FENY - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY)
FENY, the Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF, earns a solid overall rating driven largely by heavyweight holdings like Exxon Mobil and Chevron, which bring strong financial performance, robust cash generation, and supportive earnings call commentary to the portfolio. Other key positions such as ConocoPhillips and EOG Resources add to the fund’s quality with healthy balance sheets, attractive valuations, and positive strategic updates, though some holdings like Kinder Morgan and Marathon Petroleum face technical and leverage challenges that slightly weigh on the rating. The main risk factor is the ETF’s heavy concentration in the energy sector, which can make performance more sensitive to commodity prices and industry-specific downturns.
FENY vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 2.33B
- Region
- North America
- Expense Ratio
- 0.08%
- Beta
- 0.23
- Issuer
- Fidelity
- Inception Date
- Oct 21, 2013
- Dividend Yield
- 2.05%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index
FENY Summary
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) is an exchange-traded fund that follows the MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index, focusing mainly on U.S. energy companies. It holds big names like Exxon Mobil and Chevron, along with other firms involved in finding, producing, and transporting oil and gas. Someone might invest in FENY to get simple, one-stop exposure to the energy sector and potentially benefit if energy prices and demand rise over time. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in energy stocks, so its value can swing sharply with oil and gas markets and broader economic conditions.
How much will it cost me?
FENY has an expense ratio of 0.084%, which means you’ll pay about $0.84 per year for every $1,000 invested. That’s lower than the average ETF because it’s a passively managed fund that simply tracks an energy sector index instead of paying managers to pick individual stocks.
What would affect this ETF?
Because FENY is heavily invested in U.S. energy companies like Exxon Mobil and Chevron, it could benefit if oil and gas demand stays strong, energy prices rise, or new technologies make production more efficient. On the other hand, it could be hurt by falling energy prices, slower economic growth, tighter environmental rules, or a shift toward renewable energy that reduces long-term demand for traditional oil and gas.
FENY Top 10 Holdings
FENY is an all‑U.S. energy play, and its story starts with Exxon Mobil and Chevron, which together act as the fund’s twin engines, both rising on solid earnings and cash generation. ConocoPhillips and EOG Resources add more upstream punch, also trending higher as production and cash flow stay strong. On the refining side, Marathon Petroleum, Valero, and Phillips 66 have been standout winners, giving the ETF extra lift, while Williams and Schlumberger are more steady contributors. Overall, this is a highly concentrated bet on traditional oil and gas strength, not a diversified market basket.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exxon Mobil | 23.19% | $539.49M | $769.96B | 63.27% | 74Outperform | |
| Chevron | 14.74% | $343.01M | $465.33B | 53.41% | 71Outperform | |
| Conocophillips | 6.35% | $147.73M | $185.04B | 74.76% | 78Outperform | |
| Marathon Petroleum | 4.40% | $102.47M | $124.89B | 127.33% | 66Neutral | |
| Valero Energy | 3.98% | $92.70M | $111.46B | 134.96% | 69Neutral | |
| Phillips 66 | 3.80% | $88.32M | $110.32B | 106.34% | 73Outperform | |
| Williams Co | 3.13% | $72.92M | $90.94B | 29.04% | 76Outperform | |
| EOG Resources | 3.03% | $70.39M | $86.83B | 56.97% | 78Outperform | |
| SLB | 2.76% | $64.22M | $79.32B | 47.96% | 75Outperform | |
| Targa Resources | 2.30% | $53.50M | $67.54B | 107.89% | 74Outperform |
FENY Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FENY, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of 38.48 is above the 20-day moving average (MA) of 36.88, above the 50-day MA of 35.74, and above the 200-day MA of 32.27, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.78 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 67.68 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 78.77 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FENY.
FENY Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $38.48 | $42.00(9.15% Upside) | $2.33B | 0.08% | 72Outperform | |
| $203.76 | $238.02(16.81% Upside) | $4.53B | 0.35% | 68Neutral | |
| $76.53 | $87.03(13.71% Upside) | $3.79B | 0.45% | 71Outperform | |
| $55.88 | $61.97(10.89% Upside) | $2.44B | 0.77% | 72Outperform | |
| $73.81 | $80.50(9.06% Upside) | $1.82B | 0.37% | 73Outperform | |
| $43.47 | $49.00(12.70% Upside) | $1.21B | 0.60% | 72Outperform |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FENY | Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 38.48 | 14.90 | 63.20% | |
| XOP | SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 203.76 | 80.34 | 65.10% | |
| MLPX | Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 76.53 | 21.29 | 38.53% | |
| MLPA | Global X MLP ETF | 55.88 | 11.62 | 26.25% | |
| IYE | iShares U.S. Energy ETF | 73.81 | 28.50 | 62.89% | |
| FTXN | First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF | 43.47 | 16.92 | 63.74% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.