tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

AQLT - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

AQLT

iShares MSCI Global Quality Factor ETF (AQLT)

Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:
AQLT, the iShares MSCI Global Quality Factor ETF, has a solid overall rating, reflecting its focus on financially strong, high-quality companies. Major holdings like Microsoft and Alphabet (GOOGL/GOOG) boost the fund’s appeal through strong profits, growth in cloud and AI, and generally supportive technical trends, while other leaders such as Apple and Nvidia add further strength despite some valuation and momentum concerns. The main risk is that many top positions are large technology and AI-focused companies with high valuations, so the fund is somewhat concentrated in this growth-oriented segment and could be sensitive to pullbacks in that area.
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered steady gains so far this year and over the past few months, showing positive momentum.
Quality Growth Leaders in Top Holdings
Several major positions in well-known technology and communication companies have shown strong or improving performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
The fund’s management fee is relatively low for an actively targeted factor strategy, allowing investors to keep more of their gains.
Negative Factors
Heavy Tilt Toward U.S. Stocks
With most of its assets in U.S. companies, the ETF is highly sensitive to the U.S. market and offers limited diversification across other regions.
Concentration in Technology and Communication Services
A large share of the portfolio is in technology and communication services, which can increase risk if these sectors experience a downturn.
Several Large Holdings Are Lagging
Some of the biggest positions, including major technology and health care names, have shown weak performance recently, which could weigh on future returns if the trend continues.

AQLT vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AQLT Summary

AQLT is the iShares MSCI Global Quality Factor ETF, which follows the MSCI ACWI Quality index. It invests in stocks from around the world, mainly in the U.S., and focuses on companies with strong finances and steady earnings. Big names in the fund include Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. Someone might invest in AQLT to get broad global stock exposure while tilting toward higher-quality businesses, which can be appealing for long-term growth and diversification. However, the ETF is still a stock fund, so its value can go up and down with the global stock market, especially tech-heavy periods.
How much will it cost me?The iShares MSCI Global Quality Factor ETF (AQLT) has an expense ratio of 0.20%, which means you’ll pay $2 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average for actively managed funds but slightly higher than many passively managed ETFs, as it focuses on a specialized strategy targeting high-quality global stocks.
What would affect this ETF?The iShares MSCI Global Quality Factor ETF (AQLT) could benefit from continued growth in the technology sector, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings, as well as strong performance from its top companies like Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft. However, rising interest rates or global economic slowdowns could negatively impact growth-focused sectors like technology and communication services, which are heavily weighted in this ETF. Regulatory changes affecting major tech companies or geopolitical tensions in key markets could also pose risks to future performance.

AQLT Top 10 Holdings

AQLT is leaning heavily on global tech powerhouses, with Nvidia, Broadcom, and Apple acting as the main engines of performance despite some recent choppiness. ASML has been a standout riser, giving the fund an extra boost from Europe, while Eli Lilly adds a steady dose of health care strength. On the flip side, Microsoft and Meta have been losing a bit of steam lately, tempering overall gains. With a clear tilt toward Big Tech and a mix of U.S. and international names, this ETF’s story is all about high-quality, globally diversified growth.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Apple5.02%$14.40M$4.53T47.93%
79
Outperform
Microsoft4.45%$12.76M$2.90T-22.12%
79
Outperform
Broadcom4.37%$12.53M$1.71T36.42%
76
Outperform
Nvidia4.26%$12.21M$4.71T22.22%
76
Outperform
Meta Platforms4.23%$12.12M$1.48T-14.58%
76
Outperform
Eli Lilly & Co3.00%$8.60M$1.14T58.88%
72
Outperform
ASML Holding NV2.72%$7.78M€624.32B122.09%
76
Outperform
Alphabet Class A2.54%$7.28M$4.34T110.50%
85
Outperform
Visa2.17%$6.22M$682.30B-0.66%
70
Outperform
Alphabet Class C2.01%$5.75M$4.34T105.51%
82
Outperform

AQLT Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
30.98
Positive
100DMA
29.87
Positive
200DMA
28.85
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.14
Negative
RSI
56.49
Neutral
STOCH
47.59
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For AQLT, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 31.15, equal to the 50-day MA of 30.98, and equal to the 200-day MA of 28.85, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.14 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 56.49 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 47.59 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for AQLT.

AQLT Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$287.51M0.20%
68
Neutral
$822.57M0.55%
70
Neutral
$720.14M0.40%
66
Neutral
$658.74M0.75%
63
Neutral
$580.47M0.62%
62
Neutral
$337.28M0.49%
67
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
AQLT
iShares MSCI Global Quality Factor ETF
31.50
6.07
23.87%
RGEF
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF
BFLX
iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF
KAT
Scharf ETF
DWLD
Davis Select Worldwide Etf
RGLO
Global Equity Active ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement