tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

ZAP - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

ZAP

Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP)

Rating:70Neutral
Price Target:
$34.00
The Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) has a solid overall rating, reflecting a mix of strong holdings and some challenges. Eaton stands out as a key contributor to the fund's rating due to its robust financial performance and strategic growth initiatives, which support a positive outlook despite valuation concerns. On the other hand, holdings like Xcel Energy and Entergy face financial risks such as high leverage and cash flow challenges, which may slightly weigh on the ETF’s overall score. Investors should also note potential risks from sector concentration in energy and infrastructure-focused companies.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Constellation Energy and Vistra Energy, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the fund’s overall returns.
Sector Focus on Utilities
The ETF’s heavy exposure to utilities provides stability, as this sector tends to perform well during economic uncertainty.
Consistent Asset Growth
The fund has a healthy level of assets under management, indicating steady investor interest and confidence.
Negative Factors
High Geographic Concentration
The ETF is almost entirely focused on U.S. companies, limiting diversification across global markets.
Sector Over-Concentration
With over 76% of the portfolio in utilities, the fund is highly dependent on the performance of this single sector.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The ETF’s expense ratio is higher than many low-cost alternatives, which could reduce net returns over time.

ZAP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

ZAP Summary

The Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (Ticker: ZAP) is an investment fund focused on companies driving the shift toward electrification in the U.S. economy. It includes businesses involved in renewable energy, electric vehicles, and energy storage. Well-known companies like NextEra Energy and Eaton are part of its portfolio. Investors might consider ZAP for its potential growth as electrification becomes a key trend in energy and infrastructure. However, since it focuses heavily on utilities and industrials, its performance can be impacted by changes in energy policies or market conditions.
How much will it cost me?The Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (Ticker: ZAP) has an expense ratio of 0.50%, which means you’ll pay $5 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is a sector-focused fund, which typically requires more active management compared to broad-market index funds. However, this cost reflects the specialized exposure to the growing electrification sector.
What would affect this ETF?The Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) could benefit from increased government support for renewable energy and electrification initiatives, as well as growing consumer demand for electric vehicles and energy-efficient technologies. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for infrastructure projects, and potential regulatory hurdles or delays in transitioning away from fossil fuels. Its heavy exposure to the utilities sector makes it sensitive to changes in energy policies and market dynamics.

ZAP Top 10 Holdings

The Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) is heavily concentrated in utilities, which make up over three-quarters of its portfolio, with industrials playing a supporting role. Constellation Energy and NextEra Energy are shining bright, benefiting from strong financial performance and strategic clean energy initiatives, while Vistra Energy is lagging slightly due to bearish trends and market challenges. Quanta Services adds steady momentum with growth from acquisitions, but Eaton’s mixed results and valuation concerns temper its impact. Overall, ZAP’s focus on U.S.-based electrification positions it well for long-term growth in renewable energy and infrastructure.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Ametek4.30%$11.12M$45.59B4.39%
78
Outperform
Quanta Services4.21%$10.88M$67.62B38.04%
76
Outperform
Eaton4.16%$10.76M$149.70B6.90%
78
Outperform
American Electric Power4.11%$10.62M$64.10B24.08%
72
Outperform
Entergy4.05%$10.47M$43.00B31.13%
70
Neutral
Xcel Energy4.03%$10.42M$48.03B21.66%
70
Neutral
Dominion Energy3.97%$10.26M$50.97B6.83%
63
Neutral
National Grid Transco3.95%$10.20M$75.00B18.65%
74
Outperform
NextEra Energy3.92%$10.12M$171.07B9.89%
73
Outperform
Exelon3.89%$10.06M$46.62B21.16%
72
Outperform

ZAP Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
29.46
Positive
100DMA
28.43
Positive
200DMA
26.57
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.26
Positive
RSI
51.82
Neutral
STOCH
26.96
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For ZAP, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 30.60, equal to the 50-day MA of 29.46, and equal to the 200-day MA of 26.57, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.26 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 51.82 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 26.96 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for ZAP.

ZAP Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$256.98M0.50%
70
Neutral
$832.52M0.75%
69
Neutral
$791.35M0.60%
72
Outperform
$672.98M0.30%
70
Neutral
$582.61M0.65%
71
Outperform
$575.95M0.56%
66
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
ZAP
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF
30.36
6.59
27.72%
PWRD
Tcw Transform Systems Etf
PNQI
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF
SIXG
Defiance Connective Technologies Etf
FEPI
REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF
QCLN
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement