RSPR - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR)
Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year and over the past few months, showing positive momentum in its real estate holdings.
Equal-Weight Real Estate Exposure
By weighting its S&P 500 real estate stocks more evenly, the fund avoids relying too heavily on just one or two large companies.
Multiple Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Welltower, Ventas, and Healthpeak Properties, have posted strong year-to-date gains that support the fund’s overall performance.
Negative Factors
Single-Sector Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s assets are in the real estate sector, so investors are heavily exposed to swings in property markets.
U.S.-Only Geographic Focus
With nearly all holdings in U.S. companies, the fund offers little diversification across different countries or regions.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
A few major positions, such as CBRE Group and BXP, have shown weak or negative year-to-date performance, which can drag on overall returns.
RSPR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM86.19M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.40%
Beta0.52
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateAug 13, 2015
Dividend Yield2.96%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume20,412
30 Day Avg. Volume12,113
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
41.24Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering31
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RSPR Summary
RSPR is the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF, which follows a real estate version of the S&P 500 index. It invests mainly in U.S. real estate companies that own or manage properties like shopping centers, apartments, offices, and warehouses. Well-known holdings include Simon Property Group and Realty Income. Because each company is given similar weight, the fund avoids putting too much money into any single stock, helping with diversification. Investors might consider RSPR for long-term growth and income from the real estate sector. A key risk is that real estate stocks can go up and down with interest rates and the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) has an expense ratio of 0.4%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because it uses an equal weight methodology and focuses on a specific sector, which requires more active management compared to broad market index ETFs.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) could benefit from positive trends such as urbanization, demographic shifts, and increased demand for commercial and residential properties, which drive growth in the real estate sector. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact property values and rental income, affecting the ETF's performance. Its focus on U.S. real estate and equal weight methodology provides diversification but also exposes it to risks tied to domestic economic conditions and regulatory changes.
RSPR Top 10 Holdings
RSPR is a pure U.S. real estate play, and its story right now is all about specialized property themes. Data-center giants like Equinix and Digital Realty are doing the heavy lifting, with rising momentum that’s helping power the fund. Healthcare-focused landlords such as Welltower, Ventas, and Healthpeak are more of a mixed bag—long-term demand looks solid, but recent trading has been choppy and occasionally lagging. With its equal-weight approach, no single name dominates, yet the tilt toward healthcare and digital infrastructure clearly sets the tone for performance.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Welltower | 3.91% | $3.36M | $169.01B | 39.47% | 77 Outperform | |
| Alexandria Equities | 3.84% | $3.30M | $9.33B | -35.57% | 47 Neutral | |
| Ventas | 3.71% | $3.18M | $46.25B | 29.04% | 68 Neutral | |
| CBRE Group | 3.71% | $3.18M | $40.12B | -15.94% | 70 Outperform | |
| Digital Realty | 3.63% | $3.12M | $67.18B | 7.53% | 69 Neutral | |
| Healthpeak Properties | 3.57% | $3.07M | $14.38B | 10.39% | 58 Neutral | |
| Equinix | 3.52% | $3.02M | $100.27B | 30.64% | 73 Outperform | |
| BXP | 3.48% | $2.99M | $11.18B | -17.77% | 62 Neutral | |
| Simon Property | 3.43% | $2.94M | $65.66B | 13.54% | 70 Outperform | |
| Essex Property | 3.39% | $2.91M | $18.03B | 0.81% | 69 Neutral |
RSPR Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
36.45
Negative
36.28
Negative
35.03
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.51
Positive
30.88
Neutral
9.24
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPR, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 35.74, equal to the 50-day MA of 36.45, and equal to the 200-day MA of 35.03, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.51 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 30.88 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 9.24 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RSPR.
RSPR Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
34.52
0.12
0.35%
PSR
Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund
―
―
―
REIT
ALPS Active REIT ETF
―
―
―
NETL
NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF
―
―
―
BYRE
Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF
―
―
―
PPTY
US Diversified Real Estate ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents