CZA - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA)
Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, which can help reduce the impact if any one industry runs into trouble.
Positive Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains so far this year and in recent months, suggesting its strategy has been working well in the current market.
Strong Contributor Among Top Holdings
One of the larger positions has delivered very strong gains, providing a meaningful boost to the fund’s overall results.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fees are on the higher side for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost options.
Heavy Tilt Toward Financials
A large share of the portfolio is in financial stocks, so the fund could be more sensitive to problems in that sector.
Limited International Exposure
Almost all of the ETF’s holdings are in U.S. companies, offering little diversification across different global markets.
CZA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM183.20M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.69%
Beta0.71
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateApr 02, 2007
Dividend Yield1.37%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedZacks Mid Cap Core (TR)
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume6,008
30 Day Avg. Volume2,979
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
145.21Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering101
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
CZA Summary
The Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) is a fund that invests in medium‑sized U.S. companies and aims to track the Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index. It spreads money across many sectors like financials, industrials, and health care. Some well-known holdings include American International Group (AIG) and Prudential Financial. Investors might consider CZA if they want a mix of growth and stability, since mid-sized companies can be less risky than small firms but still have room to grow. A key risk is that the value of the ETF can rise and fall with the overall stock market, especially mid-cap stocks.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) has an expense ratio of 0.69%, which means you’ll pay $6.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, aiming to select mid-cap companies with strong growth and value potential. Active management typically involves more research and trading, which increases costs.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) could benefit from economic growth in the U.S., as mid-cap companies often thrive during periods of expansion due to their balance of stability and growth potential. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact sectors like financials and real estate, which make up a significant portion of the ETF's holdings. Additionally, regulatory changes or shifts in industrial and healthcare policies could influence the performance of top holdings like Agilent and GE Healthcare Technologies.
CZA Top 10 Holdings
CZA leans heavily into U.S. mid-cap financials and health care, and that’s where much of the action is. On the brighter side, Agilent and IQVIA have been rising, helping drive the fund as investors reward their solid growth stories, while Becton Dickinson has been more of a steady workhorse after a softer start to the year. Venture Global has been a real spark plug lately, adding extra juice to returns. Offsetting that strength, AIG and Waste Connections have been lagging, acting as mild brakes on an otherwise forward-moving, domestically focused portfolio.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Becton Dickinson | 2.45% | $4.47M | $51.24B | -2.51% | 67 Neutral | |
| Prudential Financial | 2.04% | $3.72M | $41.53B | 9.77% | 77 Outperform | |
| Agilent | 2.01% | $3.67M | $44.54B | 25.49% | 73 Outperform | |
| American International Group | 1.99% | $3.63M | $40.07B | -5.77% | 60 Neutral | |
| IQVIA Holdings | 1.94% | $3.54M | $43.19B | 37.18% | 73 Outperform | |
| Waste Connections | 1.92% | $3.51M | $41.64B | -10.22% | 75 Outperform | |
| Sysco | 1.88% | $3.43M | $39.50B | 1.83% | 71 Outperform | |
| Hartford Insurance | 1.84% | $3.36M | $37.33B | 4.72% | 78 Outperform | |
| Venture Global, Inc. Class A | 1.77% | $3.22M | $36.20B | 9.08% | 58 Neutral | |
| Public Service Enterprise | 1.74% | $3.18M | $36.55B | -11.10% | 66 Neutral |
CZA Technical Analysis
Neutral
―
Price Trends
124.73
Positive
120.86
Positive
116.61
Positive
Market Momentum
0.50
Positive
48.96
Neutral
24.33
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For CZA, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 126.92, equal to the 50-day MA of 124.73, and equal to the 200-day MA of 116.61, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.50 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 48.96 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 24.33 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for CZA.
CZA Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
CZA
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
125.93
19.10
17.88%
EZM
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Fund
―
―
―
XMLV
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
―
―
―
BKMC
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
―
―
―
GRPM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
―
―
―
AVMC
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents