TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

Comparison Results

Comparison results
NamePricePrice ChangePrice TargetSmart ScoreExpense RatioAsset Under ManagementFollow
IJHiShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF$74.20$93.20(25.60% Upside)0.05%123.12B
VOVanguard Mid-Cap ETF$82.24$99.19(20.60% Upside)0.03%107.40B
IWRiShares Russell Midcap ETF$111.56$134.61(20.66% Upside)0.18%58.18B
MDYState Street SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust$676.84$847.15(25.16% Upside)0.23%25.90B
VOEVanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF$211.01$242.13(14.75% Upside)0.07%24.31B
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF$136.35$184.98(35.67% Upside)0.23%19.17B
VOTVanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF$295.13$380.33(28.87% Upside)0.05%19.12B
SPMDSPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF$65.01$81.26(25.00% Upside)0.03%18.63B
IWSiShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF$171.17$197.84(15.58% Upside)0.23%14.84B
SCHMSchwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF$35.33$44.07(24.74% Upside)0.03%14.76B

Performance Comparison

-10%0%10%20%Nov '25Dec '25Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26Jul '26Aug '26Sep '26Oct '26
Performance comparison by fund
TickerCompany NamePriceChange% Change
IJHiShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF74.2010.1015.75%
VOVanguard Mid-Cap ETF82.2410.5614.73%
IWRiShares Russell Midcap ETF111.5616.9817.95%
MDYState Street SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust676.8490.3115.40%
VOEVanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF211.0142.1524.96%
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF136.35-5.13-3.62%
VOTVanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF295.135.061.75%
SPMDSPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF65.018.8715.80%
IWSiShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF171.1734.8925.60%
SCHMSchwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF35.336.1721.15%

ETFs Similar to CZA FAQ

What is the cheapest alternative to CZA?
Among the ETFs similar to CZA, VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) has the lowest expense ratio, at 0.03% a year, compared with 0.69% for CZA.
CZA vs. IJH: what is the difference?
IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) is the first ETF in CZA's similar-ETF list. It has $123.12B in assets under management and a 0.05% expense ratio, against $179.38M and 0.69% for CZA. Compare their performance, price targets and Smart Scores in the table above.