tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

ACSI - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

ACSI

American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI)

Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:
ACSI, the American Customer Satisfaction ETF, has a solid overall rating driven mainly by large positions in high-quality tech leaders like Alphabet (GOOG), Apple (AAPL), and Microsoft (MSFT), which benefit from strong financial performance and long-term growth in areas like AI, cloud, and services. The fund is somewhat held back by holdings such as Dell (DELL), Humana (HUM), and Bank of America (BAC), where concerns around leverage, cash flow, or technical and valuation challenges introduce more risk. The main risk factor is the fund’s meaningful exposure to a handful of big tech and financial names, which can increase volatility if those sectors face pressure.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Fund Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains so far this year and over the past few months, indicating positive recent momentum.
Leading Growth Companies in Top Holdings
Several major technology and internet names in the top holdings, such as Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Dell, have delivered strong or steady results that support the fund’s performance.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across multiple sectors, including consumer, communication services, financials, technology, and others, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Negative Factors
High U.S. Market Concentration
With almost all assets invested in U.S. companies, the ETF offers little geographic diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. market’s fortunes.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some large positions, including Microsoft, Apple, Bank of America, JPMorgan, and Prudential, have shown weak or negative performance this year, which can drag on overall returns.
Above-Average Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, meaning more of the investment’s return is used to cover fees.

ACSI vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

ACSI Summary

ACSI is the American Customer Satisfaction ETF, which follows the American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index. It invests in large U.S. companies that score highly on customer satisfaction, across many sectors like technology, consumer, and financials. Well-known holdings include Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet (Google). Someone might invest in ACSI to seek long-term growth from strong, established brands while staying diversified across different industries. A key risk is that the ETF still holds stocks, so its value can go up and down with the overall stock market and with changes in big tech and consumer companies.
How much will it cost me?The American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) has an expense ratio of 0.65%, which means you’ll pay $6.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, focusing on companies with strong customer satisfaction data rather than tracking a broad market index.
What would affect this ETF?The American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) could benefit from strong consumer spending and technological advancements, as its holdings include major companies in consumer-focused and tech sectors like Apple, Amazon, and Microsoft. However, economic downturns, rising interest rates, or regulatory changes affecting large-cap companies in the U.S. could negatively impact its performance, especially in sectors like Consumer Cyclical and Communication Services. The ETF’s focus on customer satisfaction may provide stability during volatile periods but could face challenges if consumer preferences shift or competition intensifies.

ACSI Top 10 Holdings

ACSI leans heavily on U.S. large caps, with a clear tilt toward Big Tech and major banks, so a handful of names do most of the heavy lifting. Dell has been the standout, riding strong momentum in AI-related demand and giving the fund a solid boost. On the flip side, Microsoft and Meta have been losing a bit of altitude lately, tempering overall returns, while Alphabet and Amazon are more in the “steady but not spectacular” camp. Financials like TD Bank and Bank of America are quietly supporting the fund, adding a more traditional backbone to this customer-satisfaction-driven portfolio.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Dell Technologies8.75%$10.00M$255.63B231.06%
65
Neutral
Alphabet Class C6.69%$7.65M$4.34T105.51%
82
Outperform
Humana4.81%$5.50M$47.63B66.16%
69
Neutral
Apple4.58%$5.24M$4.53T47.93%
79
Outperform
Amazon4.38%$5.01M$2.61T12.14%
71
Outperform
Microsoft4.02%$4.60M$2.90T-22.12%
79
Outperform
Meta Platforms3.91%$4.47M$1.48T-14.58%
76
Outperform
Toronto Dominion Bank3.71%$4.24M$202.13B62.76%
74
Outperform
Bank of America3.50%$4.00M$416.78B26.96%
72
Outperform
Prudential Financial3.44%$3.93M$39.19B7.36%
77
Outperform

ACSI Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
72.40
Positive
100DMA
69.41
Positive
200DMA
67.85
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.77
Negative
RSI
67.76
Neutral
STOCH
98.57
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For ACSI, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 73.98, equal to the 50-day MA of 72.40, and equal to the 200-day MA of 67.85, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.77 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 67.76 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 98.57 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for ACSI.

ACSI Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$114.38M0.65%
72
Outperform
$987.60M0.25%
71
Outperform
$983.04M0.25%
74
Outperform
$978.09M0.18%
72
Outperform
$926.99M0.75%
71
Outperform
$923.20M0.95%
69
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
ACSI
American Customer Satisfaction ETF
75.34
12.58
20.04%
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF
QLC
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund
DSPY
Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy
FTQI
First Trust Hedged BuyWrite Income ETF
OMAH
VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement