TipRanks
Advertisement

SQS - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

SQS

Sapient Quality Select ETF (SQS)

Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:
SQS (Sapient Quality Select ETF) earns a solid overall rating largely because it is built around high-quality tech leaders like Alphabet, Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia, all supported by strong financial performance, growth in AI and cloud, and generally positive long-term outlooks. The rating is held back somewhat by holdings such as Vistra Energy and Eli Lilly, where high leverage, cash flow challenges, and profitability concerns introduce more risk. The main risk factor for the ETF is its heavy concentration in large technology and AI-focused companies, which can make the fund more sensitive to shifts in tech valuations and market sentiment.
Positive Factors
Strong Mega-Cap Tech Leaders
Several of the largest positions, including major technology names like Nvidia, Apple, Alphabet, and Microsoft, have shown strong or steady gains, helping drive the fund’s overall performance.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings spread across technology, financials, consumer sectors, health care, and more help reduce the impact if any single industry runs into trouble.
Solid Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered a positive return so far this year, indicating that its quality-focused strategy has been working in the current market.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively high for an ETF, which means more of your returns are eaten up by fees over time.
Heavy Concentration in a Few Tech Stocks
A large share of the portfolio is tied up in a small group of big technology companies, increasing the risk if those specific stocks stumble.
Limited Geographic Diversification
With almost all assets invested in U.S. companies, the fund offers little exposure to international markets and may be more sensitive to U.S.-specific economic or policy shocks.

SQS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

SQS Summary

Sapient Quality Select ETF (SQS) is an actively managed fund that focuses on “quality growth” companies, mainly in the U.S., rather than tracking a fixed index. It looks for profitable, financially strong businesses with good growth prospects across sectors like technology, healthcare, and consumer companies. Well-known holdings include Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon. Someone might invest in SQS to seek long-term growth while staying diversified across many leading companies. A key risk is that it leans heavily toward tech and growth stocks, so its price can rise and fall more sharply than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.80%, which means you’ll pay about $8 per year for every $1,000 you invest. That’s higher than the average ETF because it’s actively managed, with professionals selecting and monitoring a focused portfolio of quality growth companies around the world.
What would affect this ETF?This ETF is heavily invested in global technology and other growth-focused companies like Nvidia, Alphabet, and Apple, so it could benefit from ongoing innovation, rising demand for artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and healthcare breakthroughs, as well as a stable or falling interest-rate environment that tends to support growth stocks. On the other hand, it could be hurt by higher interest rates, stricter tech regulations, economic slowdowns that reduce consumer and business spending, or a broad market shift away from growth and quality themes toward more defensive or value-oriented areas.

SQS Top 10 Holdings

This ETF is leaning heavily on Big Tech and semiconductors, with Nvidia, Microsoft, and Micron acting as the main engines of recent gains as AI and cloud themes stay in the spotlight. Micron and Palo Alto Networks have been rising sharply, giving the fund extra lift, while Microsoft’s rebound adds steady power. On the flip side, Alphabet and Apple have been more mixed, occasionally losing steam and softening overall momentum, and Vistra has been a noticeable drag. The portfolio is globally focused but dominated by U.S. tech-driven growth stories.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Nvidia9.52%$130.98M$5.15T24.46%
76
Outperform
Apple7.71%$106.08M$4.85T41.67%
79
Outperform
Alphabet Class A7.66%$105.46M$4.17T37.81%
85
Outperform
Microsoft5.58%$76.77M$3.64T-2.10%
79
Outperform
Amazon5.36%$73.70M$2.65T6.19%
71
Outperform
Eli Lilly & Co4.80%$66.05M$1.07T51.05%
72
Outperform
Vistra Corp4.06%$55.82M$47.12B-32.60%
65
Neutral
Micron3.96%$54.53M$1.05T478.78%
79
Outperform
Broadcom3.76%$51.76M$1.62T0.56%
76
Outperform
JPMorgan Chase3.39%$46.66M$927.49B11.52%
72
Outperform

SQS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
28.10
Negative
100DMA
27.90
Positive
200DMA
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.10
Positive
RSI
47.29
Neutral
STOCH
20.59
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SQS, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 28.08, equal to the 50-day MA of 28.10, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.10 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 47.29 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 20.59 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for SQS.

SQS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$1.37B0.80%
73
Outperform
$7.31B0.75%
52
Neutral
$3.14B0.65%
63
Neutral
$1.92B0.75%
52
Neutral
$1.87B0.75%
62
Neutral
$1.75B0.75%
59
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
SQS
Sapient Quality Select ETF
27.94
2.59
10.22%
ARKK
Ark Innovation Etf
FWD
AB Disruptors ETF
ARKG
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement