tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

RSPR - AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RSPR

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR)

Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:
$38.00
The overall rating of the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) reflects a balanced mix of strong performers and weaker holdings. Prologis and Welltower stand out as key contributors, with their robust financial performance, strategic growth initiatives, and positive earnings call sentiment driving the fund's strength. However, Crown Castle's weak financial performance and operational challenges have likely held back the ETF's rating. A notable risk factor is the potential overvaluation across several holdings, which could impact future returns.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several holdings, such as Prologis and Welltower, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF’s returns.
Equal Weight Strategy
The fund’s equal-weight approach reduces reliance on any single company, promoting balanced exposure within the real estate sector.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
The ETF’s expense ratio is relatively low for a specialized sector fund, making it cost-effective for investors.
Negative Factors
Sector Concentration Risk
The ETF is entirely focused on the real estate sector, making it vulnerable to downturns in this industry.
Weak Performance in Recent Months
The fund has experienced negative returns over the past three months, indicating short-term challenges.
Limited Geographic Diversification
The ETF is fully invested in U.S. companies, offering no exposure to international markets.

RSPR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RSPR Summary

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) is an investment fund that focuses on the real estate sector within the S&P 500 index. It includes companies like Prologis and Iron Mountain, which are involved in areas such as commercial and industrial properties. This ETF uses an equal weight approach, meaning no single company dominates the portfolio, providing balanced exposure to the real estate market. Investors might consider RSPR for diversification and potential long-term growth tied to trends like urbanization and demographic changes. However, it’s important to know that the ETF’s performance is heavily tied to the real estate sector, which can be sensitive to economic conditions.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) has an expense ratio of 0.4%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because it uses an equal weight methodology and focuses on a specific sector, which requires more active management compared to broad market index ETFs.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) could benefit from positive trends such as urbanization, demographic shifts, and increased demand for commercial and residential properties, which drive growth in the real estate sector. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact property values and rental income, affecting the ETF's performance. Its focus on U.S. real estate and equal weight methodology provides diversification but also exposes it to risks tied to domestic economic conditions and regulatory changes.

RSPR Top 10 Holdings

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) is firmly rooted in the U.S. real estate sector, with a balanced mix of commercial, residential, and industrial property-focused companies. Prologis and Ventas are rising stars, benefiting from strong growth trends and strategic expansions, giving the fund a boost. Meanwhile, Equinix and SBA Communications are holding back performance, with valuation concerns and mixed technical signals weighing on their outlook. The fund’s equal-weight approach ensures no single company dominates, offering a steady yet sector-concentrated play on real estate’s long-term growth potential.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Prologis3.79%$4.30M$118.00B9.43%
79
Outperform
Equinix3.68%$4.17M$83.07B-4.76%
79
Outperform
Welltower3.65%$4.14M$124.25B35.84%
77
Outperform
Ventas3.62%$4.10M$35.51B14.96%
68
Neutral
Iron Mountain3.59%$4.06M$30.41B-15.03%
62
Neutral
Healthpeak Properties3.39%$3.84M$12.74B-18.33%
63
Neutral
SBA Communications3.36%$3.80M$20.56B-15.12%
62
Neutral
Simon Property3.33%$3.77M$57.38B4.81%
74
Outperform
Digital Realty3.33%$3.77M$58.12B-3.18%
70
Outperform
Realty Income3.31%$3.75M$53.01B-1.53%
72
Outperform

RSPR Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
35.05
Negative
100DMA
34.98
Negative
200DMA
34.79
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.30
Positive
RSI
32.81
Neutral
STOCH
15.16
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPR, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 34.68, equal to the 50-day MA of 35.05, and equal to the 200-day MA of 34.79, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.30 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 32.81 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 15.16 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RSPR.

RSPR Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$113.18M0.40%
70
Outperform
$937.87M0.11%
71
Outperform
$766.27M0.48%
71
Outperform
$464.52M0.50%
69
Neutral
$238.51M0.35%
62
Neutral
$139.68M0.68%
70
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
33.62
-2.24
-6.25%
BBRE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI U.S. REIT ETF
REZ
iShares Residential and Multisector Real Estate ETF
JPRE
JPMorgan Realty Income ETF
KBWY
Invesco KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ETF
IYRI
NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement