MLPX - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX)
MLPX, the Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF, has an overall rating that reflects a generally solid lineup of energy infrastructure companies with good income potential and growth prospects. Strong contributors like Oneok and MPLX, which show robust financial performance, bullish technical trends, and attractive dividend yields, help support the fund’s quality. However, several holdings such as Enbridge, Kinder Morgan, and Pembina Pipeline face high leverage, revenue or cash flow pressures, and some bearish or cautious technical signals, and the fund’s focus on midstream energy infrastructure means investors are exposed to sector-specific risks.
MLPX vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 3.79B
- Region
- North America
- Expense Ratio
- 0.45%
- Beta
- 0.21
- Issuer
- Global X
- Inception Date
- Aug 06, 2013
- Dividend Yield
- 4.01%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- Stuttgart Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure
MLPX Summary
MLPX is the Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF, which follows the Stuttgart Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure index. It focuses on companies that own and operate energy pipelines and storage facilities across North America. Well-known holdings include Kinder Morgan and Enbridge, major players in moving oil and natural gas. Investors might consider MLPX for income and diversification, since these businesses often earn steady fees from transporting energy. However, this ETF is heavily tied to the energy sector, so its value can go up or down with changes in energy prices, regulations, and overall market conditions.
How much will it cost me?
MLPX has an annual expense ratio of 0.45%, which means you’ll pay about $4.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is somewhat higher than a typical broad, passively managed index ETF because MLPX is a more specialized, sector-focused fund that requires more active oversight and niche expertise.
What would affect this ETF?
This ETF is heavily focused on North American energy infrastructure companies and MLPs, so it could benefit if energy demand stays strong, more pipelines and export facilities are built, and regulations remain supportive of oil and gas transportation. On the other hand, it could be hurt by stricter environmental rules, weaker economic growth that reduces energy use, or lower energy prices that pressure the profits and payouts of major holdings like TC Energy, Enbridge, and Kinder Morgan.
MLPX Top 10 Holdings
MLPX is essentially a bet on North American energy pipelines, with a heavy tilt toward big midstream names. Targa Resources and Cheniere Energy have been rising sharply, acting as the fund’s main engines, while Kinder Morgan, Oneok, and Williams are steadily adding fuel with solid, if less dramatic, gains. On the flip side, Enbridge and TC Energy have seen more mixed, lagging action lately, occasionally throwing sand in the gears. Overall, the ETF is tightly focused on energy infrastructure, mostly U.S.-centric with some Canadian exposure, making it a concentrated play on the continent’s energy backbone.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Williams Co | 9.06% | $341.77M | $90.94B | 29.04% | 76Outperform | |
| TC Energy | 9.14% | $344.79M | CAD 93.94B | 27.67% | 70Outperform | |
| Enbridge | ― | ― | ― | ― | 69Neutral | |
| Targa Resources | 8.29% | $312.43M | $67.54B | 107.89% | 74Outperform | |
| Kinder Morgan | 7.30% | $275.32M | $75.45B | 29.87% | 68Neutral | |
| Oneok | 6.38% | $240.72M | $61.20B | 45.49% | 82Outperform | |
| Cheniere Energy | 5.15% | $194.16M | $67.45B | 56.16% | 71Outperform | |
| Pembina Pipeline | ― | ― | ― | ― | 70Outperform | |
| MPLX | 4.51% | $169.89M | $60.99B | 18.96% | 81Outperform | |
| Enterprise Products Partners | 4.53% | $170.80M | $82.38B | 20.80% | 73Outperform |
MLPX Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MLPX, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of 76.53 is above the 20-day moving average (MA) of 73.40, above the 50-day MA of 73.66, and above the 200-day MA of 71.88, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.78 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 64.82 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 91.23 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for MLPX.
MLPX Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $76.53 | $79.00(3.23% Upside) | $3.79B | 0.45% | 71Outperform | |
| $203.76 | $227.34(11.57% Upside) | $4.53B | 0.35% | 68Neutral | |
| $55.88 | $60.56(8.37% Upside) | $2.44B | 0.77% | 72Outperform | |
| $38.48 | $40.43(5.07% Upside) | $2.33B | 0.08% | 72Outperform | |
| $73.81 | $77.25(4.67% Upside) | $1.82B | 0.37% | 73Outperform | |
| $43.47 | $46.60(7.18% Upside) | $1.21B | 0.60% | 72Outperform |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLPX | Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 76.53 | 20.62 | 36.87% | |
| XOP | SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 203.76 | 78.65 | 62.86% | |
| MLPA | Global X MLP ETF | 55.88 | 11.35 | 25.49% | |
| FENY | Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 38.48 | 14.62 | 61.27% | |
| IYE | iShares U.S. Energy ETF | 73.81 | 28.02 | 61.18% | |
| FTXN | First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF | 43.47 | 16.56 | 61.51% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.