tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

RWLC - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RWLC

Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF (RWLC)

Rating:74Outperform
Price Target:
RWLC’s rating reflects a solid overall profile, led by major positions in high-quality, growth-focused companies like Apple, Microsoft, and Alphabet, which benefit from strong financial performance and leadership in areas such as AI, cloud, and consumer technology. Nvidia, Micron, and Lam Research further support the fund’s quality through their roles in AI and advanced chips, though some holdings like Amazon, Eli Lilly, and Mastercard face issues such as premium valuations, leverage, or weaker technical trends that slightly weigh on the fund. The main risk is the fund’s heavy tilt toward large technology and AI-related names, which can increase sensitivity to shifts in tech sector sentiment and valuations.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year and over the past three months, showing solid recent momentum.
Leading Technology Exposure
A large allocation to major technology names like Apple, Nvidia, and Alphabet has supported performance as these stocks have generally performed well.
Broad Sector Mix
Holdings spread across technology, financials, health care, communication services, consumer sectors, and energy help reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With almost all assets in U.S. companies, the fund offers little geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market.
Tech Sector Dependence
A very large weight in technology stocks means the ETF could be hit hard if the tech sector experiences a downturn.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
While several top positions have been strong, some large holdings like Microsoft and Mastercard have recently lagged, which can drag on overall returns.

RWLC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RWLC Summary

RWLC, the Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF, focuses mainly on large U.S. companies and follows a data-driven strategy rather than a traditional index. It invests across many sectors, with a big tilt toward technology, and holds well-known names like Apple, Nvidia, Microsoft, and Amazon. Someone might consider this ETF to get broad exposure to many leading U.S. companies in one investment, which can help with diversification and long-term growth potential. A key risk is that it is heavily weighted toward tech stocks, so its price can rise or fall sharply when the tech sector or overall stock market moves.
How much will it cost me?The Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF (RAYD) has an expense ratio of 0.8%, meaning you’ll pay $8 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it’s actively managed, using advanced data analytics and systematic strategies to optimize returns.
What would affect this ETF?The Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF (RAYD) could benefit from continued growth in the technology sector, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings, as well as strong performance from top companies like Nvidia and Microsoft. However, potential risks include economic slowdowns in developed markets or rising interest rates, which could negatively impact financial and consumer-focused sectors. Regulatory changes affecting major tech companies or broader market volatility could also pose challenges for this ETF.

RWLC Top 10 Holdings

RWLC is leaning heavily into U.S. Big Tech and chipmakers, with Apple and Nvidia doing much of the heavy lifting. Apple has been rising steadily, giving the fund a solid anchor, while Nvidia’s performance has been more mixed but still a key engine thanks to its AI story. Micron and Lam Research, both tied to the semiconductor boom, have been strong but choppy drivers. On the other side, Microsoft and Amazon have recently lost some steam, acting as mild brakes. Overall, the ETF is a tech-centric, U.S.-focused play with performance dominated by a handful of heavyweight names.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Apple8.54%$8.51M$4.54T36.62%
79
Outperform
Nvidia6.61%$6.59M$4.86T22.58%
76
Outperform
Alphabet Class A3.84%$3.82M$4.36T75.90%
85
Outperform
Alphabet Class C3.42%$3.40M$4.36T74.91%
82
Outperform
Microsoft2.87%$2.86M$3.45T-4.22%
79
Outperform
Micron2.74%$2.73M$929.52B638.14%
79
Outperform
Mastercard2.61%$2.60M$506.64B-1.98%
75
Outperform
Amazon2.46%$2.45M$2.92T23.26%
71
Outperform
Lam Research2.16%$2.15M$366.44B206.00%
77
Outperform
Eli Lilly & Co2.04%$2.03M$1.08T89.52%
72
Outperform

RWLC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
37.39
Positive
100DMA
35.89
Positive
200DMA
34.51
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.36
Negative
RSI
65.10
Neutral
STOCH
79.19
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RWLC, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 37.79, equal to the 50-day MA of 37.39, and equal to the 200-day MA of 34.51, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.36 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 65.10 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 79.19 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RWLC.

RWLC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$70.65M0.32%
74
Outperform
$90.03M1.00%
72
Outperform
$84.70M0.70%
72
Outperform
$84.36M0.80%
67
Neutral
$81.60M0.93%
63
Neutral
$69.54M0.56%
72
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RWLC
Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF
38.62
6.58
20.54%
PRMR
PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF
HUSV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF
FCUS
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
EGGQ
NestYield Visionary ETF
LCF
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement