13
Positive
200DMA
106.98
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.10
Negative
RSI
66.22
Neutral
STOCH
88.35
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For EUSA, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 115.13, equal to the 50-day MA of 113.94, and equal to the 200-day MA of 106.98, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.10 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 66.22 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 88.35 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for EUSA.

EUSA Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$1.91B0.09%
70
Neutral
$9.21B0.02%
74
Outperform
$5.53B0.25%
74
Outperform
$5.28B0.98%
70
Neutral
$5.08B0.50%
75
Outperform
$4.83B0.06%
73
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
118.37
17.97
17.90%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
DSI
iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF
AKRE
Akre Focus ETF
QLTY
GMO U.S. Quality ETF
VTHR
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement