tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

RSPR - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RSPR

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR)

Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:
RSPR, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF, has a solid overall rating that reflects generally strong but not flawless quality among its real estate holdings. Strong contributors like Host Hotels & Resorts and Federal Realty support the fund with solid financial performance, growth initiatives, and attractive dividends, while names such as Iron Mountain and Healthpeak Properties introduce some drag due to high leverage, profitability challenges, and weaker technical trends. The main risk factor is the fund’s concentration in real estate, where issues like high debt levels, potential overvaluation, and regional or sector-specific pressures can affect many holdings at the same time.
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered positive returns over the past month, three months, and year to date, showing recent strength in its strategy.
Strong Real Estate Leaders in Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as data center and communications-focused real estate companies, have shown strong gains, helping support the fund’s overall results.
Equal-Weight Approach
The fund spreads its holdings more evenly across many real estate stocks, reducing reliance on just a few giants in the sector.
Negative Factors
Single-Sector Concentration
Almost all assets are in the real estate sector, so the ETF is highly sensitive to downturns in property and interest-rate-related markets.
U.S.-Only Exposure
All of the fund’s holdings are in U.S. companies, offering no geographic diversification if the U.S. market weakens.
Moderately High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fees are higher than many broad market ETFs, which can slightly reduce long-term returns for investors.

RSPR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RSPR Summary

RSPR is the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF. It tracks a version of the S&P 500 index that focuses only on real estate companies and gives each stock a similar weight, instead of letting the biggest ones dominate. The fund holds well-known names like CBRE Group and Equinix, covering many types of properties, from offices and hotels to data centers and rental homes. Someone might invest for diversification and potential income from the real estate sector. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to U.S. real estate, which can rise and fall with interest rates and the property market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) has an expense ratio of 0.4%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because it uses an equal weight methodology and focuses on a specific sector, which requires more active management compared to broad market index ETFs.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) could benefit from positive trends such as urbanization, demographic shifts, and increased demand for commercial and residential properties, which drive growth in the real estate sector. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact property values and rental income, affecting the ETF's performance. Its focus on U.S. real estate and equal weight methodology provides diversification but also exposes it to risks tied to domestic economic conditions and regulatory changes.

RSPR Top 10 Holdings

RSPR is a pure U.S. real estate play, and its story is being written by a mix of rising landlords and a few stumbling players. Iron Mountain and Equinix have been key engines, riding strong growth and data-center demand, while Healthpeak and Host Hotels add steady momentum from healthcare and hospitality properties. On the softer side, BXP has been losing steam and CBRE has been dragging the fund with weaker recent trading. With an equal-weight approach, no single REIT dominates, but the fund is clearly tethered to the fortunes of U.S. commercial and residential property markets.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
BXP3.81%$3.88M$11.60B-8.07%
62
Neutral
Host Hotels & Resorts3.80%$3.87M$16.67B63.53%
77
Outperform
Healthpeak Properties3.60%$3.67M$14.48B19.04%
58
Neutral
Invitation Homes3.50%$3.57M$17.49B-11.51%
69
Neutral
Federal Realty3.49%$3.56M$10.84B32.06%
77
Outperform
Iron Mountain3.49%$3.55M$37.24B25.25%
55
Neutral
Simon Property3.39%$3.46M$69.68B39.60%
70
Outperform
Camden Property3.37%$3.43M$15.47B-0.98%
73
Outperform
Essex Property3.36%$3.43M$18.64B-0.25%
69
Neutral
Kimco Realty3.33%$3.39M$17.37B24.39%
69
Neutral

RSPR Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
35.78
Positive
100DMA
35.01
Positive
200DMA
34.43
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.42
Negative
RSI
58.76
Neutral
STOCH
77.93
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPR, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 36.42, equal to the 50-day MA of 35.78, and equal to the 200-day MA of 34.43, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.42 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 58.76 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 77.93 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RSPR.

RSPR Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$106.11M0.40%
68
Neutral
$864.41M0.48%
70
Outperform
$482.86M0.50%
68
Neutral
$303.63M0.35%
60
Neutral
$280.89M0.68%
69
Neutral
$104.28M0.50%
55
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
37.01
2.74
8.00%
REZ
iShares Residential and Multisector Real Estate ETF
JPRE
JPMorgan Realty Income ETF
KBWY
Invesco KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ETF
IYRI
NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF
RIET
Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement